What The National Pamphleteers Don't Report:
obama Fired Military
Officers Because He 'Fears a Coup'
by "Sorcha Faal,"
reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com
November 21, 2012
According to (shadowy anonymous
blogger) Sorcha Faal the Russian military's
GRU foreign intelligence unit
presented a report to Kremlin leadership late last month that said Obama removed
one of the United States Navy’s most powerful admirals from his command (in the
wake of Benghazi 9/11) specifically because he fears a military coup is being planned against
him.
On 9/11/2012, that
officer -Rear Admiral Charles M.
Gaouette, commander of Carrier Strike Group
Three in the Middle East- apparently felt obligated to come to the aid
of besieged US defenses at the Benghazi consulate, violating an utterly
bewildering White House command he probably had a hard time believing was even
being made. Gaouette was said to be
attempting to help AFRICOM commander General Carter Ham, also purged by Obama
for violating of an obstinate White House insistence to 'stand down'.
Ham considered
himself bound-by-duty to take action, but the story goes that his
second-in-command -a likely Obammunist- promptly stepped-right-up and informed
him he'd just been 'relieved of his command', effective immediately- General
Ham was then physically apprehended/arrested.
Subsequently -and
despite Navy claims that he was NOT
'replaced' due to Benghazi- Admiral Gaouette was otherwise inexplicably
removed as Carrier Strike Group commander on October 27th... [...]
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2012/11/russian-military-intelligence-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
Teen Sentenced to 10 Years of Church Attendance
by Billy Halloway,
theblaze.com
November 16, 2012
An Oklahoma teenager In Muskogee, Oklahoma, who pleaded guilty in the tragic death of another teen has been given an interesting sentence: 10 years of church attendance in exchange for not heading to prison. The defendant, Tyler Alred, 17, is not fighting a judge’s mandate, as his lawyer deems the decision both fair and appropriate.
“My client goes to church every Sunday,” attorney Donn Baker told Tulsa World. “That isn’t going to be a problem for him. We certainly want the probation for him.” [....]
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/judge-sentences-teen-to-10-years-of-church-attendance-after-dui-manslaughter-conviction/
Keep Both Eyes On Your Retirement Funds
by Bob Livingston,
Personal Liberty Digest
November 21, 2012
Americans hold about $17.9 trillion in retirement assets. These are found in the form of 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts and pension funds.
That money is not your own. If it were, you would be able to access it without penalty. But that is not the case. Taxes and onerous fees are tacked on if you take the money when you need it as opposed to when your “benevolent” government masters believe you should have it.
Congress established retirement programs like IRAs and 401(k)s in order to prop up the stock markets for the big banksters and make themselves look good. Americans have been fooled into equating a rising stock market with improving economic conditions. But when it’s propped up under false pretenses (by driving money into the market that would ordinarily be used elsewhere or through massive infusions of fiat currency via bailouts), it is like fool’s gold.
And now some are eyeing those funds as a big [....]
http://personalliberty.com/2012/11/21/keep-both-eyes-on-your-retirement-funds-as-fiscal-cliff-nears/
Democracy And Majority Rule
by Dr Walter E, Williams,
creators.com
November 21, 2012
President Barack Obama narrowly defeated Gov. Mitt Romney in the popular vote 51 percent to 48 percent. In the all-important Electoral College, the difference was larger, with Obama winning 303 electoral votes and Romney 206. Let's not think so much about the election's outcome but instead ask: What's so good about democracy and majority rule?
How many decisions in our day-to-day lives would we like to be made through majority rule or the democratic process? How about the decision to watch a football game or "Law and Order"? What about whether to purchase a Chevrolet Volt or a Toyota Prius? Would you like the decision of whether to have turkey or ham for Thanksgiving dinner to be made through the democratic process? Were such decisions made in the political arena, most of us would deem it tyranny.
Democracy and majority rule give an aura of legitimacy and decency to acts that would otherwise be deemed tyranny. Most people would agree that having our decisions on what television shows to watch, what kind of car we'll purchase and what we'll eat for Thanksgiving dinner made through the democratic process is tyranny. Why isn't it also tyranny for the political process to determine decisions such as how much should be put aside out of our paycheck for retirement; whether we purchase health insurance or not; what type of light bulbs we use; or whether we purchase 32- or 16-ounce soda containers?
The founders of our nation held a deep abhorrence for [....]
http://www.creators.com/opinion/walter-williams/democracy-and-majority-rule-12-11-21.html
Killing The Goose
by Dr Thomas Sowell,
creators.com
November 20, 2012
Killing the goose that lays the golden egg is one of those old fairy tales for children which has a heavy message that a lot of adults should listen to. The labor unions which have driven the makers of Twinkies into bankruptcy, potentially destroying 18,500 jobs, could have learned a lot from that old children's fairy tale.
Many people think of labor unions as organizations to benefit workers, and think of employers who are opposed to unions as just people who don't want to pay their employees more money. But some employers have made it a point to pay their employees more than the union wages, just to keep them from joining a union.
Why would they do that, if it is [....]
http://www.creators.com/opinion/thomas-sowell/killing-the-goose.html
Washington Post Admits that the Obama Recovery Has Been Terrible
by Daniel J. Mitchell,
townhall.com
November 20, 2012
I agree that Obama inherited a crappy economy, and I think it is silly to assert that he bears any responsibility for the severity of the 2007-2009 recession.
But it is very fair to hold him responsible for what’s happened since the recession ended. I’ve cited data from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve on both employment and gross domestic product to show that Obama has presided over the weakest recovery in the post-World War II period. And I think it is fair to blame Obama for the economy’s anemic performance during that time, largely because his agenda of faux stimulus and Obamacare exacerbated the statist policies of Bush. In other words, he promised “hope” and “change,” but delivered more of the same.
