[Partial] Analysis of obama's July First Blather, American University

Blather Analysis; American University, Washington, D.C., July First.
[The necessity has arisen to analyze as many blather opportunities as time allows.  This necessity may be of three prongs; the blantant lies told by the chief executive, the teleprompter operator or the various speech writers.  In any case, it's not ours to determine where the fault lies but to lace the speech with logic and forgotten facts.]
    Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.) Everyone please have a seat. Thank you very much. Let me thank Pastor Hybels from near my hometown in Chicago, who took time off his vacation to be here today. We are blessed to have him.

    I want to thank President Neil Kerwin and our hosts here at American University; acknowledge my outstanding Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, and members of my administration; all the members of Congress -- Hilda deserves applause. (Applause.) To all the members of Congress, the elected officials, faith and law enforcement, labor, business leaders and immigration advocates who are here today -- thank you for your presence.
    I want to thank American University for welcoming me to the campus once again. Some may recall that the last time I was here I was joined by a dear friend, and a giant of American politics, Senator Edward Kennedy. (Applause.) Teddy’s not here right now, but his legacy of civil rights and health care and worker protections is still with us.
    I was a candidate for President that day, and some may recall I argued that our country had reached a tipping point; that after years in which we had deferred our most pressing problems, and too often yielded to the politics of the moment, we now faced a choice: We could squarely confront our challenges with honesty and determination, or we could consign ourselves and our children to a future less prosperous and less secure. [Thus far, confrontation of the economy, jobs, illegal immigration, et al, have been ineffective at best!  The federal borrowing levels have so mortgaged the futures of upcoming generations as to be unmanageable!]
    I believed that then and I believe it now. And that’s why, even as we’ve tackled the most severe economic crisis since the Great Depression, even as we’ve wound down the war in Iraq and refocused our efforts in Afghanistan, my administration has refused to ignore some of the fundamental challenges facing this generation.  We launched the most aggressive education reforms in decades, so that our children can gain the knowledge and skills they need to compete in a 21st century global economy.  [Education reforms--at the federal level--are oxymoronic, at best!!  There is neither education nor reform.  The individual citizen's formal educational structure is best served at the lowest level possible:  the state level; the county level; the city, town, village level; the school district level.  The grade school/high school level is best served by the district; the community college level is best served by the city and/or county;  the four-year college and beyond are best served at the state level.  The primary benefit of the federal level is for revisionists; to revise history to suit the political party and political objectives currently in vogue.]
    We have finally delivered on the promise of health reform -– reform that will bring greater security to every American, and that will rein in the skyrocketing costs that threaten families, businesses and the prosperity of our nation.  [That delivery involved going against the wishes of nearly sixty percent of American adults.  The skyrocketing costs are being transfered to the 55% of Americans who actually pay taxes; wealth redistribution!!]
We’re on the verge of reforming an outdated and ineffective set of rules governing Wall Street -– to give greater power to consumers and prevent the reckless financial speculation that led to this severe recession.  [Freedom made the American economy THE greatest economy on the planet.  While we still have the geatest economy, federal spending at current rates will do no more than force us into "third-world rathole" status.  Great risk can yield great rewards; no risk will certainly yield NO REWARDS.] 
And we’re accelerating the transition to a clean energy economy by significantly raising the fuel-efficiency standards of cars and trucks, and by doubling our use of renewable energies like wind and solar power -- steps that have the potential to create whole new industries and hundreds of thousands of new jobs in America. [These new fuel efficiency standards do a couple of things:  The vehicles will cost more than previous models; the vehicles will be less safe due to materials substitution.  More plastic, less steel CAN NOT meet the same safety standards as previous models.   Potential {definition}: Something possessing the capacity for growth or development.   Neither wind no solar energy production are sustainable without massive federal subsidies!  Much more R&D is necessary to advance to the arena of profitability; who is expected to pay for that??  These 'hundreds of thousands' of new jobs are at the expense of hundreds of thousands of existing jobs in PROFITABLE industries.  The liberal position is that the fossil fuels industries and useage thereof, GO AWAY.  Where is the net positive affect to the American taxpayer?]
So, despite the forces of the status quo, despite the polarization and the frequent pettiness of our politics, we are confronting the great challenges of our times. And while this work isn’t easy, and the changes we seek won’t always happen overnight, what we’ve made clear is that this administration will not just kick the can down the road.  [NOT "kicking the can down the road" would involve federal deficit control, federal spending control, economic stabilizing personal and business tax policies and not "rocking the fiscal boat."  Essentially, all this administration has done IS kick the can down the road for future generations to ATTEMPT to fund!!]
