This'n'That; May Tenth #2; RepublicRATic Senate?

owe-bama; Soros; Bilderbergers' Policies....
    ....are more distasteful that previously thought!  Several recent events make for enlightening conversation:
    Mr Keith Judd--the federal felon--thoroughly 'spanked' the "Clown Prince" in the recent--inconsequential--owe-bamacRATic primary in West Virginia.  There was no reason to even turn out, so this 'protest vote' is even more telling.  Another discouraging fact: both Senator Joe Manchin and Governor Earl Ray Tomblin refused to admit which federal felon they voted for.  Who doesn't like to brag about voting for the incumbent ruler, no matter who it is?!?
    It's highly likely the Bilderberg Group dispatched George Soros to France in the wake of Francios Hollande defeating Nicholas Sarkozy for the french presidency.  Also likely, the Bilderbergers are desparate to discourage M. Hollande from instituting even more socialist policies than has been the norm under M. Sarkozy.  If said socialist policies are instituted, the concensus is they will be a mirror of the future result of current and future owe-bama (read: Bilderberg) policies for the United States.  The possible end result of further french socialist policies will be a further slipping into a completely NEGATIVE economy, again a mirror of what's to come with the U.S. economy and jobs markets.  This will open the American voters' eyes, highly detrimental to the owe-bama re-immaculation efforts!!
    Recent primary campaigns and votes indicates the "Tea Party" Movement is alive-and-well, contrary to the blatherings of owe-bamacRATic pollsters, campaign managers, campaign mouth-pieces, et al.  The "Tea Party" Movement--rather than dying as the owe-bamacRATics would have you believe--has re-doubled efforts to force the Congress back toward the representative republic we all know and love!!  While we've already discussed the "Clown Prince's" 'spanking' in West Virginia, consider these poll results:
Montana (US) Senate seat--Dennis Rehberg (r, 53%); incumbent Jon Tester (d, 43%);
Nevada (US) Senate seat--incumbent Dean Heller (r, 51%); Shelley Berkley (d, 40%);
Missouri (US) Senate seat--Sarah Steelman (r, 49%); incumbent Claire McCaskill (d, 40%); 
Ohio (US) Senate seat--incumbent Sharrod Brown (d, 44%); Josh Mandel (r, 41%), with 12% of likely voters UNDECIDED;
Massachusetts (US) Senate seat--incumbent Scott Brown (r, 45%); Elizabeth Warren (d, 45%), with 8% of likely voters UNDECIDED;
Florida (US) Senate seat--Connie Mack (r, 43%); incumbent Bill Nelson (d, 36%);
*Nebraska (US) Senate seat--Jon Bruning (r, 55%); Bob Kerrey (d, 33%);
**Wisconsin (US) Senate seat--Tommy Thompson (r, 50%); Tammy Baldwin (d, 36%).
*Incumbent Senator Ben Nelson is quitting before the voters 'hand him his-ass-on-a-silver-platter' in the wake of owe-bamaKare's "Cornhusker Kick-Back" scandal (voters don't forget crooks)!! 
**Incumbent Senator Herb Kohl has likewise, seen the "anti-owe-bama writing-on-the-wall" and has opted for retirement over resounding defeat!! 
    The current make up of the United States Senate tenuously favors the owe-bamacratics:  51 owe-bamacRATics + 2 'less-than' independents; 47 republicRATics.  The aforementioned senate contests--if current sentiment holds--will surely transform the Senate into one more closely representing the direction the American voter prefers.
Til Nex'Time....
http://search.babylon.com/?q=retired+congressmen+benefits+and+pay&affID=109935&tt=050412_30b&babsrc=SP_ss&mntrId=a8aee2b6000000000000001c2674eb83
http://dusanotes.hubpages.com/hub/How-Much-Do-Congressmen-Make
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2012/05/05/2012-battle-for-the-senate-could-gop-be-poised-to-retake-senate-montana-senate-rehberg-r-53-tester-d-43-nevada-senate-heller-r-51-berkley-d-40-missouri-senate-steelman-r-49/#more-36097
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2012/03/15/us-senate-races-2012-gop-poised-to-take-back-the-senate-up-in-fl-wi-mt-ne-and-ma/
http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/pressure-attorneys-general-forced-nelson-request-removal-cornhusker-kickback
http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2012/02/alinsky-disciple-obama-does-master-proud/238191
http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/Senate/Louisiana/Mary_Landrieu/Scandals/$300_Million_Dollar_payout_in_exchange_for_supporting_health_care_reform/
http://hobnobblog.com/congress-by-the-numbers/

This'n'That; October Twenty-Fourth #1; What Now?!?

What Was Accomplished; Where To, Now?!?
    We--the American Taxpayers--were led into the Libyan civil war by "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist."  He was a little bit pissed when French President Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron garnered more press than he; garnered more adulation of the Libyan commoner than he!   They were 'first in' with their military assets; "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" was forced to go to the United Nations and beg to 'play-with-the-big-kids.'  Early on, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" lied to us--the American Taxpayers--about there being no 'boots-on-the-ground' in Libya.  I submit that there's rarely a kerfuffle--worldwide--that America's premier 'toy breakers and opposition neutralizers' are not involved in--overtly or covertly!!  America's special forces--members of USSOCOM--are highly trained as--among many other things--forward-air-controllers; calling in air strikes on the opposition's civilian and military assets.
    Now the Libyan civil war has ended with the ouster and death of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.  The new quasi-dictator--Mustafa Abdul-Jalil--is calling for the incoming regime to adhere to tenants of Sharia Law.  While Colonel Gaddafi's Libya certainly was not an 'equality government,' this reversion to Sharia Law is several backward steps toward The Stone Age.  In all fairness, the damage will be determined by which version Abdul-Jalil and his camp followers will insist adherence to:

A.)  Secular muslim states-religious interference in state-affairs, law and politics is prohibited (Kazakhstan, Turkey).
B.)  Blended sources-the ultimate authority is their constitution and the rule of law, with legal systems strongly influenced by Sharia Law (Pakistan, Afganistan, Egypt).
C.)  Classic Sharia Law-no constitution; no legislatures.  Laws based on Sharia as interpreted by religious scholars.  Rulers--dictators--have limited authority to change laws (Iran, Saudi Arabia).

