Posts
A Patriotic Response To The "Clown Prince;" 03/17/2012
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
March 17, 2012
As I’m sure you’ve noticed over the past few weeks, the price at your local pump has been going up and up. And because it’s an election year, so has the temperature of our political rhetoric. What matters most to me right now is the impact that rising prices have on you. When you’ve got to spend more on gas, you’ve got less to spend on everything else. It makes things harder. So I wanted to take a minute this weekend to explain what steps my Administration is taking when it comes to energy – most importantly, producing more of it while using less of it. The truth is: the price of gas depends on a lot of factors that are often beyond our control. Unrest in the Middle East can tighten global oil supply. Growing nations like China or India adding cars to the road increases demand. But one thing we should control is fraud and manipulation that can cause prices to spike even further. For years, traders at financial firms were able to game the energy markets, distort the price of oil, and make big profits for themselves at your expense. And they were able to do all that because of major gaps and loopholes in our regulations. When I took office, we did something about it. The Wall Street reforms I signed into law are helping bring energy markets out of the shadows and under real oversight. They’re strengthening our ability to go after fraud and to prevent traders from manipulating the market. So it’s not just wrong, but dangerous that some in Congress want to roll back those protections and return to the days when companies like Enron could avoid regulation and reap enormous profits, no matter who it hurt. What’s more, at a time when big oil companies are making more money than ever before, we’re still giving them $4 billion of your tax dollars in subsidies every year. Your member of Congress should be fighting for you. Not for big financial firms. Not for big oil companies.
[What I'm not telling you: Good morning, subjects. As you're well aware by now, I'm always ready-and-willing to claim credit whether my decisions are responsible for the actions or not. To that end, I'm claiming credit for the fuel prices' advance, both of late as well as over the l-o-n-g term of my reign. As the blogosphere is rightfully claiming--under my tutelage--the national average gas prices are up nearly 110%--with diesel prices up over 90%--since my immaculation.
The sources required to 'feed' the United States' demand for oil are truly worldwide. I've been on the phone, begging those middle-east oil producers to boost production in an effort to start a downward cycle of U.S. gas and diesel prices. The truth is--and ya better bookmark this, 'truth' is not a prevailing conception for me--Canada is the largest supplier of oil to the United States. After acting against creating 15,000-25,000 short-term jobs; against creating upwards of 200,000 long-term, permanent jobs by refusing to approve the "Keystone XL" Pipeline project, the Canadian government seems to be making good on it's promise. See, I make idle threats almost daily and as such, I don't expect people to take them seriously. I'm finding the 'Canadian mindset' isn't the same, they don't make idle threats!!
The net affect of the loss of the "Keystone XL Pipeline" is Canada has lost the U.S. Gulf Coast as a 'customer' for their oil. At the time the tree-huggers protested the pipeline and I came down on their side, the Canadian government assured us they'd pipe the oil to the Canadian west coast and ship it to China. So, my decision on the pipeline project had a two-fold negative decision: not only did Americans lose this source of good-paying, permanent jobs, the country lost the Albertan oil as a source to feed our ever-growing energy demands.
This brings up the area of 'commodities trading.' To explain the entire system--which I just learned the intricacies of, yesterday--would take several hours and many pages. I'll try to explain what very little I know about this market. A 'commodity' is an item of value which can be traded on markets created for each 'commodity.'
Some of the more actively traded commodities are: gold, silver, diamonds, platinum, crude oil, heating oil, gasoline, coffee, wheat, corn, maize, oats, rice, soybeans, beef, live cattle, pork, eggs, cocoa, butter, orange juice, sugar, aluminum, nickel, copper, lead, ferrous scrap metal, plastic, natural gas and--w-h-e-w!!--bio-fuels, just to name a partial list.
These various 'commodities' are traded on markets such as the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Dubai Mercantile Exchange, the Central Japan Commodity Exchange, the New York Board of Trade, the Kansai Commodities Exchange, the Singapore Commodities Exchange, Euronext (London), the Chicago Board of Trade, the Risk Management Exchange, the Minneapolis Grain Exchange, the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, the Tokyo Grain Exchange, the London Metal Exchange, the Shanghai Futures Exchange, the Hedgestreet Exchange (California), the Brazilian Mercantile and Futures Exchange, the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange, the National Commodities Exchange Limited (Pakistan), the Dalian Community Exchange (China) and--again, w-h-e-w!!--the Bursa Malaysia.
Some of these many traders actually create markets for various commodities, where none previously existed--a truly valuable service. Although I'm currently trying to vilify the various petroleum traders who--I say--drive up prices, actually may reduce prices, given the demand or lack thereof. With the expulsion of the "Keystone XL Pipeline"--and by extension, Canada--I have--consciously or unconsciously--driven up the gas prices for my subjects.
[WHEW!! I went way off-teleprompter, there!!!]
OK boys and girls, back to the original topic as programmed into the teleprompter: We have to continue to vilify that evil 'Big Oil!" I contend that this $4 Billion in subsidies is a huge amount for the American taxpayer to shoulder. Bull-SHIT!! To gain the proper perspective, compare said subsidy to the national debt of say....15.5 TRILLION dollars. The 4 BILLION dollar subsidy is but .000258% (commonly spoken, it's: two-hundred, fifty-eight... hundred-thousandths of a single percentage-point!!! ....4 billion divided by 15,500 billion) I suppose one can say that the national debt--and related borrowing; and related SPENDING--has a 25,800,000 times greater NEGATIVE affect on fuel prices than does the miniscule subsidy to that evil 'Big Oil!!']
In the next few weeks, I expect Congress to vote on ending these subsidies. And when they do, we’re going to put every single Member of Congress on record: They can either stand up for oil companies, or they can stand up for the American people. They can either place their bets on a fossil fuel from the last century, or they can place their bets on America’s future. So make your voice heard. Send your representative an email. Give them a call. Tell them to stand with you. And tell them to be honest with you. It’s easy to promise a quick fix when it comes to gas prices. There just isn’t one. Anyone who tells you otherwise – any career politician who promises some three-point plan for two-dollar gas – they’re not looking for a solution. They’re just looking for your vote. If we’re truly going to make sure we’re not at the mercy of spikes in gas prices every year, the answer isn’t just to drill more – because we’re already drilling more. Under my Administration, we’re producing more oil here at home than at any time in the last eight years, that’s a fact. We’ve quadrupled the number of operating oil rigs to a record high, that’s a fact. And we’ve opened millions of acres on land and offshore to develop more of our domestic resources. Those are the facts. But we can’t just rely on drilling. Not when we use more than 20 percent of the world’s oil, but still only have 2 percent of the world’s known oil reserves. If we don’t develop other sources of energy, and the technology to use less energy, we’ll continue to be dependent on foreign countries for our energy needs. That’s why we’re pursuing an all-of-the-above strategy. As we develop more oil and gas, we’re also developing wind and solar power; biofuels, and next-generation vehicles – and thousands of Americans have jobs right now because of it. We need to keep making those investments – because I don’t want to see those jobs go to other countries. I want to create even more of them right here in America. And after three decades of inaction, we raised fuel economy standards so that by the middle of the next decade, our cars will average nearly 55 miles per gallon. That’s nearly double what they get today. That means you’ll only have to fill up every two weeks instead of every week. And that will save the typical family more than $8,000 over the life of the car – just by using less gas. Combined, these steps have helped put us on a path to greater energy independence. Since I took office, America’s dependence on foreign oil has gone down every single year. In 2010, for the first time in 13 years, less than half the oil we used came from foreign countries. We can do even better. And we will. But what we can’t do is keep being dependent on other countries for our energy needs. In America we control our own destiny. So that’s the choice we face – the past, or the future. And America is what it is today because we have always placed our bets on the future.
[What I'm not telling you: You SHOULD contact your members of Congress!! Were I in your position, I'd demand they keep the subsidies to the evil 'Big Oil' companies in force. To remove said subsidies is tatamount to an added tax on the American driver!! In the whole scheme of things, ending said subsidies and putting that $4 Billion back into the general fund is to give me more money to piss away; more money with which to reward my supporters and donors!!
My support of--nay, DEMAND for--green energy development is ludicruis on it's face!! As they currently stand, each segment of 'green' energy is unsustainable without federal subsidies!! Why are 'green' energy subsidies the way to go, while subsidies to that evil 'Big Oil' is not?!? We have a 250-year supply of fossil fuels at current demand levels. We have no--proven workable--supply of the various 'green' energy sources!!
As that evil Limbaugh is wont to say--and I paraphrase, I don't OPENLY listen to him--
"When 'green' energy can get an airliner to 30,000 feet, I'm all for it!!
