Posts
Kagan non-Recusal May Not Be Important
Justices Alito, Kennedy and Scalia as well as Chief Justice John Roberts verbally handed Solicitor General Verrilli his-ass-on-a-silver-platter during today's arguments on owe-bamaKare. Even the ever-socialist Justice Ginsburg got into the act.... on the respondents' (conservative) side of the argument.
Justice Scalia (URL below: pg 3, ln 10) was the first to verbally 'step-up-to-the-plate. Justice Scalia asked the 'General' if the problems he posed, weren't addressed directly by the federal government.
Justice Kennedy (pg 3, ln 25) asked if commerce can be created in order to regulate it.
Justice Scalia ( pg 5, ln 9) asked about 'self purchasing.' He then commented that the failure to purchase a product in a particular market would subject one to regulation.
Chief Justice Roberts (pg 5, ln 25) compared owe-bamaKare with emergency services, i.e., police, fire, ambulance, road-side service, et al. The 'consumer' never knows when he will require emergency services or health care, or if he ever will, thus a market already exists. Chief Justice Roberts also suggested that the government might mandate cell phone ownership, to facilitate calls to 9-1-1.
Justice Alito (pg 7, ln 12) brought up the possible necessity for burial insurance which completely baffled 'General' Verrilli. Judging by the text, 'General' Verrilli stumbled over his tongue for several minutes during his exchange with the justice.
Justice Alito (pg 9, ln 23) may have discovered as the true intent of owe-bamaKare, I quote the justice:
"....isn't it the case that what this mandate is really doing is not requiring the people who are subject to it to pay for the servies they are going to consume? It is requiring them to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."
Justice Ginsburg (pg 10, ln 20) got into the act with this quote:
"If you're going to have insurance, this is how insurance works."
The testimony before the Court continued for a total of 109 pages; over 2 hours, 2 minutes. I thought it might be dry and legalistic, but actually enjoyed reading the transcript of Day #1. The give-and-take between the justices and 'General' Verrilli looked--to me--to be very embarrassing for the 'General.' Later today I intend to read the respondents' arguments.
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/03/27/obamacare-at-the-supreme-court-day-two-rapid-reactions/
http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=11-398-Tuesday
http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/11-398-Tuesday.pdf
Showing posts with label Kagan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kagan. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
This'n'That; March Twenty-Seventh #1; A 4-4 Tie!
Kagan NOT Eligible To Hear ANY obamaKare!
The United States' Solicitor General is the individual appointed to represent the federal government before the United States Supreme Court. The Solicitor General is responsible for determing the legal position the federal government will take in actions before said Supreme Court.
As the "Clown Prince" nominated (and Senate confirmed) Solicitor General, Ms Kagan has never--prior to her term as Solicitor General--tried a case before ANY court, at ANY level, ANYwhere!! As the owe-bamacRATic Solicitor General, Ms Kagan was instrumental in the formulation of the defense to any EXPECTED cases involving owe-bamaKare. As such, Ms Kagan is barred from hearing testimony--and participating in the decision--concerning the upcoming/ongoing owebamaKare litigation before the current Supreme Court.
The website "TulaneLink" has a study of the 'recusal statutes,'
United States Code, Title 28, Section 455: "Disqualification of Justice, Judge or Magistrate." The point at which said code applies to Ms Kagan:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/26/nobody_doubts_how_the_liberal_members_of_the_supreme_court_will_rule
http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/recusal_99a.htm
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/03/26/4367477/kagan-defies-judicial-ethics-and.html
The United States' Solicitor General is the individual appointed to represent the federal government before the United States Supreme Court. The Solicitor General is responsible for determing the legal position the federal government will take in actions before said Supreme Court.
As the "Clown Prince" nominated (and Senate confirmed) Solicitor General, Ms Kagan has never--prior to her term as Solicitor General--tried a case before ANY court, at ANY level, ANYwhere!! As the owe-bamacRATic Solicitor General, Ms Kagan was instrumental in the formulation of the defense to any EXPECTED cases involving owe-bamaKare. As such, Ms Kagan is barred from hearing testimony--and participating in the decision--concerning the upcoming/ongoing owebamaKare litigation before the current Supreme Court.