Immigration reform is no exception. In recent days, the issue of immigration has become once more a source of fresh contention in our country, with the passage of a controversial law in Arizona and the heated reactions we’ve seen across America. Some have rallied behind this new policy. Others have protested and launched boycotts of the state. And everywhere, people have expressed frustration with a system that seems fundamentally broken.  [Nearly all of the national politicians--to include the executive branch--did NOT READ the SEVENTEEN pages of the Arizona immigration law.  This law is nearly a duplicate of the federal statute which the executive branch is reluctant to enforce.  Some of the many falsehoods spread about the Arizona statute are that it promotes radial profiling, it's a racist law and it's unconstitutional. All so much balderdash!!] 
Of course, the tensions around immigration are not new. On the one hand, we’ve always defined ourselves as a nation of immigrants -- a nation that welcomes those willing to embrace America’s precepts. Indeed, it is this constant flow of immigrants that helped to make America what it is. The scientific breakthroughs of Albert Einstein, the inventions of Nikola Tesla, the great ventures of Andrew Carnegie’s U.S. Steel and Sergey Brin’s Google, Inc. -– all this was possible because of immigrants.  [The reference to immigrants left out one important word: LEGAL!!  Mister Einstein from Germany; Mister Tesla from Croatia; Mister Carnegie from Scotland; Mister Brin from Russia; legal immigrants, all.  One would have to look far and wide to find ANYone opposed to immigration-LEGAL immigration.]
And then there are the countless names and the quiet acts that never made the history books but were no less consequential in building this country -- the generations who braved hardship and great risk to reach our shores in search of a better life for themselves and their families; the millions of people, ancestors to most of us, who believed that there was a place where they could be, at long last, free to work and worship and live their lives in peace. [{Sidebar:  Some of my people were here, waiting for your people to get off the boat!!}  America was--and is--a desired destination for those who want a better life than they left in their home countries.  These immigrants were the primary engine of innovation in the 19th and 20th centuries; their opportunities limitless.  They arrived at "the front door" and sacrificed to learn that necessary for citizenship.  They did NOT "swim the river" to arrive illegally, in some cases, many times!!]
So this steady stream of hardworking and talented people has made America the engine of the global economy and a beacon of hope around the world. And it’s allowed us to adapt and thrive in the face of technological and societal change. To this day, America reaps incredible economic rewards because we remain a magnet for the best and brightest from across the globe. Folks travel here in the hopes of being a part of a culture of entrepreneurship and ingenuity, and by doing so they strengthen and enrich that culture. Immigration also means we have a younger workforce -– and a faster-growing economy -- than many of our competitors. And in an increasingly interconnected world, the diversity of our country is a powerful advantage in global competition. [There are few if any, complaints that immigrants--legal or illegal--aren't hard workers.  They are!!  We're reaping the economic rewards of lawn care, household workers, construction workers, etc, at a wage far less than a citizen will work for.  World interconnectivity is primarily a result of NAFTA, outsourcing to India, outsourcing to China, outsourcing to Central and South America {when do you want me to stop?}.  How does this 'innovation' grow the American economy, produce a younger workforce that doesn't run when they see a uniform??]
Just a few weeks ago, we had an event of small business owners at the White House. And one business owner was a woman named Prachee Devadas who came to this country, became a citizen, and opened up a successful technology services company. When she started, she had just one employee. Today, she employs more than a hundred people. This past April, we held a naturalization ceremony at the White House for members of our armed forces. Even though they were not yet citizens, they had enlisted. One of them was a woman named Perla Ramos -- born and raised in Mexico, came to the United States shortly after 9/11, and she eventually joined the Navy. And she said, “I take pride in our flag and the history that forged this great nation and the history we write day by day.”  [I don't really see the point with the two business owners.  obama routinely trots out individuals to make his case.  I for one, fail to see how these two business owners make his case for amnesty.  If the president were truely honest--which he is not--he'd "call a spade, a spade" and refer to his immigration policy to amnesty, not hide behind the comouflage of "comprehensive immigration reform-a euphemism for amnesty!!  I'm sure these military folks he trotted out, followed the immigration rules, how else could they have enlisted into their chosen military branch??]
These women, and men and women across this country like them, remind us that immigrants have always helped to build and defend this country -– and that being an American is not a matter of blood or birth. It’s a matter of faith. It’s a matter of fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear. That’s what makes us unique. That’s what makes us strong. Anybody can help us write the next great chapter in our history.  [Has the president ever read the document he swore to protect and defend??  I think not!! 