(or something like that)"
Prior to my immaculation--prior to the formation of my regime--there was a long-standing 'nationalism' mindset. This United States is the country that won two world wars; who provided most of the materiel for said wars; completely rebuilt entire countries we had necessarily destroyed to prevent just the socio-fascist government that I represent!! In just a few, short, recent years, the country has evolved into an "I, me, my" society with no regard for our neighbors, or any others we interact with in our daily lives!! I feel responsible for that. NO.... I am the reason for that mindset, all a part of my devisive, derisive governance. Divide-and-conquer is the mindset that one country uses as both and offense and a defense against OUTSIDERS! I use it as a successful method in promoting--accomplishing--my 'class' warfare among the 'commoners.' Rather than me continuing to explain an untenible governing position, far more information can be gleaned from reading: http://justincase505.blogspot.com/2012/03/thisnthat-march-sixteenth-1-more.html
This is an explanation of my unremarkable remarks read at the Prince Georges Community College, Largo Maryland. Suffice it to say, that blather was geared to those impressionable young minds not yet converted to socio-fascism.
In conclusion: Beyond pure vilification, there's little sensible reason to continue to attack that evil "Big Oil;" those evil commodities traders!! If it makes sense to 'go after' these two sectors of commerce, the same reasoning would justify a tax on.... investment in gold bullion, for example. NO, you say?!? That resounding statement seems to be coming from my supporters, controllers!!
An aside: Do you know the definition of 'arschloch?!?' It's german for @$$hole!! To those bloggers--you know who you are--I take offense to being assigned that label!! I am NOT German!! I am a muslim Asshole!!!]
Showing posts with label green energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green energy. Show all posts
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Friday, March 16, 2012
This'n'That; March Sixteenth #1; More Unremarkable Remarks
"Clown Prince" Blather Opportunity
Unremarkable Remarks,
Prince George's Community College,
Largo, Maryland
March 15, 2012
Now, I just finished learning about some of the work that you’re doing here at this community college to make sure that homes are using less energy, and helping folks save money on their heating and their air-conditioning bills. And I was very impressed. I’m even more impressed because I know this program is giving a lot of people a chance to make a decent living -- everyone from veterans to folks with disabilities to folks who’ve just been down on their luck but want to work. So I want you to know how proud I am of this program, of this institution, of all of you. The skills that you gain here at this community college will be the surest path to success in this economy. Because if there’s one thing that we’re thinking about a lot these days, is, first of all, how do we make sure that American workers have the skills and education they need to be able to succeed in this competitive global economy? And community colleges all across the country and all across Maryland are doing an outstanding job providing young people that first opportunity after high school but also helping older workers retrain for the jobs of the future because the economy is constantly adapting. So community colleges are big. Community colleges are critical to our long-term success. What’s also critical to our long-term success is the question of energy: How do we use less energy? How do we produce more energy right here in the United States of America?
I have mixed emotions coming here today. On the positive side, I so enjoy coming to community colleges; I don't have to sound very smart to impress the student audience. Another positive is that the student body are usually in their teens and as such, are highly impressionable, they believe all the crap I feed them. On the negative side, this school is in Maryland, just outside the District of Corruption. With the school being that close, I don't have to use Air Force One and that's a dam' shame. The taxpayers fund all my travel--even all those illegal campaign charges I write off to them--but coming here is just a short helicopter ride. Actually it takes three helicopters for all the Secret Service protection and one just hauls all the sound crap and teleprompters. I can't speak without them!!
I have found though, that many students don't belong in a community college. They'd fare far better if they were in a high-quality trade school. The great demand for the future will be in the trades. We have far more lawyers, economists, professional lobbyists and professional, career politicians than we'll ever need in the foreseeable future!!
And I know this is an especially important topic for everybody right now because you guys have to fill up at the gas station. And it’s rough. Gas prices and the world oil markets right now are putting a lot of pressure on families right now. And one of the things that is important to remember is for a lot of folks, just doing what you have to do to get your kids to school, to get to the job, to do grocery shopping -- you don’t have an option. You’ve got to be able to fill up that gas tank. And when prices spike on the world market, it’s like a tax, it’s like somebody is going into your pocket. We passed the payroll tax at the beginning of this year to make sure that everybody had an extra $40 in their paycheck, on average in part because we anticipated that gas prices might be going up like they did last year, given tight world oil supplies. But that doesn’t make it easier for a lot of families out there that are just struggling to get by. This is tough. Now, the question is, how do we meet this challenge? Because right now we’re starting to see a lot of politicians talking a lot but not doing much. And we’ve seen this movie before. Gas prices went up around this time last year. Gas prices shot up in the spring and summer of 2008 -- I remember, I was running for President at the time. This has been going on for years now. And every time prices start to go up -- especially in an election year -- politicians dust off their 3-point plans for $2.00 gas. I guess this year they decided, we're going to make it $2.50. I don't know where -- why not $2.40? Why not $2.10? But they tell the same story. They head down to the gas station; they make sure a few cameras are following them and then they start acting like we've got a magic wand and we will give you cheap gas forever if you just elect us. Every time. Been the same script for 30 years. It's like a bad rerun.
Now, here’s the thing -- because we've seen it all before, we know better. You know better. There is no such thing as a quick fix when it comes to high gas prices. There’s no silver bullet. Anybody who tells you otherwise isn’t really looking for a solution -- they’re trying to ride the political wave of the moment. Usually, the most common thing, when you actually ask them -- all right, how is it that you're going to get back to $2.00 a gallon gas, how are you going to do it, specifically, what is your plan -- then typically what you'll hear from them is, well, if we just drilled more for oil then gas prices would immediately come down and all our problems would go away. That's usually the response. Now, Maryland, there are two problems with that answer. First of all, we are drilling. Under my administration, America is producing more oil today than at any time in the last eight years. (Applause.) Any time. That's a fact. That's a fact. We’ve quadrupled the number of operating oil rigs to a record high. I want everybody to listen to that -- we have more oil rigs operating now than ever. That's a fact. We’ve approved dozens of new pipelines to move oil across the country. We announced our support for a new one in Oklahoma that will help get more oil down to refineries on the Gulf Coast. Over the last three years, my administration has opened millions of acres of land in 23 different states for oil and gas exploration. Offshore, I’ve directed my administration to open up more than 75 percent of our potential oil resources. That includes an area in the Gulf of Mexico we opened up a few months ago that could produce more than 400 million barrels of oil. So do not tell me that we’re not drilling. We’re drilling all over this country. I guess there are a few spots where we’re not drilling. We’re not drilling in the National Mall. We’re not drilling at your house. I guess we could try to have, like, 200 oil rigs in the middle of the Chesapeake Bay. Well, that’s the question. We are drilling at a record pace but we’re doing so in a way that protects the health and safety and the natural resources of the American people. So that’s point number one. If you start hearing this “drill, baby, drill; drill, drill, drill” -- if you start hearing that again, just remember you’ve got the facts -- we’re doing that. Tell me something new. That’s problem number one.
I'm really in an indefensible position, here. You've heard all those lies I've been peddling since fuel prices became the topic du' jour. There's alot more facts that I could spell out, but they're directly opposite of my public position. See, the first and foremost fact is the national average gas price is up over 105% since my immaculation, three LONG years ago. Additional national average diesel price is up 80++% since my immaculation.
I blather almost constantly about that 2% versus 20% lie. The actual phrase that was stolen from is:
"America has 5% of the population but use 24% of the world's energy." Of course, we had to tweak the numbers to make the consumption seem far worse than the rest of the planet. One point that's never mentioned: with the exception of my incredible borrowing and spending, all the energy consumed by the citizens of the United States is bought and paid for; nothing was stolen from the world's third-world ratholes as we socio-fascists would have you believe.
Those 'drilling' numbers I cite?!? Some guy in some broom-closet in MY barackingham Palace pulls them out of his ass!! The actual truth is the vast majority of working drilling sites were approved and permitted in the past 25 years or so, by Presidents Bush-41, "Slick-Willie" Clinton or President Bush-43. True, I opened up lots of federal lands to oil drilling.... but I forgot to mention that I very rarely approve a permit to actually start the drills turning!! Most of the drilling I refer to--that drilling I lead you to believe is taking place on federal lands--is taking place on private lands, sometimes in someone's front-yard!! Given the current--and ongoing--owe-bama Depression, most folks would relish having an oil rig in their yards.... just imagine the royalties they'd be receiving for every barrel pumped out of the ground.
Here’s the second problem with what some of these politicians are talking about. There’s a problem with a strategy that only relies on drilling and that is, America uses more than 20 percent of the world’s oil. If we drilled every square inch of this country -- so we went to your house and we went to the National Mall and we put up those rigs everywhere -- we’d still have only 2 percent of the world’s known oil reserves. Let’s say we miss something -- maybe it’s 3 percent instead of 2. We’re using 20; we have 2. Now, you don’t need to be getting an excellent education at Prince George’s Community College to know that we’ve got a math problem here. I help out Sasha occasionally with her math homework and I know that if you’ve got 2 and you’ve got 20, there’s a gap.
