Has "the Sarge-in-Charge" of the former Clinton News Network (CNN) lost his mind?!?!
Clearly reporting an obamacRAT gaff?!?!
Does the "Clown Prince" know this?!?!
Did George Soros approve this?!?!
The background, during the debate of October 19th:
- On the issue of whether creationism should be taught in public schools, a highly skeptical O'Donnell questioned Coon's assertion that the First Amendment calls for the separation of church and state.
- "The First Amendment does?" O'Donnell asked during the Tuesday morning debate. "Let me just clarify: You're telling me that the separation of church and state is found in the First Amendment?"
- Coons responded by quoting the relevant text: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."
- "That's in the First Amendment?" a still skeptical O'Donnell replied smiling, as laughter could be heard from the crowd.
(My)Reference #1:(*)
(My)Reference #2:(**)
(*) The phrase "separation of church and state" is generally traced to an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists, where Jefferson spoke of the combined effect of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. The metaphor was intended, as The U.S. Supreme Court has currently interpreted it since 1947, to mean that religion and government must stay separate for the benefit of both, including the idea that the government must not impose religion on Americans nor create any law requiring it.
(**) The first amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion", impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.
Certainly, Soros could not have approved this report; obama will approve whatever Soros tells him to approve!!
Does the American voter need any more proof??
Anyone who with a "d" after their name; the professed obamacRATs--actually ANY incumbent; 'governs' by the power achieved and the demands of the guy with the deepest pockets!!
In response the report: "Tea Party Nationalism" by The Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights (IREHR), NAACP President Benjamin Jealous says the NAACP does not “attack the tea party” or “call the tea party racist,” even though he supports the report which clearly does. (**) The Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights (IREHR) is funded in part by the liberal, socialist, fascist Firedoll Foundation.
Throughout most of it's 'life,' the NAACP has depended upon enlarging the racial divide as a method of increasing their membership and advancing their goals. The NAACP's major accomplishments:(*)
Til Nex'Time....
(**)The IREHR looked at a limited number of tea party “factions,” many loosely organized online or at the county-level. In addition, out a movement consisting of millions of Americans, the report singles out five individual self-proclaimed tea partiers for having ties to anti-Semitic, militia and white nationalist groups.
(*)'Affirmative Action,' which goes far beyond racial equality! It demands that the minorities among us acknowledge that anything they've attained, anything they hope to achieve--CAN NOT be done on their individual intelligence, their individual ingenuity, their individual desire to succeed!! They must have added points on any qualification test; they must be judged among themselves, NOT with the general population. This has done nothing more than to induce minorities to become more dependent upon the government tit.
(*)'Increased welfareRAT benefits,' which does more than anything else to destroy the recipients' will to succeed. Not only have the benefits been increased; the requirements have been greatly diminished--to greatly increase the rolls, which will equal greater numbers of democRAT voters......... IF the New Black Panthers can get 'em off the couch!!
No comments:
Post a Comment