1. The 1st Amendment:  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
2. "The 14th Amendment: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Had he read the document, obama would know that religion, faith or fidelity have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with citizenship, or lack thereof.  It IS about blood; it IS about birth; it IS about legal entry!!   

Now, we can’t forget that this process of immigration and eventual inclusion has often been painful. Each new wave of immigrants has generated fear and resentments towards newcomers, particularly in times of economic upheaval. Our founding was rooted in the notion that America was unique as a place of refuge and freedom for, in Thomas Jefferson’s words, “oppressed humanity.” But the ink on our Constitution was barely dry when, amidst conflict, Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts, which placed harsh restrictions of those suspected of having foreign allegiances. A century ago, immigrants from Ireland, Italy, Poland, other European countries were routinely subjected to rank discrimination and ugly stereotypes. Chinese immigrants were held in detention and deported from Angel Island in the San Francisco Bay. They didn’t even get to come in.
[Every ethnic group in America has suffered discrimination and stereotypes-practically all of us can cite instances of them.  Does that make it right?? Of course not-it's the human nature of some.  Of course it's painful to pick up oneself and/or family and go off into 'the unknown.'  It happens to a five-year-old on their first day of school; do we protect them from the unknown, or allow them to grow from the experience; to make each subsequent encounter less emotional??
Note:  The Alien and Sedition Acts were four bills passed in 1798 by the Federalists in the 5th United States Congress during an undeclared naval war with France, later known as the Quasi-War. They were signed into law by President John Adams. Proponents claimed the acts were designed to protect the Catholics from alien citizens of enemy powers and to prevent seditious attacks from weakening the government. ]
To begin with, our borders have been porous for decades. Obviously, the problem is greatest along our Southern border, but it’s not restricted to that part of the country. In fact, because we don’t do a very good job of tracking who comes in and out of the country as visitors, large numbers avoid immigration laws simply by overstaying their visas. [The excuse "Well, they never did it before" is not good enough anymore.  Because they have been, certainly doesn't mean they should be porous in the present or in the future.  The executive branch has been less than lax in demanding that visa expirations be monitored and acted upon.] 
The result is an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. The overwhelming majority of these men and women are simply seeking a better life for themselves and their children. Many settle in low-wage sectors of the economy; they work hard, they save, they stay out of trouble. But because they live in the shadows, they’re vulnerable to unscrupulous businesses who pay them less than the minimum wage or violate worker safety rules -– thereby putting companies who follow those rules, and Americans who rightly demand the minimum wage or overtime, at an unfair [dis]advantage. Crimes go unreported as victims and witnesses fear coming forward. And this makes it harder for the police to catch violent criminals and keep neighborhoods safe. And billions in tax revenue are lost each year because many undocumented workers are paid under the table.  [...and the euphemisms multiply: "undocumented immigrants; undocumented workers"  They're ILLEGAL!!  A more accurate estimate of the ILLEGAL ALIEN population is 18-20 million.  All those items concerning wages, living in the shadows, safety, unreported crimes are all true.  They don't warrant the same rights as citizens; they're ILLEGAL.  They must stay 'under the radar;' they're ILLEGAL.  If the obama regime survives long enough to get this desired AMNESTY, how will it help the economy??  More tax revenue will not help the economy; just another source of funds to mismanage.  Everyone in America is "seeking a better life for him and his family!!"  Until the the maturation of the "Baby-Boom" generation, every generation was better educated, better funded, better housed, than the generation before them.  Today, not so much!!  It's common for AMERICAN CITIZENS to "work under the table;" given the confiscatory tax rates-wait for the Bush Tax Cuts to expire and see what happens!!!] 
More fundamentally, the presence of so many illegal immigrants makes a mockery of all those who are going through the process of immigrating legally. Indeed, after years of patchwork fixes and ill-conceived revisions, the legal immigration system is as broken as the borders. Backlogs and bureaucracy means the process can take years. While an applicant waits for approval, he or she is often forbidden from visiting the United States –- which means even husbands and wives may be forced to spend many years apart. High fees and the need for lawyers may exclude worthy applicants. And while we provide students from around the world visas to get engineering and computer science degrees at our top universities, our laws discourage them from using those skills to start a business or power a new industry right here in the United States. Instead of training entrepreneurs to create jobs on our shores, we train our competition.  [The president must be a fundamentally flawed individual.  The mockery of naturalized citizens and legal immigrants is reason enough to reward ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS with AMNESTY??  ....and we thought biden was goofy!!  I'd like to see truly accurate details of how the legal immigration system is broken.  Backlogs would seem to be the result of inadequate quotas or bureaucratic inefficiencies-reason enough to reward ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS with AMNESTY??  The breakage at, and of, the borders is the result of decades of both political parties pushing their particular agendas.  The time for American soverignty to trump political agendas is long overdue!! During President Bush's administration border walls and enhanced fencing were approved and funded by the congress.  Where are they now??  Why are they not completed??  Would they not provided desparately needed jobs??  Would they not improve the local and regional economies??  Those who are educated in American can do with their educations whatever and WHERE EVER {legally} they want to!!  How many of those holding student visas actually apply for citizenship??  There are those who have allegience to their home countries.  What's the harm in that??  Why must everyone who comes to the United States, want to live here??]  
In sum, the system is broken. And everybody knows it. Unfortunately, reform has been held hostage to political posturing and special-interest wrangling -– and to the pervasive sentiment in Washington that tackling such a thorny and emotional issue is inherently bad politics.

Just a few years ago, when I was a senator, we forged a bipartisan coalition in favor of comprehensive reform. Under the leadership of Senator Kennedy, who had been a longtime champion of immigration reform, and Senator John McCain, we worked across the aisle to help pass a bipartisan bill through the Senate. But that effort eventually came apart. And now, under the pressures of partisanship and election-year politics, many of the 11 Republican senators who voted for reform in the past have now backed away from their previous support. [Bipartisan.....shmipartisan!!  Just a sure-fire way to have someone else to blame when the whole thing "goes to Hell in a hand-basket!!"  obama needs to consider the wants of the majority of Americans {some hispanics, included].  Rasmussen polling indicates that 74% of Americans believe the goverment is not doing enough to secure the borders!!  Surely, those eleven senators came to their senses and acknowledged the desires of nearly THREE-QUARTERS of American voters!!]

Into this breach, states like Arizona have decided to take matters into their own hands. Given the levels of frustration across the country, this is understandable. But it is also ill conceived. And it’s not just that the law Arizona passed is divisive -– although it has fanned the flames of an already contentious debate. Laws like Arizona’s put huge pressures on local law enforcement to enforce rules that ultimately are unenforceable. It puts pressure on already hard-strapped state and local budgets. It makes it difficult for people here illegally to report crimes -– driving a wedge between communities and law enforcement, making our streets more dangerous and the jobs of our police officers more difficult.
[Understandibly, Arizona SHOULD have taken matters into their own hands.  On the entire planet, Pheonix is second only to Mexico City in kidnappings!!!!  "...rules that ultimately are unenforceable...."  Mr obama, when can the American populus expect your resignation??  Clearly, you're not up to the task!!  You've sworn to protect America from enemies, foreign and domestic; you can't think of a way to protect and defend the southern borders??  Aw... come on... Think about it!!  Ever hear of the United States Army... The Marine Corps {thats 'core' not 'corpse'}??  I'm thinkin' about 40......50 thousand of 'em aught'ta do the trick!!  And ya might consider an additional 5 to 8 thousand of 'em for Arizona's Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge to clean out the drug smugglers and human trafficers proven to have taken control of that area.]

And you don’t have to take my word for this. You can speak to the police chiefs and others from law enforcement here today who will tell you the same thing.  These laws also have the potential of violating the rights of innocent American citizens and legal residents, making them subject to possible stops or questioning because of what they look like or how they sound. And as other states and localities go their own ways, we face the prospect that different rules for immigration will apply in different parts of the country -– a patchwork of local immigration rules where we all know one clear national standard is needed. [I've been to Arizona!!  Everybody but the governor looks hispanic!!  As such, the local and state cops in Arizona know what and who to look for;  they don't just go willy-nilly about the countryside shakin' down everyone they see, as obama would have the public believe!!  As the law demands, they don't verify anyone they haven't stopped for some other reason.  Arizona's immigration law is in place only after years of begging the federal government to enforce the federal law currently in place!!]

Our task then is to make our national laws actually work -– to shape a system that reflects our values as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. And that means being honest about the problem, and getting past the false debates that divide the country rather than bring it together.   For example, there are those in the immigrants’ rights community who have argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are [here] illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws on the books and put an end to deportation until we have better laws. And often this argument is framed in moral terms: Why should we punish people who are just trying to earn a living?   I recognize the sense of compassion that drives this argument, but I believe such an indiscriminate approach would be both unwise and unfair. It would suggest to those thinking about coming here illegally that there will be no repercussions for such a decision. And this could lead to a surge in more illegal immigration. And it would also ignore the millions of people around the world who are waiting in line to come here legally.   Ultimately, our nation, like all nations, has the right and obligation to control its borders and set laws for residency and citizenship. And no matter how decent they are, no matter their reasons, the 11 million who broke these laws should be held accountable.
Here again, obama leaves out that all-important word: "LEGAL," as in immigrants.  How can the executive branch be allowed to provide less-than-adequate enforcement of  current immigration legislation as they clearly are??  Why not extend this lack of enforcement to other laws; restrictive gun ownership; murder; kidnapping; rape... and on and on??  You get the point-laws are on the federal 'books' to be enforced with integrity and enthusiasm, not the current lackadaisical fashion.  The laws were not enacted to "punish people who are just trying to make a living," only to punish and/or deport those who enter The United States ILLEGALLY!

"...should be held accountable..."  MUST INCLUDE detection and deportation at a minimum, as the law provides!!  By the way... that's 18-20 MILLION!!]            

Now, if the majority of Americans are skeptical of a blanket amnesty, they are also skeptical that it is possible to round up and deport 11 million people. They know it’s not possible. Such an effort would be logistically impossible and wildly expensive. Moreover, it would tear at the very fabric of this nation -– because immigrants who are here illegally are now intricately woven into that fabric. Many have children who are American citizens. Some are children themselves, brought here by their parents at a very young age, growing up as American kids, only to discover their illegal status when they apply for college or a job. Migrant workers -– mostly here illegally -– have been the labor force of our farmers and agricultural producers for generations. So even if it was possible, a program of mass deportations would disrupt our economy and communities in ways that most Americans would find intolerable.
[Of course the aforementioned 74% of Americans DO NOT believe the 'roundup' task is impossible!!  Those with a military background will more understand how the process would work; those with minuscule executive experience would not.  Have you watched those 'war movies' where the soldiers are tasked with clearing a building of bad guys?  They do it one room at a time; continually protecting their squad-mates in the process.  The deportation process would be much the same way; starting in the northern-most states, "clearing" each state, one state at a time.  As the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS flee detection, they'll be fleeing toward their home countries, making the process that much easier!!  Just think of the vast numbers of jobs that would free up for unemployed Americans!!  Of course-silly man, there'll be disruptions, mostly wage negotiations for the Americans who apply for the resultant jobs.] 

Now, once we get past the two poles of this debate, it becomes possible to shape a practical, common-sense approach that reflects our heritage and our values. Such an approach demands accountability from everybody -– from government, from businesses and from individuals.   Government has a threshold responsibility to secure our borders. That’s why I directed my Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano -- a former border governor -- to improve our enforcement policy without having to wait for a new law.
[I can find one problem with this 'approach' obama's suggesting:  His "heritage and values" ARE NOT the "heritage and values" of the 74% of Americans who want border security enhanced to an acceptable level.  obama MUST install a dictionary function to the teleprompter's operating software.  My "Funk & Wagnalls" says that THRESHOLD means "a place or point of beginning; an outset."  The government's responsibility in border security is far more inclusive than a point of beginning!  Come ON, obama!!  I doubt that even you believe that!!  Holding up Secretary Napolitano as an asset is NOT HELPING your case; as Arizona Governor, Ms Napolitano DID NOTHING about ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION; DID NOTHING about KIDNAPPINGS; DID NOTHING about ILLEGAL DRUG SMUGGLERS; DID NOTHING about HUMAN TRAFFICING!!!  I'm not so sure she will be of help in making your case, flimsy as it is!!   Arizona's current governor "took the reins" and did what should have been done decades ago!!  Now that they have your attention, INFORCE THE LAW!!]

Today, we have more boots on the ground near the Southwest border than at any time in our history. Let me repeat that: We have more boots on the ground on the Southwest border than at any time in our history. We doubled the personnel assigned to Border Enforcement Security Task Forces. We tripled the number of intelligence analysts along the border. For the first time, we’ve begun screening 100 percent of southbound rail shipments. And as a result, we’re seizing more illegal guns, cash and drugs than in years past. Contrary to some of the reports that you see, crime along the border is down. And statistics collected by Customs and Border Protection reflect a significant reduction in the number of people trying to cross the border illegally.   [I don't doubt that there are more agents on the border than ever before, but that doesn't tell the whole story.  What kinds of "strangleholds" are they forced to operate under??  "...screenig 100% of SOUTHBOUND rail shipments...." it's idiotic to concentrate the manpower and energies to southbound traffic!  The Mexican government have border security, immigration and importation regulations far more stringent and better enforced than we do-it's Mexico's responsibility.  Our responsibility is NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC!!  I sincerely doubt many ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS are clamoring to get INTO MEXICO!!  mister obama.... if you insist on continuing these blatant falsehoods, at least make them believable!!  We all can read!!  Any South Texas, Arizona, southern California newspaper will refute your border-crime statistics!!]
So the bottom line is this: The southern border is more secure today than at any time in the past 20 years. That doesn’t mean we don’t have more work to do. We have to do that work, but it’s important that we acknowledge the facts. Even as we are committed to doing what’s necessary to secure our borders, even without passage of the new law, there are those who argue that we should not move forward with any other elements of reform until we have fully sealed our borders. But our borders are just too vast for us to be able to solve the problem only with fences and border patrols. It won’t work. Our borders will not be secure as long as our limited resources are devoted to not only stopping gangs and potential terrorists, but also the hundreds of thousands who attempt to cross each year simply to find work.
[Let me quote mister obama's own words in a previous paragraph:  "To begin with, our borders have been porous for decades"   Which is it: Are we porous or are we secure?  Prior to this administration, The United States and it's citizens were not a group to whom a problem was "just too vast for to be able to solve...."  It is not in the American lexicon that something "won't work!!"  If that were the case, there'd be NO transcontinental railroad, NO government- owned auto company,  NO Boeing Aircraft, NO Microsoft, NO Google-need I continue?? obama has to {figuratively} "shit, or get off the pot!!"  Either he's up-to-the-task, or he ain't!!]

That’s why businesses must be held accountable if they break the law by deliberately hiring and exploiting undocumented workers. We’ve already begun to step up enforcement against the worst workplace offenders. And we’re implementing and improving a system to give employers a reliable way to verify that their employees are here legally. But we need to do more. We cannot continue just to look the other way as a significant portion of our economy operates outside the law. It breeds abuse and bad practices. It punishes employers who act responsibly and undercuts American workers. And ultimately, if the demand for undocumented workers falls, the incentive for people to come here illegally will decline as well.
[I have to stop here!!!  I can do no more today!!  The blather is too much; the truths-too few!!  I have a life-I intend to live it; we'll try this again tomorrow!!]

Finally, we have to demand responsibility from people living here illegally. They must be required to admit that they broke the law. They should be required to register, pay their taxes, pay a fine, and learn English. They must get right with the law before they can get in line and earn their citizenship -- not just because it is fair, not just because it will make clear to those who might wish to come to America they must do so inside the bounds of the law, but because this is how we demonstrate that being -- what being an American means. Being a citizen of this country comes not only with rights but also with certain fundamental responsibilities. We can create a pathway for legal status that is fair, reflective of our values, and works.

Now, stopping illegal immigration must go hand in hand with reforming our creaky system of legal immigration. We’ve begun to do that, by eliminating a backlog in background checks that at one point stretched back almost a year. That’s just for the background check. People can now track the status of their immigration applications by email or text message. We’ve improved accountability and safety in the detention system. And we’ve stemmed the increases in naturalization fees. But here, too, we need to do more. We should make it easier for the best and the brightest to come to start businesses and develop products and create jobs.