Do we have anybody who’s good at math here? Am I right? Okay.
So if we don’t develop other sources of energy, if we don’t develop the technology to use less energy to make our economy more energy-efficient, then we will always be dependent on foreign countries for our energy needs. And that means every time there’s instability in the Middle East, which is the main thing that’s driving oil prices up right now -- it’s the same thing that was driving oil prices up last year -- every time that happens, every time that there’s unrest, any time that there’s concern about a conflict, suddenly, oil futures shoot up, you’re going to feel it at the pump. It will happen every single time. We will not fully be in control of our energy future if our strategy is only to drill for the 2 percent but we still have to buy the 20 percent. And there’s another wrinkle to this -- other countries use oil, too. We’re not the only ones. So you’ve got rapidly-growing nations like China and India, and they’re all starting to buy cars. They’re getting wealthier. They want cars, too. And that means the price of gas will rise. Just to give you an example -- in 2010, China alone added 10 million new cars. That’s just in one year. And there are about a billion Chinese. So they’ve got a lot more people who are going to want cars in the future, which means they are going to want to get some of that oil and that will drive prices up. So we can’t just drill our way out of the problem. We are drilling, but it’s not going to solve our problem. That’s not the future I want for the United States of America. We can’t allow ourselves to be held hostage to events on the other side of the globe. That’s not who we are. America controls its own destiny. We’re not dependent on somebody else. So we can’t have an energy strategy for the last century that traps us in the past. We need an energy strategy for the future -- an all-of-the-above strategy for the 21st century that develops every source of American-made energy. Yes, develop as much oil and gas as we can, but also develop wind power and solar power and biofuels. Make our buildings more fuel-efficient. Make our homes more fuel-efficient. Make our cars and trucks more fuel-efficient so they get more miles for the gallon. That’s where I want to take this country. And here's -- the best part of it is thousands of Americans have jobs right now because we’ve doubled the use of clean energy in this country since I came into office. And I want to keep on making those investments. (Applause.) I don’t want to see wind turbines and solar panels and high-tech batteries made in other countries by other workers. I want to make them here. I want to make them here in Maryland. I want to make them here in the United States of America, with American workers. That's what I want. So when I came into office, we said, all right, how are we going to start moving America in that direction? It's not a thing you get done in one year, but how do we start moving in that direction? So after 30 years of not doing anything, we raised fuel economy standards on cars and trucks so that by the middle of the next decade, our cars will average nearly 55 miles per gallon -- that's double what we get today -- 55 miles per gallon. Fifty-five miles a gallon.
I have to apologize for this meaningless, unfactual blather.... it ain't my fault; nothing's ever my fault!! The teleprompter is programmed ahead of each blusterful blather; I just read what appears on the screen. We socio-facists are quick with 'the word,' but short with 'the facts!'
The "2%" I'm constantly referring to as if it were a 'cuss-word,' is a far cry from the truth. That "2%" is 22.3 billion barrels of proved oil reserves. "Proved oil reserves" as explained by my own Energy Information Administration (EIA), is a small subset of recoverable resources!! Ok--and George Soros is gonna get really pissed at me for this--let's look at all the oil reserves:
**22.3 bln barrels: those "2%" I blather about, HOURLY, per my own the EIA, and
**86 bln barrels in the Outer Continental Shelf, per my own Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and
**24 bln barrels (shale deposits) in the 'lower-48,' per my own EIA, and
**2 bln barrels (shale deposits) in Alaska's 'North Slope,' per my own U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and
**12 bln barrels in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), per my own USGS, and
**19 bln barrels in the Utah Tar Sands, per my own Bureau of Land Management, and
**1.4 TRILLION barrels in Wyoming's Green River Formation, per my own USGS.
Oh, but these are only estimates, you say!! How true, I say!!
Historically, federal agencies' estimates on anything are generally on the low side. As but one example, I cite North Dakota's Bakken Formation:
In 1995, the USGS estimated the total recoverable oil volume to be 151 million barrels.
In 2008, the USGS increased it's estimate to 3 billion to 4.3 billion barrels.
In 2011, oil analysists increased the estimate to 20 billion barrels.
The United States--by these totals--truely is awash in crude oil!!
So the young people here who were driving those beaters that getting 5 miles per gallon we're going to get you to 55. And that will save the average family more than $8,000 over the life of a car -- $8,000. That will help pay some bills. That means you’ll be able to fill up every two weeks instead of every week. And those are the cars we need to keep building here in the United States.
All right, so now, to fuel these cars and trucks, obviously if they're using less gas, that's great. That saves us; we're using less oil. But we also want to invest in clean advanced biofuels that can replace some of the oil that we're currently using. That's important. Already, we’re using these biofuels to power everything from city buses to UPS trucks to Navy ships. I want to see more of these fuels in American cars -- homegrown fuels -- because that means we're buying less oil from foreign countries and we're creating jobs here in the United States including big parts of rural America, big parts of rural Maryland, where the economy oftentimes is struggling and you have a real opportunity to create entire new industries and put people to work. And it's happening all across the country. So all of these steps have put us on a path of greater energy independence. Here's a statistic I want everybody to remember next time you're talking to somebody who doesn’t know what they're talking about. Since I took office, America’s dependence on foreign oil has gone down every single year. In 2010, our oil dependence, the amount that we're bringing in, the percentage we're bringing in, was under 50 percent for the first time in 13 years. We've got to do better than that, and we can do better than that.
But in order to do better than that, we've got to tell the folks who are stuck in the past that our future depends on this all-of-the-above energy strategy. That’s our job. That it can't just be -- it can't just be drilling for more oil. We're drilling for more oil, but that can't be all the solution; that's just part of the solution. Now, here's the sad thing. Lately, we’ve heard a lot of professional politicians, a lot of the folks who are running for a certain office who shall go unnamed they've been talking down new sources of energy. They dismiss wind power. They dismiss solar power. They make jokes about biofuels. They were against raising fuel standards. I guess they like gas-guzzlers. They think that's good for our future. We’re trying to move towards the future; they want to be stuck in the past. We’ve heard this kind of thinking before. Let me tell you something. If some of these folks were around when Columbus set sail they must have been founding members of the Flat Earth Society. They would not have believed that the world was round. We've heard these folks in the past. They probably would have agreed with one of the pioneers of the radio who said, "Television won’t last. It’s a flash in the pan." One of Henry Ford’s advisors was quoted as saying, "The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a fad." There have always been folks like that. There always have been folks who are the naysayers and don't believe in the future, and don't believe in trying to do things differently. One of my predecessors, Rutherford B. Hayes, reportedly said about the telephone, "It’s a great invention, but who would ever want to use one?" That's why he's not on Mt. Rushmore because he’s looking backwards. He’s not looking forwards. He’s explaining why we can't do something, instead of why we can do something.
The point is, there will always be cynics and naysayers who just want to keep on doing things the same way that we’ve always done them. They want to double down on the same ideas that got us into some of the mess that we’ve been in. But that's not who we are as Americans. See, America has always succeeded because we refuse to stand still. We put faith in the future. We are inventors. We are builders. We are makers of things. We are Thomas Edison. We are the Wright Brothers. We are Bill Gates. We are Steve Jobs. That’s who we are. That’s who we need to be right now. That's who we need to be right now. I don't understand when I hear folks who are in elected office, or aspiring to elected office, who ignore the facts and seem to just want to get a cute bumper sticker line, instead of actually trying to solve our problems. What I just said about energy, by the way, is not disputed by any energy expert. Everybody agrees with this. So why is it that somebody who wants to help lead the country would be ignoring the facts?
If you want an example of what I’m talking about, consider an important issue that's before Congress right now. The question -- there’s a question before Congress I want everybody to know about. The question is whether or not we should keep giving $4 billion in taxpayer subsidies to the oil industry.
The oil industry has been subsidized by you, the taxpayer, for about a hundred years -- 100 years. One hundred years, a century. So some of the same folks who are complaining about biofuels getting subsidies, or wind or solar energy getting subsidies, or electric cars and advanced batteries getting subsidies to help get them off the ground, these same folks -- when you say, why are we still giving subsidies to the oil industry –- “well, no, we need those.” Oil companies are making more money right now than they’ve ever made. On top of the money they’re getting from you at the gas station every time you fill up, they want some of your tax dollars as well.
That doesn't make any sense. Does it make sense?
It’s inexcusable. It is time for this oil industry giveaway to end. So in the next few weeks, I expect Congress to vote on ending these subsidies. And when they do, they’ll put every single member of Congress on record. I guess you can stand up for the oil companies who really don't need much help, or they can stand up for the American people, because we can take that $4 billion -- we could be investing it in clean energy in a good energy future, in fuel efficiency. We could actually be trying to solve a vital problem. They can bet -- they can place their bets on the energy of the past, or they can place their bets on America’s future -- on American workers, American ingenuity, American technology, American science, American-made energy, American efficiency, American productivity. We can bet on America and our own capacity to solve this problem. That’s the choice we face. That’s what’s at stake right now.
