A Patriotic Response To The "Clown Prince;" 11/17/2012
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
November 17, 2012
On Tuesday, America went to the polls. And the message you sent was clear: you voted for action, not politics as usual. You elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours. That’s why I’ve invited leaders of both parties to the White House next week, so we can start to build consensus around challenges we can only solve together. I also intend to bring in business, labor and civic leaders from outside Washington to get their ideas and input as well. At a time when our economy is still recovering from the Great Recession, our top priority has to be jobs and growth. That’s the focus of the plan I talked about during the campaign. It’s a plan to reward businesses that create jobs here in America, and give people access to the education and training that those businesses are looking for. It’s a plan to rebuild our infrastructure and keep us on the cutting edge of innovation and clean energy. And it’s a plan to reduce our deficit in a balanced and responsible way. This is even more important because at the end of this year, we face a series of deadlines that require us to make major decisions about how to pay down our deficit – decisions that will have a huge impact on the economy and the middle class, now and in the future.
[What I'm not telling you: America did indeed go to the polls last Tuesday, but rather than vote for action--you didn't get during the first term of my regime--you chose the free-stuff I promised you contingent upon you promising me your vote. I spout lots of obama-isms about your choices at the polls, 100% of which are of my design NOT YOURS! The very slim majority of you chose the aforementioned free-stuff because you don't have jobs and have no inclination to look for one. barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
November 17, 2012
On Tuesday, America went to the polls. And the message you sent was clear: you voted for action, not politics as usual. You elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours. That’s why I’ve invited leaders of both parties to the White House next week, so we can start to build consensus around challenges we can only solve together. I also intend to bring in business, labor and civic leaders from outside Washington to get their ideas and input as well. At a time when our economy is still recovering from the Great Recession, our top priority has to be jobs and growth. That’s the focus of the plan I talked about during the campaign. It’s a plan to reward businesses that create jobs here in America, and give people access to the education and training that those businesses are looking for. It’s a plan to rebuild our infrastructure and keep us on the cutting edge of innovation and clean energy. And it’s a plan to reduce our deficit in a balanced and responsible way. This is even more important because at the end of this year, we face a series of deadlines that require us to make major decisions about how to pay down our deficit – decisions that will have a huge impact on the economy and the middle class, now and in the future.
Here we have to have the obama-finition of 'consensus:'
That's where I demand that republicRATics 'roll-over-and-play-dead' and agree with whatever bullshit scheme I dream up!
The aforementioned bullshit schemes include my failed attempt to sway America's energy future toward solar energy with cash to a couple of dozen SOLYNDRA-esque solar companies that went into bankruptcy within months of my bribes. The successful part of this solar scheme was rewarding my supporters and donors involved with those companies. The Bilderberg Group now asks hyou to forget the--again, FAILED--$787 BILLION PORKulus bill that was described as a measure to repair and/or replace the country's infrastructure. It too had a successful measure, that of rewarding union and contractor managements for their donations and support. Can there be any reason to believe my regime's second term will be any different....?? Well, maybe in ratcheting up the level of fraud!!]
Last year, I worked with Democrats and Republicans to cut a trillion
dollars’ worth of spending, and I intend to work with both parties to do more.
But as I said over and over again on the campaign trail, we can’t just cut our
way to prosperity. If we’re serious about reducing the deficit, we have to
combine spending cuts with revenue – and that means asking the wealthiest
Americans to pay a little more in taxes. That’s how we did it when Bill Clinton
was President. And that’s the only way we can afford to invest in education and
job training and manufacturing – all the ingredients of a strong middle class
and a strong economy. Already, I’ve put forward a detailed plan that allows us to make
these investments while reducing our deficit by $4 trillion over the next
decade. Now, I’m open to compromise and new ideas. But I refuse to accept any
approach that isn’t balanced. I will not ask students or seniors or middle-class
families to pay down the entire deficit while people making over $250,000 aren’t
asked to pay a dime more in taxes. This was a central question in the election.
And on Tuesday, we found out that the majority of Americans agree with my
approach – that includes Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. Now we need a majority in Congress to listen – and they should start
by making sure taxes don’t go up on the 98% of Americans making under $250,000 a
year starting January 1. This is something we all agree on. Even as we negotiate
a broader deficit reduction package, Congress should extend middle-class tax
cuts right now. It’s a step that would give millions of families and 97% of
small businesses the peace of mind that will lead to new jobs and faster growth.
