Posts
If You Ain't....
If ya ain't a republicRAT, a conservative, a constitutionalist, don't bother tuning in! Mark Davis--a WBAP talkshow host--can find SOMETHING in each of the GOP candidates to like. Not to steal a phrase but.... Mr Davis epitomizes "fair and balanced!" Being somewhere-to-the-right of Limbaugh, Beck, et al, I so enjoy listening to Mark!!
Speaking of Limbaugh.... Mr Davis is apart of the "Mark-Trifecta" who sub for Rush when he's out; with Mark Belling and Mark Steyn. Tune in WBAP for the audio 'ride of your life!!'
http://www.wbap.com/article.asp?id=746707 (local-to-Dallas, Texas; 820AM) then click on 'Listen Live'
Til Nex'Time....
Showing posts with label Mark Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mark Davis. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
This'n'That; November Second #1; An Alternative?!?
I May Have Been Wrong!!
Yesterday (November First http://justincase505.blogspot.com/2011/11/thisnthat-november-first-1-more.html), I blogged about "The Soros Plumbers" quite possibly having sabotaged the Herman Cain campaign with "Watergate-esque" activities. I quite possibly may have been wrong (imagine that! Someone admitting a possible error!). I could have been Mr Cain's own party; Mr Cain's opponents for the GOP nomination.
Think about this: Willard "Mitt" Romney--for the most part--has been leading in the polls since forever; this time 'round, the GOP nomination seemed--early on--to be Mr Romney's to lose. Newt Gingrich has been rising in the polls of late. He seems to be considered "a Washington insider," a negative in anybody's book! Texas Governor Rick Perry--after his declaration--shot up meteoritically in the polls, to run a close second to Mr Romney. Mr Rick Santorum seems to have traction on a local basis but not much of a following, nationally. Former Governor John Huntsman--at least to me--seems to be untrustworthy, having been "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" Ambassador to China; potentially a 'stealth' member of the owe-bama inner circle. Mr Ron Paul is largely seen as a bit of a radical, albiet with a potent message and a passionate delivery; probably not electable. Ms Michele Bachmann--after being a top contender--seems to have had 'the bottom fall out of her campaign;' out of her debate credentials.
While I'm accusing no-one, I merely suggest that anyone of these contenders may have been the sabeteur in Mr Cain'ssexual harassment inappropriate actions kerfuffle. Each has good reason to see Mr Cain fail in his quest for the nomination.
The public; the Herman Cain supporters seem not to be buying the assertions that Mr Cain made any inappropriate advances toward co-workers when he ran the National Restaurant Association. On his morning talkshow, Mark Davis (WBAP-820AM; DFW; 8:30-11:00AM, central time; http://www.wbap.com/article.asp?id=746707 ) had several callers and emailers who said they'd already donated from $50 to $150 to the Herman Cain Campaign (as have I!)!! Mark Block--Mr Cain's Chief-of-Staff--reported that in a single, 24-hour period (last Sunday evening to Monday evening), Mr Cain's campaign raised upwards of $400,000; a clear vote-of-confidence!!
Til Nex'Time....
Yesterday (November First http://justincase505.blogspot.com/2011/11/thisnthat-november-first-1-more.html), I blogged about "The Soros Plumbers" quite possibly having sabotaged the Herman Cain campaign with "Watergate-esque" activities. I quite possibly may have been wrong (imagine that! Someone admitting a possible error!). I could have been Mr Cain's own party; Mr Cain's opponents for the GOP nomination.
Think about this: Willard "Mitt" Romney--for the most part--has been leading in the polls since forever; this time 'round, the GOP nomination seemed--early on--to be Mr Romney's to lose. Newt Gingrich has been rising in the polls of late. He seems to be considered "a Washington insider," a negative in anybody's book! Texas Governor Rick Perry--after his declaration--shot up meteoritically in the polls, to run a close second to Mr Romney. Mr Rick Santorum seems to have traction on a local basis but not much of a following, nationally. Former Governor John Huntsman--at least to me--seems to be untrustworthy, having been "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" Ambassador to China; potentially a 'stealth' member of the owe-bama inner circle. Mr Ron Paul is largely seen as a bit of a radical, albiet with a potent message and a passionate delivery; probably not electable. Ms Michele Bachmann--after being a top contender--seems to have had 'the bottom fall out of her campaign;' out of her debate credentials.
While I'm accusing no-one, I merely suggest that anyone of these contenders may have been the sabeteur in Mr Cain's
The public; the Herman Cain supporters seem not to be buying the assertions that Mr Cain made any inappropriate advances toward co-workers when he ran the National Restaurant Association. On his morning talkshow, Mark Davis (WBAP-820AM; DFW; 8:30-11:00AM, central time; http://www.wbap.com/article.asp?id=746707 ) had several callers and emailers who said they'd already donated from $50 to $150 to the Herman Cain Campaign (as have I!)!! Mark Block--Mr Cain's Chief-of-Staff--reported that in a single, 24-hour period (last Sunday evening to Monday evening), Mr Cain's campaign raised upwards of $400,000; a clear vote-of-confidence!!
Til Nex'Time....
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
This'n'That; October Nineteenth #1; GOP Debate
Format Is Same For Vegas Debates
....and that format is:
Pick a liberal pamphleteer as moderator;
Pick a presumptive 'front-runner;'
That 'front-runner' need not be the most popular amongst the public, or leading in the polls; just has to be one of the very few that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" stands 'a ghost of a chance' of beating. (Polls show a "generic [no 'name-brand'] republicRAT" can easily defeat "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist.")
Use the other candidates to aid in vilifying the presumptive 'front-runner;'
Ignore Herman Cain as the statistical 'front-runner' while guiding the other candidates toward Mr Cain's vilification (A 'Cain candidacy' will nullify "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" race-baiting, racial injustice and racial economic injustice planks in his campaign platform).
I 'stayed with' the debate for about 45 minutes. After deciding there would be nothing new; that it's just 'more-of-the-same,' I gave up and watched something else. Any future debates must have a 'format' change! I suggest that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Davis or Mark Steyn moderate any future debates. If the subject of the questioning strays off topic (to vilify another's answer, position) turn off his (or her) microphone with a warning: "Stay on message; stop the personal attacks of fellow candidates." Thus far, the general theme is 'attack' rather than a clear, concise explanation of their positions on the important topics of the day; That Must Change!!
Til Nex'Time....
....and that format is:
Pick a liberal pamphleteer as moderator;
Pick a presumptive 'front-runner;'
That 'front-runner' need not be the most popular amongst the public, or leading in the polls; just has to be one of the very few that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" stands 'a ghost of a chance' of beating. (Polls show a "generic [no 'name-brand'] republicRAT" can easily defeat "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist.")
Use the other candidates to aid in vilifying the presumptive 'front-runner;'
Ignore Herman Cain as the statistical 'front-runner' while guiding the other candidates toward Mr Cain's vilification (A 'Cain candidacy' will nullify "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" race-baiting, racial injustice and racial economic injustice planks in his campaign platform).
I 'stayed with' the debate for about 45 minutes. After deciding there would be nothing new; that it's just 'more-of-the-same,' I gave up and watched something else. Any future debates must have a 'format' change! I suggest that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Davis or Mark Steyn moderate any future debates. If the subject of the questioning strays off topic (to vilify another's answer, position) turn off his (or her) microphone with a warning: "Stay on message; stop the personal attacks of fellow candidates." Thus far, the general theme is 'attack' rather than a clear, concise explanation of their positions on the important topics of the day; That Must Change!!
Til Nex'Time....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