Maryland, we know what direction we have to go in.
And every American out there, as frustrated as they are about gas prices right now, when you actually ask people, they’ll tell you, yes, we’ve got to find new sources of energy. We got to find new ways of doing things. People understand that. We just got to get Washington to understand it. We got to get politicians to understand it. We’ve got to invest in a serious, sustained, all-of-the-above energy strategy that develops every resource available for the 21st century. We’ve got to choose between the past and the future. And that's a choice we shouldn’t be afraid to make because we’ve always bet on the future, and we’re good at it. America is good at the future. We are good at being ahead of the curve. We’re good at being on the cutting edge. Ending these subsidies won’t bring down gas prices tomorrow. Even if we drilled every inch of America, that won’t bring gas prices down tomorrow. But if we’re tired of watching gas prices spike every single year, and being caught in this position, where what happens in the Middle East ends up taking money out of your pocket, if we want to stabilize energy prices for the long term and the medium term, if we want America to grow, we’re going to have look past what we’ve been doing and put ourselves on the path to a real, sustainable energy future. That’s the future you deserve. So I need all of you to make your voices heard. Get on the phone, write an email, send a letter, let your member of Congress know where you stand. Tell them to do the right thing. Tell them we can win this fight. Tell them we’re going to combine our creativity and our optimism, our brainpower, our manpower, our womanpower. Tell them: Yes, we can. Tell them we are going to build an economy that lasts. Tell them we’re going to make this the American century just like the last century.
$8,000!! Wow!! $8,000, really?!? That's a huge number, right?!? OK, now take blusterful bullshit out of the equation. The average age of a car in the United States has increased since I instututed the owe-bama Depression with my wild borrowing from the Chinese and my reckless spending to reward the various unions, my donors, my supporters as well as my campaign workers. That vehicle average is now about 12 years!! Wow!! That's a pretty old car for anyone to be driving. Now--all bullshit aside--when you do the math--here we go again with the math--that $8,000 "over the life of the car" now looks like less than $700 a year; $58 a month; less than $3 a work-day!! The number suddenly isn't so big any more, is it?!?
"....invest in clean advanced biofuels...." On it's face, that's a ludicrius statement!! As much as the socio-fascists--the liberals; the progressives; the owe-bamacRATics--want the public to see them as the nation's "do-gooders," I'm completely dumbfounded that they go along with this biofuels bullshit!! Biofuels are manufactured--actually, distilled--from food grains and grasses. To put the grains to this use is the greatest mis-use that could be undertaken. OK, the aforementioned socialist groups "don't-give-two-hoots-in-hell" for those in the United States that may be food-deprived, if not starving; the grains could be used to feed millions of souls in world's various third-world ratholes!!
Until the various unsustainable 'green' energy sources I support and promote, are stand-alone industries in the energy sector, all 'R and D' should be left to the private sector without federal interference; without federal monies. As it stands now, so long as the interference and monies are as pervasive as they are; no 'green' energy source will ever be able to stand alone. Can anybody spell "Chevy-Volt?!?" We bribe each buyer with $7,500. If the Volt's sales remain as dismal as they've been of late, I'm contemplating raising the bribe to $10,000!! If the Volt were forced to 'stand alone,' it would be a $41,000 vehicle! What idiot would buy one when--with the addition of less than $8,000--they could drive away in a Corvette!!!
The jet engine in it's various sizes, is the most prolific energy source in aviation. Thousands are used in both civilian and military aircraft, worldwide. No 'green' energy source can compete with the jet engine! Until they can--which is probably NEVER--no 'green' energy source will completely replace fossil fuels. Until there is a wind-powered; a water-powered; a solar-powered aircraft, fossil fuels will be the ONLY WORKABLE ENERGY SOURCE for high speed travel; high speed military aircraft!!
America DOES NOT have to choose between the past and the future. This is nothing more than a source for further socio-fascist 'warfare,' much like class warfare; much like economic warfare; much like racial warfare!! I employ an "all-the-above" approach when it comes to using 'warfare' to advance my dismal chances for re-immaculation!!
As I quietly acknowledge, those "$4 billion in oil company subsidies" are a necessity. Sure, it may appear that we're subsidizing said companies' huge--albeit evil--profits at the expense of the working man and woman; at the expense of working families;.... ah..... what-ta-hell.... at the expense of the children!! Everybody uses 'children' when they want to make a point by tugging at the public heartstrings!! What do you suppose would be the net affect of ending said subsidies?!? Let me tell'ya.... The evil oil companies ain't gonna 'eat' the added expense!! They'll pass it on, ultimately to the end user..... YOU, the consumer!! How--when coupled with MY doubling of gas prices in three years--do you think that will affect my dwindling chances at re-immaculation?!? Not Well!!
Ta'hell with George Soros!! Yes, contact your senators and congressmen and women!! But.... tell them to approve more drilling permits; tell them to approve more oil refineries; tell them to approve new--as well as replacement--nuclear reactors!! If we truly want an "all-the-above" approach to a national energy policy, these will put the 'non-greens' on equal footing with the 'greens,' thus truly "all-the-above!!"
Unremarkable Remarks,
Prince George's Community College,
Largo, Maryland
March 15, 2012
Now, I just finished learning about some of the work that you’re doing here at this community college to make sure that homes are using less energy, and helping folks save money on their heating and their air-conditioning bills. And I was very impressed. I’m even more impressed because I know this program is giving a lot of people a chance to make a decent living -- everyone from veterans to folks with disabilities to folks who’ve just been down on their luck but want to work. So I want you to know how proud I am of this program, of this institution, of all of you. The skills that you gain here at this community college will be the surest path to success in this economy. Because if there’s one thing that we’re thinking about a lot these days, is, first of all, how do we make sure that American workers have the skills and education they need to be able to succeed in this competitive global economy? And community colleges all across the country and all across Maryland are doing an outstanding job providing young people that first opportunity after high school but also helping older workers retrain for the jobs of the future because the economy is constantly adapting. So community colleges are big. Community colleges are critical to our long-term success. What’s also critical to our long-term success is the question of energy: How do we use less energy? How do we produce more energy right here in the United States of America?
I have mixed emotions coming here today. On the positive side, I so enjoy coming to community colleges; I don't have to sound very smart to impress the student audience. Another positive is that the student body are usually in their teens and as such, are highly impressionable, they believe all the crap I feed them. On the negative side, this school is in Maryland, just outside the District of Corruption. With the school being that close, I don't have to use Air Force One and that's a dam' shame. The taxpayers fund all my travel--even all those illegal campaign charges I write off to them--but coming here is just a short helicopter ride. Actually it takes three helicopters for all the Secret Service protection and one just hauls all the sound crap and teleprompters. I can't speak without them!!
I have found though, that many students don't belong in a community college. They'd fare far better if they were in a high-quality trade school. The great demand for the future will be in the trades. We have far more lawyers, economists, professional lobbyists and professional, career politicians than we'll ever need in the foreseeable future!!
And I know this is an especially important topic for everybody right now because you guys have to fill up at the gas station. And it’s rough. Gas prices and the world oil markets right now are putting a lot of pressure on families right now. And one of the things that is important to remember is for a lot of folks, just doing what you have to do to get your kids to school, to get to the job, to do grocery shopping -- you don’t have an option. You’ve got to be able to fill up that gas tank. And when prices spike on the world market, it’s like a tax, it’s like somebody is going into your pocket. We passed the payroll tax at the beginning of this year to make sure that everybody had an extra $40 in their paycheck, on average in part because we anticipated that gas prices might be going up like they did last year, given tight world oil supplies. But that doesn’t make it easier for a lot of families out there that are just struggling to get by. This is tough. Now, the question is, how do we meet this challenge? Because right now we’re starting to see a lot of politicians talking a lot but not doing much. And we’ve seen this movie before. Gas prices went up around this time last year. Gas prices shot up in the spring and summer of 2008 -- I remember, I was running for President at the time. This has been going on for years now. And every time prices start to go up -- especially in an election year -- politicians dust off their 3-point plans for $2.00 gas. I guess this year they decided, we're going to make it $2.50. I don't know where -- why not $2.40? Why not $2.10? But they tell the same story. They head down to the gas station; they make sure a few cameras are following them and then they start acting like we've got a magic wand and we will give you cheap gas forever if you just elect us. Every time. Been the same script for 30 years. It's like a bad rerun.