There’s no reason to wait. We know there will be differences and disagreements in the months to
come. That’s part of what makes our political system work. But on Tuesday, you
said loud and clear that you won’t tolerate dysfunction, or politicians who see
compromise as a dirty word. Not when so many of your families are still
struggling. Instead, you want cooperation. You want action. That’s what I plan
to deliver in my second term, and I expect to find leaders from both parties
willing to join me.
[What I'm not telling you: The referenced trillion dollars in spending cuts.... just more of my accounting hocus-pocus, much like robbing $600 Billion from Medicare to make obamaKare look more financially attractive; counting those funds twice!! That "Slick-Willie" Clinton reference.... that was erogenous.... er, erroneous (sorry for that justified 'slip') at best!! "Slick-Willie" had a republicRATic Congress for most of his tenure; he had no choice in most matters-financial.
My referenced quote:
"We can't just cut our way to prosperity"
is just more of my usual blusterful bullshit! We have a far better chance of that than my desire of taxing our way to prosperity--which is just not economically nor mathmatically possible!! A previous blog has already made logical, sustainable, workable suggestions for serious tax code revisions, not that they'd ever be adopted. Where are the 'vote-buying' possibilities in that kid of revision?!? Given the fact that every budget proposal I've presented to Congress has not garnered ONE positive obamacRATic vote in the Senate, how much ya'wanna bet this $4 Trillion (which is a measly $400 Billion per year!) deficit cut will be approved; and if approved, ever be accomplished?!?
As I will continue obfuscate with class warfare, this bullshit that tax increases on those over $250k won't affect small business is PURE MALE-BOVINE FECES!!! The vast majority of small business owners will be adversely affected by my proposed demagoguery via the tax code. The affectations will sacrifice much needed current employment as money is removed from the private sector. The much more effective routes are to reduce the corporate income tax to ZERO; continue the obama-Bush tax RATES; then get the hell out'a the way and watch the revenues to roll into the treasury!
The reading I--and The Bilderberg Group--get from the last presidential election is the slim majority of the electorate want MORE OF THE SAME!! More of the same is what you shall get.... a direct route to totalitarian communism!!
On a more loical note: If General Motors was too big to fail; was a majority union company; was worthy of bailout.... why is Hostess Brands, Inc., (Twinkies, et al) with its' majority union employees, not worthy of a federal bailout?!? It wouldn't matter, Michelle Antoinette wouldn't allow it to continue making those (DELICIOUS) 'treats' anway!! I'm jus' sayin'!!]
[What I'm not telling you: The referenced trillion dollars in spending cuts.... just more of my accounting hocus-pocus, much like robbing $600 Billion from Medicare to make obamaKare look more financially attractive; counting those funds twice!! That "Slick-Willie" Clinton reference.... that was erogenous.... er, erroneous (sorry for that justified 'slip') at best!! "Slick-Willie" had a republicRATic Congress for most of his tenure; he had no choice in most matters-financial.
My referenced quote:
"We can't just cut our way to prosperity"
is just more of my usual blusterful bullshit! We have a far better chance of that than my desire of taxing our way to prosperity--which is just not economically nor mathmatically possible!! A previous blog has already made logical, sustainable, workable suggestions for serious tax code revisions, not that they'd ever be adopted. Where are the 'vote-buying' possibilities in that kid of revision?!? Given the fact that every budget proposal I've presented to Congress has not garnered ONE positive obamacRATic vote in the Senate, how much ya'wanna bet this $4 Trillion (which is a measly $400 Billion per year!) deficit cut will be approved; and if approved, ever be accomplished?!?
As I will continue obfuscate with class warfare, this bullshit that tax increases on those over $250k won't affect small business is PURE MALE-BOVINE FECES!!! The vast majority of small business owners will be adversely affected by my proposed demagoguery via the tax code. The affectations will sacrifice much needed current employment as money is removed from the private sector. The much more effective routes are to reduce the corporate income tax to ZERO; continue the obama-Bush tax RATES; then get the hell out'a the way and watch the revenues to roll into the treasury!
The reading I--and The Bilderberg Group--get from the last presidential election is the slim majority of the electorate want MORE OF THE SAME!! More of the same is what you shall get.... a direct route to totalitarian communism!!
On a more loical note: If General Motors was too big to fail; was a majority union company; was worthy of bailout.... why is Hostess Brands, Inc., (Twinkies, et al) with its' majority union employees, not worthy of a federal bailout?!? It wouldn't matter, Michelle Antoinette wouldn't allow it to continue making those (DELICIOUS) 'treats' anway!! I'm jus' sayin'!!]
No comments:
Post a Comment