Our laws should respect families following the rules -– instead of splitting them apart. We need to provide farms a legal way to hire the workers they rely on, and a path for those workers to earn legal status. And we should stop punishing innocent young people for the actions of their parents by denying them the chance to stay here and earn an education and contribute their talents to build the country where they’ve grown up. The DREAM Act would do this, and that’s why I supported this bill as a state legislator and as a U.S. senator -- and why I continue to support it as president.

So these are the essential elements of comprehensive immigration reform. The question now is whether we will have the courage and the political will to pass a bill through Congress, to finally get it done. Last summer, I held a meeting with leaders of both parties, including many of the Republicans who had supported reform in the past -- and some who hadn’t. I was pleased to see a bipartisan framework proposed in the Senate by Senators Lindsey Graham and Chuck Schumer, with whom I met to discuss this issue. I’ve spoken with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus to plot the way forward and meet -- and then I met with them earlier this week.

And I’ve spoken with representatives from a growing coalition of labor unions and business groups, immigrant advocates and community organizations, law enforcement, local government -– all who recognize the importance of immigration reform. And I’ve met with leaders from America’s religious communities, like Pastor Hybels -- people of different faiths and beliefs, some liberal, some conservative, who nonetheless share a sense of urgency; who understand that fixing our broken immigration system is not only a political issue, not just an economic issue, but a moral imperative as well.

So we’ve made progress. I’m ready to move forward; the majority of Democrats are ready to move forward; and I believe the majority of Americans are ready to move forward. But the fact is, without bipartisan support, as we had just a few years ago, we cannot solve this problem. Reform that brings accountability to our immigration system cannot pass without Republican votes. That is the political and mathematical reality. The only way to reduce the risk that this effort will again falter because of politics is if members of both parties are willing to take responsibility for solving this problem once and for all.

And, yes, this is an emotional question, and one that lends itself to demagoguery. Time and again, this issue has been used to divide and inflame -– and to demonize people. And so the understandable, the natural impulse among those who run for office is to turn away and defer this question for another day, or another year, or another administration. Despite the courageous leadership in the past shown by many Democrats and some Republicans -- including, by the way, my predecessor, President Bush -– this has been the custom. That is why a broken and dangerous system that offends our most basic American values is still in place.

But I believe we can put politics aside and finally have an immigration system that’s accountable. I believe we can appeal not to people’s fears but to their hopes, to their highest ideals, because that’s who we are as Americans. It’s been inscribed on our nation’s seal since we declared our independence. “E pluribus unum.” Out of many, one. That is what has drawn the persecuted and impoverished to our shores. That’s what led the innovators and risk-takers from around the world to take a chance here in the land of opportunity. That’s what has led people to endure untold hardships to reach this place called America.

One of the largest waves of immigration in our history took place little more than a century ago. At the time, Jewish people were being driven out of Eastern Europe, often escaping to the sounds of gunfire and the light from their villages burning to the ground. The journey could take months, as families crossed rivers in the dead of night, traveled miles by foot, endured a rough and dangerous passage over the North Atlantic. Once here, many made their homes in a teeming and bustling Lower Manhattan.

It was at this time that a young woman named Emma Lazarus, whose own family fled persecution from Europe generations earlier, took up the cause of these new immigrants. Although she was a poet, she spent much of her time advocating for better health care and housing for the newcomers. And inspired by what she saw and heard, she wrote down her thoughts and donated a piece of work to help pay for the construction of a new statue -- the Statue of Liberty -- which actually was funded in part by small donations from people across America.

Years before the statue was built -- years before it would be seen by throngs of immigrants craning their necks skyward at the end of long and brutal voyage, years before it would come to symbolize everything that we cherish -- she imagined what it could mean. She imagined the sight of a giant statue at the entry point of a great nation -– but unlike the great monuments of the past, this would not signal an empire. Instead, it would signal one’s arrival to a place of opportunity and refuge and freedom.

“Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand,” she wrote,

A mighty woman with a torch…

From her beacon-hand

Glows world-wide welcome…

“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!”…

“Give me your tired, and your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to be free…

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Let us remember these words. For it falls on each generation to ensure that that lamp -– that beacon -– continues to shine as a source of hope around the world, and a source of our prosperity here at home.

Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America. Thank you. (Applause.)

END