Now, here’s the thing -- because we've seen it all before, we know better. You know better. There is no such thing as a quick fix when it comes to high gas prices. There’s no silver bullet. Anybody who tells you otherwise isn’t really looking for a solution -- they’re trying to ride the political wave of the moment. Usually, the most common thing, when you actually ask them -- all right, how is it that you're going to get back to $2.00 a gallon gas, how are you going to do it, specifically, what is your plan -- then typically what you'll hear from them is, well, if we just drilled more for oil then gas prices would immediately come down and all our problems would go away. That's usually the response. Now, Maryland, there are two problems with that answer. First of all, we are drilling. Under my administration, America is producing more oil today than at any time in the last eight years. (Applause.) Any time. That's a fact. That's a fact. We’ve quadrupled the number of operating oil rigs to a record high. I want everybody to listen to that -- we have more oil rigs operating now than ever. That's a fact. We’ve approved dozens of new pipelines to move oil across the country. We announced our support for a new one in Oklahoma that will help get more oil down to refineries on the Gulf Coast. Over the last three years, my administration has opened millions of acres of land in 23 different states for oil and gas exploration. Offshore, I’ve directed my administration to open up more than 75 percent of our potential oil resources. That includes an area in the Gulf of Mexico we opened up a few months ago that could produce more than 400 million barrels of oil. So do not tell me that we’re not drilling. We’re drilling all over this country. I guess there are a few spots where we’re not drilling. We’re not drilling in the National Mall. We’re not drilling at your house. I guess we could try to have, like, 200 oil rigs in the middle of the Chesapeake Bay. Well, that’s the question. We are drilling at a record pace but we’re doing so in a way that protects the health and safety and the natural resources of the American people. So that’s point number one. If you start hearing this “drill, baby, drill; drill, drill, drill” -- if you start hearing that again, just remember you’ve got the facts -- we’re doing that. Tell me something new. That’s problem number one.
I'm really in an indefensible position, here. You've heard all those lies I've been peddling since fuel prices became the topic du' jour. There's alot more facts that I could spell out, but they're directly opposite of my public position. See, the first and foremost fact is the national average gas price is up over 105% since my immaculation, three LONG years ago. Additional national average diesel price is up 80++% since my immaculation.
I blather almost constantly about that 2% versus 20% lie. The actual phrase that was stolen from is:
"America has 5% of the population but use 24% of the world's energy." Of course, we had to tweak the numbers to make the consumption seem far worse than the rest of the planet. One point that's never mentioned: with the exception of my incredible borrowing and spending, all the energy consumed by the citizens of the United States is bought and paid for; nothing was stolen from the world's third-world ratholes as we socio-fascists would have you believe.
Those 'drilling' numbers I cite?!? Some guy in some broom-closet in MY barackingham Palace pulls them out of his ass!! The actual truth is the vast majority of working drilling sites were approved and permitted in the past 25 years or so, by Presidents Bush-41, "Slick-Willie" Clinton or President Bush-43. True, I opened up lots of federal lands to oil drilling.... but I forgot to mention that I very rarely approve a permit to actually start the drills turning!! Most of the drilling I refer to--that drilling I lead you to believe is taking place on federal lands--is taking place on private lands, sometimes in someone's front-yard!! Given the current--and ongoing--owe-bama Depression, most folks would relish having an oil rig in their yards.... just imagine the royalties they'd be receiving for every barrel pumped out of the ground.
Here’s the second problem with what some of these politicians are talking about. There’s a problem with a strategy that only relies on drilling and that is, America uses more than 20 percent of the world’s oil. If we drilled every square inch of this country -- so we went to your house and we went to the National Mall and we put up those rigs everywhere -- we’d still have only 2 percent of the world’s known oil reserves. Let’s say we miss something -- maybe it’s 3 percent instead of 2. We’re using 20; we have 2. Now, you don’t need to be getting an excellent education at Prince George’s Community College to know that we’ve got a math problem here. I help out Sasha occasionally with her math homework and I know that if you’ve got 2 and you’ve got 20, there’s a gap.
Do we have anybody who’s good at math here? Am I right? Okay.
So if we don’t develop other sources of energy, if we don’t develop the technology to use less energy to make our economy more energy-efficient, then we will always be dependent on foreign countries for our energy needs. And that means every time there’s instability in the Middle East, which is the main thing that’s driving oil prices up right now -- it’s the same thing that was driving oil prices up last year -- every time that happens, every time that there’s unrest, any time that there’s concern about a conflict, suddenly, oil futures shoot up, you’re going to feel it at the pump. It will happen every single time. We will not fully be in control of our energy future if our strategy is only to drill for the 2 percent but we still have to buy the 20 percent. And there’s another wrinkle to this -- other countries use oil, too. We’re not the only ones. So you’ve got rapidly-growing nations like China and India, and they’re all starting to buy cars. They’re getting wealthier. They want cars, too. And that means the price of gas will rise. Just to give you an example -- in 2010, China alone added 10 million new cars. That’s just in one year. And there are about a billion Chinese. So they’ve got a lot more people who are going to want cars in the future, which means they are going to want to get some of that oil and that will drive prices up. So we can’t just drill our way out of the problem. We are drilling, but it’s not going to solve our problem. That’s not the future I want for the United States of America. We can’t allow ourselves to be held hostage to events on the other side of the globe. That’s not who we are. America controls its own destiny. We’re not dependent on somebody else. So we can’t have an energy strategy for the last century that traps us in the past. We need an energy strategy for the future -- an all-of-the-above strategy for the 21st century that develops every source of American-made energy. Yes, develop as much oil and gas as we can, but also develop wind power and solar power and biofuels. Make our buildings more fuel-efficient. Make our homes more fuel-efficient. Make our cars and trucks more fuel-efficient so they get more miles for the gallon. That’s where I want to take this country. And here's -- the best part of it is thousands of Americans have jobs right now because we’ve doubled the use of clean energy in this country since I came into office. And I want to keep on making those investments. (Applause.) I don’t want to see wind turbines and solar panels and high-tech batteries made in other countries by other workers. I want to make them here. I want to make them here in Maryland. I want to make them here in the United States of America, with American workers. That's what I want. So when I came into office, we said, all right, how are we going to start moving America in that direction? It's not a thing you get done in one year, but how do we start moving in that direction? So after 30 years of not doing anything, we raised fuel economy standards on cars and trucks so that by the middle of the next decade, our cars will average nearly 55 miles per gallon -- that's double what we get today -- 55 miles per gallon. Fifty-five miles a gallon.
I have to apologize for this meaningless, unfactual blather.... it ain't my fault; nothing's ever my fault!! The teleprompter is programmed ahead of each blusterful blather; I just read what appears on the screen. We socio-facists are quick with 'the word,' but short with 'the facts!'
The "2%" I'm constantly referring to as if it were a 'cuss-word,' is a far cry from the truth. That "2%" is 22.3 billion barrels of proved oil reserves. "Proved oil reserves" as explained by my own Energy Information Administration (EIA), is a small subset of recoverable resources!! Ok--and George Soros is gonna get really pissed at me for this--let's look at all the oil reserves:
**22.3 bln barrels: those "2%" I blather about, HOURLY, per my own the EIA, and
**86 bln barrels in the Outer Continental Shelf, per my own Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and
**24 bln barrels (shale deposits) in the 'lower-48,' per my own EIA, and
**2 bln barrels (shale deposits) in Alaska's 'North Slope,' per my own U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and
**12 bln barrels in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), per my own USGS, and
**19 bln barrels in the Utah Tar Sands, per my own Bureau of Land Management, and
**1.4 TRILLION barrels in Wyoming's Green River Formation, per my own USGS.
Oh, but these are only estimates, you say!! How true, I say!!
Historically, federal agencies' estimates on anything are generally on the low side. As but one example, I cite North Dakota's Bakken Formation:
In 1995, the USGS estimated the total recoverable oil volume to be 151 million barrels.
In 2008, the USGS increased it's estimate to 3 billion to 4.3 billion barrels.
In 2011, oil analysists increased the estimate to 20 billion barrels.
The United States--by these totals--truely is awash in crude oil!!
So the young people here who were driving those beaters that getting 5 miles per gallon we're going to get you to 55. And that will save the average family more than $8,000 over the life of a car -- $8,000. That will help pay some bills. That means you’ll be able to fill up every two weeks instead of every week. And those are the cars we need to keep building here in the United States.
All right, so now, to fuel these cars and trucks, obviously if they're using less gas, that's great. That saves us; we're using less oil. But we also want to invest in clean advanced biofuels that can replace some of the oil that we're currently using. That's important. Already, we’re using these biofuels to power everything from city buses to UPS trucks to Navy ships. I want to see more of these fuels in American cars -- homegrown fuels -- because that means we're buying less oil from foreign countries and we're creating jobs here in the United States including big parts of rural America, big parts of rural Maryland, where the economy oftentimes is struggling and you have a real opportunity to create entire new industries and put people to work. And it's happening all across the country. So all of these steps have put us on a path of greater energy independence. Here's a statistic I want everybody to remember next time you're talking to somebody who doesn’t know what they're talking about. Since I took office, America’s dependence on foreign oil has gone down every single year. In 2010, our oil dependence, the amount that we're bringing in, the percentage we're bringing in, was under 50 percent for the first time in 13 years. We've got to do better than that, and we can do better than that.