Well, now that the election is over, even the Washington Post is willing to admit that Obama’s economic performance is dismal. Here’s a remarkable chart showing that growth is far below the [....]
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2012/11/20/now_that_the_election_is_over_the_washington_post_admits_that_the_obama_recovery_has_been_terrible/page/full/
The EPA vs. State Economies
by Marlo Lewis,
nationalreview.com
November 19, 2012
On Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency rejected petitions from the governors of Georgia, Texas, Arkansas, Delaware, Maryland, New Mexico, and North Carolina to suspend the biofuel-blending requirements established by the federal renewable fuel standard (RFS) program. This program requires refiners to blend increasing quantities of biofuel — mostly corn ethanol — into the nation’s motor-fuel supply. The 2012 target is to blend 13.2 billion gallons of biofuel into our gasoline, a quantity that ratchets up to 13.8 billion gallons in 2013. This year, about 4.7 billion bushels, or 40 percent of the nation’s corn crop, will be consumed by ethanol manufacturing. The governors contend that the RFS program, combined with the worst drought in 50 years, pushed corn prices to record highs, harming their states’ poultry, beef, pork, and dairy producers, who use corn as animal feed. The Clean Air Act authorizes [,,,]
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/333604/epa-vs-state-economies-marlo-lewis
Mason Jar Goblets
by Doug Fuson,
dougswood.blogspot.com
November 21, 2012
I turned two Mason Jar Goblets for the People's Choice table at the Olbrich
Show in October. One attendee liked them and bought them at the show. She also
asked me to make some more for her, so I did, and they went out in today's mail.
The new four are quite like the originals, though not exact copies (I worked
from general dimensions and a photo).
I didn't have any more of the dark brown
laminated birch that I'd turned the original bases from, so I turned the bases
from some walnut limbs I had on my shelf. The finish is an undercoat of Watco
Walnut Danish Oil, topped with several coats of high gloss Waterlox. The turned
bases on the larger goblets are 4" high, 2 15/16"D at the bottom and 1"D at the
top; on the smaller, 3 ¼"H, 2 7/16"D at the bottom, and ¾"D at the top.
[More photos at Doug's site]
{Blogger Note: From the photos I've seen, Mr Fuson is an artisan; a true master craftsman!! I'll even bet he'd make you something, for a price of course.}
http://dougswood.blogspot.com/2012/11/mason-jar-goblets.html
So What If Taxing Rich Hurts the Economy?
by Larry Elder,
townhall.com
November 22, 2012
Consider this headline from a Reuters article in The Huffington Post: "Raising Taxes on Rich Won't Hurt Economic Growth, CBO Says."
But the first paragraph refutes the headline: "Allowing income tax rates to rise for wealthy Americans would not hurt U.S. economic growth much (emphasis added) in 2013 ..." The CBO did not say, as the headline suggests, that raising taxes on the rich has no negative economic effect. In fact, the CBO actually said that extending the Bush-era rates for all would increase economic growth by 1.5 percent. If, however, the Bush era rates expired for the rich -- but were retained for everybody else -- economic growth would still increase, but by 1.25 percent.
In other words, raising taxes would result in less economic activity, not more. Herein lies the key to understanding why the left wants higher taxes for "the rich." To the rich-should-pay-more crowd, the question of whether raising taxes hurts economic growth is less important than the issue of "fairness."
Then-presidential candidate Barack Obama, in 2008, was asked why he insisted on pushing a capital gains tax increase given that, historically, higher capital gains rates meant less revenue: [....]
http://townhall.com/columnists/larryelder/2012/11/22/so_what_if_taxing_rich_hurts_the_economy/page/full/
Petraeus Scandal Diverts Focus From Benghazi Cover-Up
by Diana West,
townhall.com
November 22, 2012
I think I know what David Petraeus is thankful for this week.
Even though it appears the former CIA director lied to the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 14, and may have lied again to the same committee on Nov. 16, he is starting to slip out of the inner ring of Benghazi cover-up suspects. We are losing sight of his official role in the deception as the media lens ossifies over a tawdry love triangle. For this, he must be thankful. Maybe to ensure the good fortune continues, Petraeus has hired Bob Barnett, the $975-per-hour Washington superlawyer to officials with issues and/or big book deals, to manage what reports call Petraeus' "transition to civilian life."
Here, for the record, is what the media and politicians are letting slip away with him.
After Petraeus appeared before the House Intelligence Committee on Sept. 14 to brief members behind closed doors on the Benghazi attack of Sept. 11, the ranking Democrat on the committee, Maryland Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, gave ABC an account of the briefing.
"In the Benghazi area," Ruppersberger said, "in the beginning we feel that it was spontaneous -- the protest -- because it went on for two or three hours, which is very relevant, because if it was something that was planned, they could have come and attacked right away. At this point, it looks as if [....]
http://townhall.com/columnists/dianawest/2012/11/22/petraeus_scandal_diverts_focus_from_benghazi_coverup/page/full/
Rand Paul Continues Indefinite Detention Fight
by Sam Rolley,
Personal Liberty Digest
November 19, 2012
Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) filibustered a vote on the Defense Authorization Act in an attempt to get Congress to vote on his amendment affirming the Constitution’s 6th Amendment to ensure Americans are protected against indefinite military detention. The Paul Amendment would ensure that any American citizen being held by the military is granted the right of trial by a jury of peers and the right to confront witnesses against him.
“A citizen of the United States who is captured or arrested in the United States and detained by the Armed Forces of the United States pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40) shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense,”
the amendment states. The Senator [....]
http://personalliberty.com/2012/11/19/rand-paul-continues-indefinite-detention-fight/
Until Next Sunday....
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment