This'n'That; March Twenty-Ninth #2; More Mindless Blather

The "Clown Prince's" Most Recent Opportunity
    To be sure, "Clown Prince" owe-bama has yet to miss a blather opportunity!  The one last night was nothing more than owe-bama's feeble attempt to garner even more 'glory' he doesn't deserve and hasn't earned.  Here are a few quotes I picked out of his presentation and my opinion of the background for the comment or actual unfolding of the events or decisions:
 "Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges.  But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act.  That’s what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks."
What--exactly--are 'our interests and values?'  I contend that this was an "action-for-oil," but not our oil!!  As illustrated by a map published by STRATFOR GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE (http://www.stratfor.com/ or http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/) the only interests in Libya are oil; the only oil interests in libya are European!!  We have no interests in Libyan oil, or in Libyan 'anything!!'
"We knew that if we wanted -- if we waited one more day, Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.  It was not in our national interest to let that happen."
Why--exactly--are we finally concerned with 'reverberating massacres?'  What about the massacres in Darfur; in North Korea; in Syria; in The Ivory Coast?  It's not in owe-bama's best interests to save and protect any peoples not invested in by owe-bama's "a$$hole buddies."
"To lend some perspective on how rapidly this military and diplomatic response came together, when people were being brutalized in Bosnia in the 1990s, it took the international community more than a year to intervene with air power to protect civilians. It took us 31 days."

That '31 days' thingie...?  Just another of owe-bama's bold-faced lies!!  It's taken the United States roughly TWENTY-TWO YEARS, FOUR MONTHS... and still Khaddafi has not been brought to justice for promoting and funding the 'Lockerbie Bombing,' which killed a total of 270 persons; 259 (189 Americans) on the plane; 11 on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland. 
"I refused to let that happen. And so nine days ago, after consulting the bipartisan leadership of Congress, I authorized military action to stop the killing and enforce U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973. "

Why are the National Pamphleteers publishing articles speaking to the whines of members of both parties; of both houses of Congress?  Sounds like another of owe-bama's bold-faced lies!
"I made it clear that Qaddafi had lost the confidence of his people and the legitimacy to lead, and I said that he needed to step down from power."
Will the current NATO coalition stand by the American citizens when a majority of them make the same claims about their ruler: barack insane owe-bama?!?  They better rearm and re-aim, soon!!
"The task that I assigned our forces -– to protect the Libyan people from immediate danger, and to establish a no-fly zone -– carries with it a U.N. mandate and international support."
"Clown Prince" owe-bama is--at best--a 'figurehead' ruler.  Most times he's doing the bidding of George Soros; this time he's doing the bidding of the 'three-ladies-in-a-room:'  Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power!!  They made the decisions involving Libya, primarily as a dry-run to an invasion of Israel.  Ms Power (wife of Cass Sunstein-reputed to be "the most dangerous man in America") is both a strong advocate of the 'Responsibility-to-Protect,' and she despises Israel, Zionism and all they stand for!!
     In conclusion, this action will not bode well for owe-bama.  Those who actually can think will remember this during the on-going "Campaign of Fluff-Redux" and into the '12 elections.  Unless there's a quick and severe change of heart among General Holder's "....my people....," owe-bama won't have nearly the support he enjoyed among the owe-bamacRATs and the 'KoolAid drinkers!'  Keep an 'eye-out' for that "Responsibility-to-Protect" phrase; you'll see it again and again!  Not much more than a very loosely defined buzz-phrase to be used by the socialist-marxist-fascists.  It'll cover any instance where they feel it necessary to invade and dismantle any group (nations, political units, Tea Party-esque organizations) to promote their one-world government philosophy.
Til Nex'Time....