But in order to do better than that, we've got to tell the folks who are stuck in the past that our future depends on this all-of-the-above energy strategy. That’s our job. That it can't just be -- it can't just be drilling for more oil. We're drilling for more oil, but that can't be all the solution; that's just part of the solution. Now, here's the sad thing. Lately, we’ve heard a lot of professional politicians, a lot of the folks who are running for a certain office who shall go unnamed they've been talking down new sources of energy. They dismiss wind power. They dismiss solar power. They make jokes about biofuels. They were against raising fuel standards. I guess they like gas-guzzlers. They think that's good for our future. We’re trying to move towards the future; they want to be stuck in the past. We’ve heard this kind of thinking before. Let me tell you something. If some of these folks were around when Columbus set sail they must have been founding members of the Flat Earth Society. They would not have believed that the world was round. We've heard these folks in the past. They probably would have agreed with one of the pioneers of the radio who said, "Television won’t last. It’s a flash in the pan." One of Henry Ford’s advisors was quoted as saying, "The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a fad." There have always been folks like that. There always have been folks who are the naysayers and don't believe in the future, and don't believe in trying to do things differently. One of my predecessors, Rutherford B. Hayes, reportedly said about the telephone, "It’s a great invention, but who would ever want to use one?" That's why he's not on Mt. Rushmore because he’s looking backwards. He’s not looking forwards. He’s explaining why we can't do something, instead of why we can do something.
The point is, there will always be cynics and naysayers who just want to keep on doing things the same way that we’ve always done them. They want to double down on the same ideas that got us into some of the mess that we’ve been in. But that's not who we are as Americans. See, America has always succeeded because we refuse to stand still. We put faith in the future. We are inventors. We are builders. We are makers of things. We are Thomas Edison. We are the Wright Brothers. We are Bill Gates. We are Steve Jobs. That’s who we are. That’s who we need to be right now. That's who we need to be right now. I don't understand when I hear folks who are in elected office, or aspiring to elected office, who ignore the facts and seem to just want to get a cute bumper sticker line, instead of actually trying to solve our problems. What I just said about energy, by the way, is not disputed by any energy expert. Everybody agrees with this. So why is it that somebody who wants to help lead the country would be ignoring the facts?
If you want an example of what I’m talking about, consider an important issue that's before Congress right now. The question -- there’s a question before Congress I want everybody to know about. The question is whether or not we should keep giving $4 billion in taxpayer subsidies to the oil industry.
The oil industry has been subsidized by you, the taxpayer, for about a hundred years -- 100 years. One hundred years, a century. So some of the same folks who are complaining about biofuels getting subsidies, or wind or solar energy getting subsidies, or electric cars and advanced batteries getting subsidies to help get them off the ground, these same folks -- when you say, why are we still giving subsidies to the oil industry –- “well, no, we need those.” Oil companies are making more money right now than they’ve ever made. On top of the money they’re getting from you at the gas station every time you fill up, they want some of your tax dollars as well.
That doesn't make any sense. Does it make sense?
It’s inexcusable. It is time for this oil industry giveaway to end. So in the next few weeks, I expect Congress to vote on ending these subsidies. And when they do, they’ll put every single member of Congress on record. I guess you can stand up for the oil companies who really don't need much help, or they can stand up for the American people, because we can take that $4 billion -- we could be investing it in clean energy in a good energy future, in fuel efficiency. We could actually be trying to solve a vital problem. They can bet -- they can place their bets on the energy of the past, or they can place their bets on America’s future -- on American workers, American ingenuity, American technology, American science, American-made energy, American efficiency, American productivity. We can bet on America and our own capacity to solve this problem. That’s the choice we face. That’s what’s at stake right now.
Maryland, we know what direction we have to go in.
And every American out there, as frustrated as they are about gas prices right now, when you actually ask people, they’ll tell you, yes, we’ve got to find new sources of energy. We got to find new ways of doing things. People understand that. We just got to get Washington to understand it. We got to get politicians to understand it. We’ve got to invest in a serious, sustained, all-of-the-above energy strategy that develops every resource available for the 21st century. We’ve got to choose between the past and the future. And that's a choice we shouldn’t be afraid to make because we’ve always bet on the future, and we’re good at it. America is good at the future. We are good at being ahead of the curve. We’re good at being on the cutting edge. Ending these subsidies won’t bring down gas prices tomorrow. Even if we drilled every inch of America, that won’t bring gas prices down tomorrow. But if we’re tired of watching gas prices spike every single year, and being caught in this position, where what happens in the Middle East ends up taking money out of your pocket, if we want to stabilize energy prices for the long term and the medium term, if we want America to grow, we’re going to have look past what we’ve been doing and put ourselves on the path to a real, sustainable energy future. That’s the future you deserve. So I need all of you to make your voices heard. Get on the phone, write an email, send a letter, let your member of Congress know where you stand. Tell them to do the right thing. Tell them we can win this fight. Tell them we’re going to combine our creativity and our optimism, our brainpower, our manpower, our womanpower. Tell them: Yes, we can. Tell them we are going to build an economy that lasts. Tell them we’re going to make this the American century just like the last century.
$8,000!! Wow!! $8,000, really?!? That's a huge number, right?!? OK, now take blusterful bullshit out of the equation. The average age of a car in the United States has increased since I instututed the owe-bama Depression with my wild borrowing from the Chinese and my reckless spending to reward the various unions, my donors, my supporters as well as my campaign workers. That vehicle average is now about 12 years!! Wow!! That's a pretty old car for anyone to be driving. Now--all bullshit aside--when you do the math--here we go again with the math--that $8,000 "over the life of the car" now looks like less than $700 a year; $58 a month; less than $3 a work-day!! The number suddenly isn't so big any more, is it?!?
"....invest in clean advanced biofuels...." On it's face, that's a ludicrius statement!! As much as the socio-fascists--the liberals; the progressives; the owe-bamacRATics--want the public to see them as the nation's "do-gooders," I'm completely dumbfounded that they go along with this biofuels bullshit!! Biofuels are manufactured--actually, distilled--from food grains and grasses. To put the grains to this use is the greatest mis-use that could be undertaken. OK, the aforementioned socialist groups "don't-give-two-hoots-in-hell" for those in the United States that may be food-deprived, if not starving; the grains could be used to feed millions of souls in world's various third-world ratholes!!
Until the various unsustainable 'green' energy sources I support and promote, are stand-alone industries in the energy sector, all 'R and D' should be left to the private sector without federal interference; without federal monies. As it stands now, so long as the interference and monies are as pervasive as they are; no 'green' energy source will ever be able to stand alone. Can anybody spell "Chevy-Volt?!?" We bribe each buyer with $7,500. If the Volt's sales remain as dismal as they've been of late, I'm contemplating raising the bribe to $10,000!! If the Volt were forced to 'stand alone,' it would be a $41,000 vehicle! What idiot would buy one when--with the addition of less than $8,000--they could drive away in a Corvette!!!
The jet engine in it's various sizes, is the most prolific energy source in aviation. Thousands are used in both civilian and military aircraft, worldwide. No 'green' energy source can compete with the jet engine! Until they can--which is probably NEVER--no 'green' energy source will completely replace fossil fuels. Until there is a wind-powered; a water-powered; a solar-powered aircraft, fossil fuels will be the ONLY WORKABLE ENERGY SOURCE for high speed travel; high speed military aircraft!!
America DOES NOT have to choose between the past and the future. This is nothing more than a source for further socio-fascist 'warfare,' much like class warfare; much like economic warfare; much like racial warfare!! I employ an "all-the-above" approach when it comes to using 'warfare' to advance my dismal chances for re-immaculation!!
As I quietly acknowledge, those "$4 billion in oil company subsidies" are a necessity. Sure, it may appear that we're subsidizing said companies' huge--albeit evil--profits at the expense of the working man and woman; at the expense of working families;.... ah..... what-ta-hell.... at the expense of the children!! Everybody uses 'children' when they want to make a point by tugging at the public heartstrings!! What do you suppose would be the net affect of ending said subsidies?!? Let me tell'ya.... The evil oil companies ain't gonna 'eat' the added expense!! They'll pass it on, ultimately to the end user..... YOU, the consumer!! How--when coupled with MY doubling of gas prices in three years--do you think that will affect my dwindling chances at re-immaculation?!? Not Well!!