The website "TulaneLink" has a study of the 'recusal statutes,'
United States Code, Title 28, Section 455: "Disqualification of Justice, Judge or Magistrate." The point at which said code applies to Ms Kagan:
USC28-455(b)(3): "Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, advisor or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy"Under any interpretation of the aforementioned, Justice Kagan should recuse herself from any involvement--to any degree--in the owe-bamaKare case before the Supreme Court. If no recusal is forthcoming, her more-than-ample ass should be tossed off the bench!!Til Nex'Time....http://www.exposeobama.com/2012/03/26/elena-kagan-breaks-federal-law-by-hearing-obamacare-case-republicans-silent/
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/03/26/nobody_doubts_how_the_liberal_members_of_the_supreme_court_will_rule
http://www.tulanelink.com/tulanelink/recusal_99a.htm
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/03/26/4367477/kagan-defies-judicial-ethics-and.html
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
This'n'That; February Seventh #1; A Waste of Oxygen!!
Supreme Court Justices NOT Gods!!
As Ruth "Buzzy"--er, Bader--Ginsburg has just proven during a visit to Egypt, the United States Supreme Court is NOT made up of 'gods' nor are they infallible!! (Well, she DOES look like Ruth Buzzi!!) Mrs Ginsburg travelled to Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt in January to meet with that country's judges, law professsors, legal experts and invited guests to discuss the United States Constitution and the American legal system in general. During her Egyptian visit, Mrs Ginsburg demonstrated distain for the very document she has sworn to uphold, to support and defend.
Justice Ginsburg made the following statements:
*[The Justice advised her audience:] "....to achieve the goals of this revolution and to continue to strive to create a government of the people, by the people and for the people."
*"....the spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and then in the constitution ....should safeguard basic fundamental human rights, like our First Amendment, the right to speak freely, and to publish freely, without the government as a censor."
Then Mrs Ginsburg took a 'left turn:'
*"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012."
Instead, she pointed toward those countries whose people look to government--as opposed to the Almighty--as the creator of their rights.
*"I might look to the constitution of South Africa. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done."
Mrs Ginsburg then referenced that bastion of freedom and liberty, Canada which enacted their Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982:
*"Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world."
South Africa once was a proud and self-sufficient nation-now, not so much.
South Africa has been on the edge of anarchy for the past two decades.
South Africa has seen over 1,000,000 citizens flee the country since the implementation of 'democracy.'
Canada has been slipping further into socio-fascist 'democracy' for several decades.
Canada's 'democracy' includes 'hate speech' laws which quash or penalize opinions not approved by the ruling authority.
Conservative columnist John Hayward, writing in Human Events, takes us on a 'right turn:'
*"The last thing an Egyptian populace struggling for freedom from the Islamic Muslim Brotherhood needs to hear a paean from a fashinable liberal about ultramodern state charters that enshrine the use of compulsive force in the service of leftist 'positive rights,' such as the right not to be offended."
*"The more fervent muslims trying to turn Egypt into a theocracy are very good at being offended and they love the use of compulsive force to remove the objects of their ire."
*"The Egyptians could use exactly the kind of timeless and powerful ideals laid out by the brilliant framers of the United States Constitution,a document written precisely to thwart the amibitions of 'reformers' who think utopia is just a few trampled individual rights away."
Another turn, even further to the 'right,' is from Mathew Staver, founder and chairman of the Liberty Council as well as Dean, Liberty University School of Law:
*"[Justice] Ginsburg's comments were nothing less than an insult to the venerable document she is commissioned to protect."
*"When given the opportunity to promote American liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda."
*"For a sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to uphold is distressing, to say the least."
*"Justice Ginsburg's comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document."
It's my guess--if we had conservative federal legislators with balls--that Mrs Ginsburg has opened herself up to impeachment! Yes, Supreme Court Justices are subject to removal from the bench by impeachment, as demonstrated by the impeachment of Justice Samuel Chase in 1804. Justice Chase was acquitted by the Senate and subsequently returned to the bench.
All this 'talk' about the Supreme Court and it's justices brings a FAR MORE IMPORTANT point to the fore: With four justices being of advanced age, Ginsburg-78; Scalia-75; Kennedy-75; Breyer-73, the successful Soros purchase of a "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" second term of rule could potentially put 'The American Dream' in a hole it may NEVER get out of!! A second term would allow George Soros' choice of nominees to mirror the socio-fascist views of both 'owe-bama' appointees, Justices Sotomayor and Kagan.
Those of conservative mind and thought as well as those quasi-conservative GOP candidates have a lot on their plates going into the nomination process as well as into the general election. Everyone must pull out all the stops in promoting and advancing the conservative mindset as it relates to the Supreme Court in addition to the upcoming election!!
