Posts
War ON Libya; Toward One-World Government?
Many only know "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist"--while lying through his teeth--declared war on Libyian dictator Muammar Gaddafi by marshalling the American forces for what would become "Operation Odyssey Dawn." What most don't know are the details of Samantha Power's involvement as well as her complicity with George Soros as One World government advocates. First, we must delve into Ms Power's past; how did she get where she is?!?
Samantha Power first came to prominence as a humanitarian hawk, favoring both United Nations and United States' intervention in humanitarian crises i.e., Bosnia, Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia and now Libya. Ms Power began to see war as an instrument to achieve her radical, liberal values. Ms Power has written that the United States must be prepared to risk the lives of it's soldiers to stop the threat of genocide. Ms Power condemns Western 'appeasement' of dictators, believing "the battle to stop genocide has been repeatedly lost in the realm of domestic politics."
Somewhere-along-the-line, Ms Power married Cass Sunstein, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist's" favorite socio-fascist. She committed a huge gaffe--on a 'plug' biden level--while working on "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist's" presidential campaign. Ms Power called Hillary Clinton 'a monster:'
Ms Power, with Hillary Clinton and UN Ambassador Susan Rice have been 'the voice (and, most probably the intelligence, the balls) behind "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist's" Libya action. This gives way to my thought that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narccissist" has not had an 'original thought' since grade school. The guy got mediocre grades in high school and the various colleges he attended; his books so far, seem to have been ghost-written, probably by his favorite communist radical: Bill Ayers. "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist" cast more 'present' votes in Congress than any other, which is the best coarse of action when coherent thought evaded him. Oh!! And this quote from "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist" before he was "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist" (The "Clown Prince" wrote this in the Bill Ayers' book "
"We f**ked up in Ohio," she (Power) said. "In Ohio, they're obsessed and Hillary's going to town on it, because they know Ohio's the only place they can win. She's a monster, too----that is off the record--she is stooping to anything."
[Sounds to me like Bill Ayers had 'a co-ghost' in writing this book!! But, I digress.]
"Samantha Power deserves special mention for her extraordinary generosity; despite being in the middle of writing her own book, she combed over each chapter as if it were hers, providing me with a steady flow of useful comments even as she cheered me up whenever my spirits or energy were flagging."
Samantha Power--in conjunction with former Nazi worker George Soros--has been a prime mover in pushing forward the military doctrine of "The Responsibility to Protect (R2P)" or "The Responsibility to Act." The original concept of 'R2P' can be laid directly at the feet of former (then current) U.N. Secretary General Koffi Annan when he asked:
"When does the international community intervene for the sake of protecting populations?"
"If human intervention is, indeed, an unacceptable assault on sovereignty, how should we respond to a Rwanda, a Srebrenica--to gross and systematic violations of human rights that affect every precept of our common humanity?"
**States [countries] have the primary responsibility to protect their populations....
**....committment of the international community to provide assistance to states in the aforementioned endeavor....
***....responsibility of the international community to take decisive and immediate action to prevent, halt mass atrocities....
"....The nature of sovereignty itself has thus changed: legitimate governments are defined not only by their control of a territory and a population but also how they exercise that control. If they fail in that obligation, the international community has the responsibility to protect those citizens. [....]"
Hell, for the past several decades; for the last several administrations, many federal responsibilities have quietly been handed over to the United Nations. One example readily comes to mind:
In January, 1996 "Slick-Willie" Clinton quietly signed an executive order which assigned administration and control over many of the United States national parks, national historical sites, as well as bio-sphere reserve sites to the United Nations. As of July, 1999 UNESCO controlled 20 World Heritage sites and 47 Bio-sphere Reserves (both in the U.S.), totaling over 51 MILLION acres (larger than the State of Colorado). As of the same date, the United Nations controlled 896 such sites, worldwide!!
Til Nex'time....
http://www.thenation.com/article/159570/samantha-power-goes-war
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/06/samantha-power-resigns-ov_n_90339.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Power
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/39Hillary-Clinton39s-a-monster39-Obama.3854371.jp
http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2011/April14/1411.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_to_protect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_to_protect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Commission_on_Intervention_and_State_Sovereignty
http://www.answers.com/topic/non-governmental-organization
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/08/was-the-libyan-intervention-really-an-intervention/244175/
http://www.epa.gov/fedreg/eo/eo12986.htm
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070420142830AADGh32
http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA253.html In America, how big a leap would be necessary to expand control over a 'World Heritage Site' into the state that contains it?!? There are National Parks, Bio-sphere sites, wildlife refuges, et al, in practically every state in the country. With foreign forces used as enforcement vehicles, the United Nations could easily take over the entire country. With an agreeable individual in power, the U.S. might just 'stand-down' and allow it to happen. These are all points-to-ponder when determining the qualifications for the nation's chief executive; far much more than the limited consideration given the current ruler during his campaign for 'selection-for-election!!' My contention here is that with ever-growing influence from the likes of Samantha Power, George Soros, Susan Rice as well as "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist" these examples of 'R2P' as well as upcoming possibilities, will be directed with the intention of more-and-more control exercised over the offending 'states.' George Soros--in a planetary sense--as well as Samantha Power to a lesser extent, have expressed their great desires in having a one-world government; having a one-world economy!! "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, The Narcissist" does absolutely nothing to dissuade the public from the attitude that he's in lock-step with the aforementioned miscreants.In an article in The Atlantic Monthly, Anne-Marie Slaughter writes:In December of the following year, said commission released it's report, entitled "The Responsibility to Protect." The next major advancement to 'R2P' came in January, 2009 when (then) Secretary General Ban Ki-moon released "Implementing the Responsibility to Protect" which outlines the doctrine's three principles:In 2000 the Canadian federal government created their 'International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS).' This group was founded by Gareth Evans and Mohamed Sahnoun and consisted of members of the U.N. General Assembly. It's purpose was to arrive at an answer to the full--unedited--Annan question:
No comments:
Post a Comment