Ta'hell with George Soros!! Yes, contact your senators and congressmen and women!! But.... tell them to approve more drilling permits; tell them to approve more oil refineries; tell them to approve new--as well as replacement--nuclear reactors!! If we truly want an "all-the-above" approach to a national energy policy, these will put the 'non-greens' on equal footing with the 'greens,' thus truly "all-the-above!!"
Saturday, March 3, 2012
"Clown Prince" Weekly Blather; March 3rd
A Patriotic Response To The "Clown Prince;" 03/03/2012
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
March 3, 2012
Earlier this week, I spent some time with the hardworking men and women of the American auto industry, who are busy writing a new chapter in America’s story. Just a few years ago, their industry was shedding hundreds of thousands of jobs. Two of the Big Three – GM and Chrysler – were on the brink of failure. If we had let this great American industry collapse – if we had let Detroit go bankrupt – more than one million Americans would have lost their jobs in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. I refused to let that happen. These jobs are worth more than just a paycheck – they’re a source of pride and a ticket to the middle class. These companies are worth more than just the cars they build – they’re a symbol of American innovation and a source of our manufacturing might. So in exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. We got the companies to retool and restructure. Everyone sacrificed. And three years later, the American auto industry is back. Today, GM is the number one automaker in the world. Chrysler is growing faster in America than any other car company. Ford is investing billions in American plants and factories, and plans to bring thousands of jobs back home. All told, the entire industry has added more than 200,000 new jobs over the past two and a half years. And they’re not just building cars again – they’re building better cars. Thanks to new fuel efficiency standards we put in place, they’re building cars that will average nearly 55 miles per gallon by the middle of the next decade. That’s almost double what they get today. That means folks will be able to fill up every two weeks instead of every week, saving the typical family more than $8,000 at the pump over time. That’s a big deal, especially as families are yet again feeling the pinch from rising gas prices. So what’s happening in Detroit will make a difference. But it won’t solve everything. There’s no silver bullet for avoiding spikes in gas prices every year. There’s no shortcut to taking control of our energy future. We have to pursue an all-of-the-above strategy that helps develop every source of American energy. And we have to do it now.
[What I'm not telling you: No one seems to question why I never visit auto manufacturing plants in Tennessee, Kentucky, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana or Texas. I'll tell'ya why: Because I don't own them, they're primarily foreign-badged manufacturers!! If I didn't own General--or 'Government'--Motors and Chrysler, it's doubtful I'd visit Michigan either, with the exception of the on-going union rewards built into the bailout PORKulus bill.
It's very easy to hypothesize about "cudda; wudda; shudda!" We can 'manufacture' various numbers of jobs that would have 'disappeared' had we not bailed out GM and Chrysler. And, what did the American taxpayer, the American investor get for their investment?!? They got the shaft.... that's what they got!! The American investor watched as George Soros and the Regime rewarded the United Auto Workers union with a 37% ownership stake in General Motors while--simultaneously--the federal government underwrote the UAW--underwater--Health and Retirement program. The American investor was rewarded for their confidence in the viability of GM prior to the federal takeover with a reasonable return on investment (ROI). As a result of the federal takeover, those investors--primarily the bond investors--were rewarded with the loss of 96-98 cents on every dollar invested!! The screwing the American taxpayer took on the Chrysler bailout was of collosal proportions! They essentially bailed out a foreign company--Fiat which owns 58% of Chrysler--and negotiated with the UAW to give the remainder to that union's Health Care Trust.
Had the owe-bama Regime let both auto companies proceed into bankruptcy as it should have, it's doubtful that 'a million jobs' would have been lost. While there may have been extensive lay-offs, a vast majority of those would have been recalled to work, post-bankruptcy. The end result of the bankruptcy procedures would have been leaner, meaner far more efficient manufacturing facilities, nationwide! Both companies' product quality would have improved--to compete with the likes of Honda, Toyota, Kia, Land Rover, et al--which would have generated greater sales, worldwide. We can--and will--brag that General Motors--as a conglomerate--is the largest car maker in the world. But how does the top Buick model's sales compare with those of the Honda Accord, for example?!?
As a sidebar, have you seen the affects of Regime--and by 'Regime,' I mean George Soros' orders--support for alternative energy sources?!? Every one I've touched has collapsed "in a pile of rubble," financially!! First, we proped up Solyndra and their 'sister' companies with billions-of-TAXPAYER-dollars, only to have them enter into bankruptcy shortly thereafter. Now we come to the Chevy Volt. The only way Chevy could sell them is to have the federal taxpayer underwrite about 20% of the purchase price, with the $7,500-$10,000 rebate per vehicle!! That wasn't enough to forestall a five-week plant shutdown.
(Note: Add $8,000 to the Volt's retail price of $41,000 and you could drive away in a new '12 CORVETTE!!)
The Volt--with it's on-going battery problems, coupled with it's 25-mile electric range--seems destined to go the way of Solyndra!! Apparently the GM hierarchy feels the same way. They're preparing to manufacture both the Chevy Chevelle and Impala in the Volt's Hamtramck, Mi., plant next year.
Sure fuel price spikes do happen every Spring The 2012 price-spike is very early in the season, exacerbated by the Regime's complete lack of a viable energy policy. Oh, don't get me wrong: We do have an energy policy. Castigate fossil fuels in favor of those currently unsustainable--without government financial intervention--'green' energy sources. Some reliable studies--that Soros and I, even with our investments in Brazilian oil, do not subscribe to--have concluded that fossil fuels are a RENEWABLE RESOURCE!! As is the norm, I continue the bold-faced lie that the United States only has 2% of the earth's energy supplies!! If I were the least-bit concerned with the truth, I'd have to repeat the new slogan: "The United States is the Saudi Arabia of natural gas!!" Seemingly--much to my chagrin--we almost daily discover new and larger gas fields.... all over the country, from the oil fields of the Dakotas to the Marcellus Shale gas fields of the Northeast!! If George Soros, the Regime and me, personally, are not successful--soon--in vilifying fossil fuels in favor of those unsustainable 'green' sources, I fear we will have lost our chance! Said vilification is essential in 'the spread of socialism of America!!']
The good news is, we’ve been making progress. Take a look at this chart. Six years ago, 60% of the oil we used was imported. Since I took office, America’s dependence on foreign oil has decreased every single year. In fact, in 2010, for the first time in thirteen years, less than half the petroleum we consumed was imported. Part of that is because we’re producing more oil here at home than at any time in the last eight years. But we can’t just drill our way out of this problem. While we consume 20 percent of the world’s oil, we only have 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’ve got to develop new technology that will help us use new forms of energy. That’s been a priority of mine as President. And because of the investments we’ve made, our use of clean, renewable energy has nearly doubled – and thousands of Americans have jobs because of it. Now we need to keep at it. And to do that, we need to make the right choices. Here’s one we can make right now. Every year, $4 billion of your tax dollars go to subsidizing the oil industry. These are the same companies making record profits – tens of billions of dollars a year. I don’t think oil companies need more corporate welfare. Congress should end this taxpayer giveaway. If you agree with me, I’m asking you to e-mail, call, or Tweet your representative. Tell them to stop fighting for oil companies. Tell them to start fighting for working families. Tell them to fight for the clean energy future that’s within our reach. Because the sooner we all get started, the sooner we’ll get there together.
[What I'm not telling you: It's fairly easy to slant the numbers in my favor; I only tell you part of the story!! That line:
"....America's dependence on foreign oil has decreased every year...."
is as phony as my most recent birth certificate!! The 'dependency' numbers are decreasing primarily due to fuel prices climbing ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT since my immaculation, three LONG years ago!! Don't forget too, unemployed workers drive far less than those employed; given the true unemployment rate (U-6) nearing 15%, that means alot'ta folks! With my extensions, unemployment payments have become a personal revenue stream, in-turn creating a whole-new dependency class in America. And by extension, a whole new class of owe-bama supporters!!
To continue--and to re-double--my efforts at fossil fuel vilification, it's necessary to 'go after' the oil companies incessantly. That $4 billion in subsidies is a mere 'drop-in-the-bucket' when considered against the total of my wasteful spending!! That would be .00259 OF ONE PERCENT of the total 15.42 TRILLION in national debt!! Seems kinda' silly to bitch about that doesn't it?!? Well, the KoolAid drinkers among my subjects believe everything I say, and "four-billion" sounds like a huge number when left to stand alone! Even if the Congress were to reduce the oil subsidies by 50%, not only would the savings be comparatively infintesimal, it would cause another substantial increase in the retail pump-price of both major highway fuels. That "....more corporate welfare...." statement: More oil industry vilification. The federal payments to the oil companies are nothing more, nothing less than pass-thru retail price subsidies; very much akin to the $7,500-$10,000 I pay each-and-every sucker who buys a Volt instead of a Corvette!!
If you really want to have an effect on your personal 'bottom line' contact your Senators and Respresentatives to express your support of the subsidies which will continue to insure a reduced pump price of fuel you need every day!! True, that reduced price will not have a great affect so long as the Regime's non-existant energy policy continues to push fuel prices ever upward!!]