'Splain to me again why YOU elected this Arschloch?!?
Til Nex'Time....
As Ruth "Buzzy"--er, Bader--Ginsburg has just proven during a visit to Egypt, the United States Supreme Court is NOT made up of 'gods' nor are they infallible!! (Well, she DOES look like Ruth Buzzi!!) Mrs Ginsburg travelled to Cairo and Alexandria, Egypt in January to meet with that country's judges, law professsors, legal experts and invited guests to discuss the United States Constitution and the American legal system in general. During her Egyptian visit, Mrs Ginsburg demonstrated distain for the very document she has sworn to uphold, to support and defend.
 |
| The REAL Ruth Buzzi |
 |
| The Impostor |
Justice Ginsburg made the following statements:
*[The Justice advised her audience:] "....to achieve the goals of this revolution and to continue to strive to create a government of the people, by the people and for the people."
*"....the spirit of liberty has to be in the population, and then in the constitution ....should safeguard basic fundamental human rights, like our First Amendment, the right to speak freely, and to publish freely, without the government as a censor."
Then Mrs Ginsburg took a 'left turn:'
*"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012."
Instead, she pointed toward those countries whose people look to government--as opposed to the Almighty--as the creator of their rights.
*"I might look to the constitution of South Africa. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done."
Mrs Ginsburg then referenced that bastion of freedom and liberty, Canada which enacted their Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982:
*"Yes, why not take advantage of what there is elsewhere in the world."
South Africa once was a proud and self-sufficient nation-now, not so much.
South Africa has been on the edge of anarchy for the past two decades.
South Africa has seen over 1,000,000 citizens flee the country since the implementation of 'democracy.'
Canada has been slipping further into socio-fascist 'democracy' for several decades.
Canada's 'democracy' includes 'hate speech' laws which quash or penalize opinions not approved by the ruling authority.
Conservative columnist John Hayward, writing in Human Events, takes us on a 'right turn:'
*"The last thing an Egyptian populace struggling for freedom from the Islamic Muslim Brotherhood needs to hear a paean from a fashinable liberal about ultramodern state charters that enshrine the use of compulsive force in the service of leftist 'positive rights,' such as the right not to be offended."
*"The more fervent muslims trying to turn Egypt into a theocracy are very good at being offended and they love the use of compulsive force to remove the objects of their ire."
*"The Egyptians could use exactly the kind of timeless and powerful ideals laid out by the brilliant framers of the United States Constitution,a document written precisely to thwart the amibitions of 'reformers' who think utopia is just a few trampled individual rights away."
Another turn, even further to the 'right,' is from Mathew Staver, founder and chairman of the Liberty Council as well as Dean, Liberty University School of Law:
*"[Justice] Ginsburg's comments were nothing less than an insult to the venerable document she is commissioned to protect."
*"When given the opportunity to promote American liberty abroad, Justice Ginsburg did just the opposite and pointed Egypt in the direction of progressivism and the liberal agenda."
*"For a sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice to speak derisively about the Constitution she is sworn to uphold is distressing, to say the least."
*"Justice Ginsburg's comments about our Constitution undermine the Supreme Court as an institution dedicated to the rule of law, as well as our founding document."
It's my guess--if we had conservative federal legislators with balls--that Mrs Ginsburg has opened herself up to impeachment! Yes, Supreme Court Justices are subject to removal from the bench by impeachment, as demonstrated by the impeachment of Justice Samuel Chase in 1804. Justice Chase was acquitted by the Senate and subsequently returned to the bench.
All this 'talk' about the Supreme Court and it's justices brings a FAR MORE IMPORTANT point to the fore: With four justices being of advanced age, Ginsburg-78; Scalia-75; Kennedy-75; Breyer-73, the successful Soros purchase of a "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" second term of rule could potentially put 'The American Dream' in a hole it may NEVER get out of!! A second term would allow George Soros' choice of nominees to mirror the socio-fascist views of both 'owe-bama' appointees, Justices Sotomayor and Kagan.
Those of conservative mind and thought as well as those quasi-conservative GOP candidates have a lot on their plates going into the nomination process as well as into the general election. Everyone must pull out all the stops in promoting and advancing the conservative mindset as it relates to the Supreme Court in addition to the upcoming election!!
'Splain to me again why YOU elected this Arschloch?!?
Til Nex'Time....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
