Format Is Same For Vegas Debates
....and that format is:
Pick a liberal pamphleteer as moderator;
Pick a presumptive 'front-runner;'
That 'front-runner' need not be the most popular amongst the public, or leading in the polls; just has to be one of the very few that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" stands 'a ghost of a chance' of beating. (Polls show a "generic [no 'name-brand'] republicRAT" can easily defeat "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist.")
Use the other candidates to aid in vilifying the presumptive 'front-runner;'
Ignore Herman Cain as the statistical 'front-runner' while guiding the other candidates toward Mr Cain's vilification (A 'Cain candidacy' will nullify "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" race-baiting, racial injustice and racial economic injustice planks in his campaign platform).
I 'stayed with' the debate for about 45 minutes. After deciding there would be nothing new; that it's just 'more-of-the-same,' I gave up and watched something else. Any future debates must have a 'format' change! I suggest that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Davis or Mark Steyn moderate any future debates. If the subject of the questioning strays off topic (to vilify another's answer, position) turn off his (or her) microphone with a warning: "Stay on message; stop the personal attacks of fellow candidates." Thus far, the general theme is 'attack' rather than a clear, concise explanation of their positions on the important topics of the day; That Must Change!!