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
March 3, 2012
Earlier this week, I spent some time with the hardworking men and women of the American auto industry, who are busy writing a new chapter in America’s story. Just a few years ago, their industry was shedding hundreds of thousands of jobs. Two of the Big Three – GM and Chrysler – were on the brink of failure. If we had let this great American industry collapse – if we had let Detroit go bankrupt – more than one million Americans would have lost their jobs in the middle of the worst recession since the Great Depression. I refused to let that happen. These jobs are worth more than just a paycheck – they’re a source of pride and a ticket to the middle class. These companies are worth more than just the cars they build – they’re a symbol of American innovation and a source of our manufacturing might. So in exchange for help, we demanded responsibility. We got the companies to retool and restructure. Everyone sacrificed. And three years later, the American auto industry is back. Today, GM is the number one automaker in the world. Chrysler is growing faster in America than any other car company. Ford is investing billions in American plants and factories, and plans to bring thousands of jobs back home. All told, the entire industry has added more than 200,000 new jobs over the past two and a half years. And they’re not just building cars again – they’re building better cars. Thanks to new fuel efficiency standards we put in place, they’re building cars that will average nearly 55 miles per gallon by the middle of the next decade. That’s almost double what they get today. That means folks will be able to fill up every two weeks instead of every week, saving the typical family more than $8,000 at the pump over time. That’s a big deal, especially as families are yet again feeling the pinch from rising gas prices. So what’s happening in Detroit will make a difference. But it won’t solve everything. There’s no silver bullet for avoiding spikes in gas prices every year. There’s no shortcut to taking control of our energy future. We have to pursue an all-of-the-above strategy that helps develop every source of American energy. And we have to do it now.
[What I'm not telling you: No one seems to question why I never visit auto manufacturing plants in Tennessee, Kentucky, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana or Texas. I'll tell'ya why: Because I don't own them, they're primarily foreign-badged manufacturers!! If I didn't own General--or 'Government'--Motors and Chrysler, it's doubtful I'd visit Michigan either, with the exception of the on-going union rewards built into the bailout PORKulus bill.
It's very easy to hypothesize about "cudda; wudda; shudda!" We can 'manufacture' various numbers of jobs that would have 'disappeared' had we not bailed out GM and Chrysler. And, what did the American taxpayer, the American investor get for their investment?!? They got the shaft.... that's what they got!! The American investor watched as George Soros and the Regime rewarded the United Auto Workers union with a 37% ownership stake in General Motors while--simultaneously--the federal government underwrote the UAW--underwater--Health and Retirement program. The American investor was rewarded for their confidence in the viability of GM prior to the federal takeover with a reasonable return on investment (ROI). As a result of the federal takeover, those investors--primarily the bond investors--were rewarded with the loss of 96-98 cents on every dollar invested!! The screwing the American taxpayer took on the Chrysler bailout was of collosal proportions! They essentially bailed out a foreign company--Fiat which owns 58% of Chrysler--and negotiated with the UAW to give the remainder to that union's Health Care Trust.
Had the owe-bama Regime let both auto companies proceed into bankruptcy as it should have, it's doubtful that 'a million jobs' would have been lost. While there may have been extensive lay-offs, a vast majority of those would have been recalled to work, post-bankruptcy. The end result of the bankruptcy procedures would have been leaner, meaner far more efficient manufacturing facilities, nationwide! Both companies' product quality would have improved--to compete with the likes of Honda, Toyota, Kia, Land Rover, et al--which would have generated greater sales, worldwide. We can--and will--brag that General Motors--as a conglomerate--is the largest car maker in the world. But how does the top Buick model's sales compare with those of the Honda Accord, for example?!?
As a sidebar, have you seen the affects of Regime--and by 'Regime,' I mean George Soros' orders--support for alternative energy sources?!? Every one I've touched has collapsed "in a pile of rubble," financially!! First, we proped up Solyndra and their 'sister' companies with billions-of-TAXPAYER-dollars, only to have them enter into bankruptcy shortly thereafter. Now we come to the Chevy Volt. The only way Chevy could sell them is to have the federal taxpayer underwrite about 20% of the purchase price, with the $7,500-$10,000 rebate per vehicle!! That wasn't enough to forestall a five-week plant shutdown.
(Note: Add $8,000 to the Volt's retail price of $41,000 and you could drive away in a new '12 CORVETTE!!)
The Volt--with it's on-going battery problems, coupled with it's 25-mile electric range--seems destined to go the way of Solyndra!! Apparently the GM hierarchy feels the same way. They're preparing to manufacture both the Chevy Chevelle and Impala in the Volt's Hamtramck, Mi., plant next year.
Sure fuel price spikes do happen every Spring The 2012 price-spike is very early in the season, exacerbated by the Regime's complete lack of a viable energy policy. Oh, don't get me wrong: We do have an energy policy. Castigate fossil fuels in favor of those currently unsustainable--without government financial intervention--'green' energy sources. Some reliable studies--that Soros and I, even with our investments in Brazilian oil, do not subscribe to--have concluded that fossil fuels are a RENEWABLE RESOURCE!! As is the norm, I continue the bold-faced lie that the United States only has 2% of the earth's energy supplies!! If I were the least-bit concerned with the truth, I'd have to repeat the new slogan: "The United States is the Saudi Arabia of natural gas!!" Seemingly--much to my chagrin--we almost daily discover new and larger gas fields.... all over the country, from the oil fields of the Dakotas to the Marcellus Shale gas fields of the Northeast!! If George Soros, the Regime and me, personally, are not successful--soon--in vilifying fossil fuels in favor of those unsustainable 'green' sources, I fear we will have lost our chance! Said vilification is essential in 'the spread of socialism of America!!']
The good news is, we’ve been making progress. Take a look at this chart. Six years ago, 60% of the oil we used was imported. Since I took office, America’s dependence on foreign oil has decreased every single year. In fact, in 2010, for the first time in thirteen years, less than half the petroleum we consumed was imported. Part of that is because we’re producing more oil here at home than at any time in the last eight years. But we can’t just drill our way out of this problem. While we consume 20 percent of the world’s oil, we only have 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. We’ve got to develop new technology that will help us use new forms of energy. That’s been a priority of mine as President. And because of the investments we’ve made, our use of clean, renewable energy has nearly doubled – and thousands of Americans have jobs because of it. Now we need to keep at it. And to do that, we need to make the right choices. Here’s one we can make right now. Every year, $4 billion of your tax dollars go to subsidizing the oil industry. These are the same companies making record profits – tens of billions of dollars a year. I don’t think oil companies need more corporate welfare. Congress should end this taxpayer giveaway. If you agree with me, I’m asking you to e-mail, call, or Tweet your representative. Tell them to stop fighting for oil companies. Tell them to start fighting for working families. Tell them to fight for the clean energy future that’s within our reach. Because the sooner we all get started, the sooner we’ll get there together.
[What I'm not telling you: It's fairly easy to slant the numbers in my favor; I only tell you part of the story!! That line:
"....America's dependence on foreign oil has decreased every year...."
is as phony as my most recent birth certificate!! The 'dependency' numbers are decreasing primarily due to fuel prices climbing ONE-HUNDRED PERCENT since my immaculation, three LONG years ago!! Don't forget too, unemployed workers drive far less than those employed; given the true unemployment rate (U-6) nearing 15%, that means alot'ta folks! With my extensions, unemployment payments have become a personal revenue stream, in-turn creating a whole-new dependency class in America. And by extension, a whole new class of owe-bama supporters!!
To continue--and to re-double--my efforts at fossil fuel vilification, it's necessary to 'go after' the oil companies incessantly. That $4 billion in subsidies is a mere 'drop-in-the-bucket' when considered against the total of my wasteful spending!! That would be .00259 OF ONE PERCENT of the total 15.42 TRILLION in national debt!! Seems kinda' silly to bitch about that doesn't it?!? Well, the KoolAid drinkers among my subjects believe everything I say, and "four-billion" sounds like a huge number when left to stand alone! Even if the Congress were to reduce the oil subsidies by 50%, not only would the savings be comparatively infintesimal, it would cause another substantial increase in the retail pump-price of both major highway fuels. That "....more corporate welfare...." statement: More oil industry vilification. The federal payments to the oil companies are nothing more, nothing less than pass-thru retail price subsidies; very much akin to the $7,500-$10,000 I pay each-and-every sucker who buys a Volt instead of a Corvette!!
If you really want to have an effect on your personal 'bottom line' contact your Senators and Respresentatives to express your support of the subsidies which will continue to insure a reduced pump price of fuel you need every day!! True, that reduced price will not have a great affect so long as the Regime's non-existant energy policy continues to push fuel prices ever upward!!]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