Til Nex'Time....    Therein lies the kerfuffle!!  Which boot to put on the neck of the citizenry?!?  "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" Islamic background dictates that he stay out of discussions on the form of government; the rule of law.  Now--just in time for the campaign season--"Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" can claim that but for he, himself.... the Libyan people would still be living under that tyrant, Colonel Gaddafi!!

This'n'That; November 2nd[obama;Palin;Bail-out;Charity]

Palin Scammed Alaska Governor Sarah Palin spent six minutes speaking with someone she thought was French President Nicolas Sarkozy. The two discussed politics, the perils of hunting with Vice President Dick Cheney and Sarkozy's "beautiful wife." The call was made by a well-known Montreal comedy duo Parc-Antoine Audette and Sebastien Trudel. The two are notorious for prank calls to celebrities and heads-of-state. Bailout Stuff During the week ended Oct 31, the Treasury Department released $125 Billion to nine banks. ***Those nine banks [ticker symbol][how many $]: Bank of America.........................[BAC].....................................................$25Billion Citigroup....................................[C]..........................................................$25Billion JP Morgan Chase.......................[JPM].....................................................$25Billion Wells Fargo................................[WFC]....................................................$25Billion The Goldman Sachs Group........[GS]........................................................$10Billion Morgan Stanley.........................[MS]........................................................$10Billion Bank of New York.....................[BK]............................................................$2Billion State Street Bank......................[SST]...........................................................$2Billion This cash will buy taxpayers preferred shares in those banks and increase the banks' liquidity. The Bailout Promise: If the taxpayers provided the funds, the banks would resume lending, thawing a frozen credit market. The devil is in the details: The Treasury Department agreed to the loans with fairly weak strings attached. There was no actual requirement to lend the money provided by the feds and there are some weak restrictions on executive compensation. So far, the money is going to pay either bank dividends, satisfy old debt or to shore up the banks' bottom lines. NONE OF THESE will address the problem of frozen credit markets. Using nearly half of the funds to pay dividends to stockholders instead of fueling the credit markets, leaves the taxpayers on the "short end of the stick." Some [primarily] non-financial sector companies are lining up for Bailout funds. The automakers are claiming that they should be included due to their lending subsidiaries. They are arguing that because they have these financial subsidiaries, they are banks and thus should be included in the bailout. Bailing out ANYONE BUT bona fide banking institutions will create a dangerous precedent. The government will then be put in the position of picking-and-choosing what they consider winning versus losing industries/companies. As noted in the Weekly Wastebasket, an on-line publication of Taxpayers for Common Sense [ http://www.taxpayer.net/ ], Wall Street needs to get off it's collective "dead ass and on it's dying feet [I paraphrase]" and get back to work.... the business of the American economy. Is His Word Reliable; Will He Take Care Of Us? Well,IS o-bomb-a's word reliable? Take for instance, his pledge of tax reduction for those making "less than [insert number here...]. This pie-in-the-sky promise initially started at [those incomes less than] $300,000. It was then changed in the following digression: ***o-bomb-a [his-own-majestic-self] reduced it to $200,000. ***The Dolt [that foreign affairs genius] reduced it to $150,000. ***NM Governor Bill Richardson reduced it to $120,000. I'll bet in reality, the reductions don't stop until they reach the $40-50,000 range. o-bomb-a would replicate that "Slick Willie" moment: " I worked as hard as I could on this tax problem, as hard as I ever have........" Early in "Slick's" first term, he not only raised taxes after making campaign promises not to, he MADE THE INCREASE RETROACTIVE, back to January First!!!!! The first president in history to do so!!!! Well, WILL o-bomb-a take care of us? With all this "spread-the-wealth-around" talk, will he really take care of us? If that's really the case; if all these campaign promises are to be believed, then why hasn't he undertaken the same caring and compassion with his own family? ***o-bomb-a has a brother George, living in a hut in Kenya. George has an annual income of just $12; that's three-cents a day!!! If o-bomb-a, who's promised to take care of us, practically cradle-to-grave, tossed George a fifty-dollar bill, George's annual income would increase 400 percent!!!!! ***o-bomb-a's aunt was recently found living in a Boston slum. This aunt, Zeituni Onyango, is in the U.S. illegally-having been denied asylum from her home country of Kenya. In 2007, Money Magazine estimated the o-bomb-a net worth at $1.3 MILLION. The o-bomb-a 2007 Federal tax return indicated a $4.3 MILLION income. Seems like o-bomb-a could "get off soma that greed" and take care of his own family first. What would it take...... maybe twenty grand a year??? That would be about .00047% of the family's 2007 income [$4,238,826]!!! These folks, the o-bomb-as as a family, are a "really giving, charitable" couple. Check this crap out..... Year.....Income.....Donations...percentage 2000.... 240,505..... 2,350 .........00.9% 2001 ....275,123 .......1,470 .........00.5% 2002 ...260,824....... 1,050........ 00.4% 2003 ...238,327....... 3,400 .........01.4% 2004 ...207,642 .......2,500 .........01.2% 2005 ...1.6Million ...77,315 .........04.7% 2006....983,826......60,307........06.1% [Reference: www.msnbc.com/id/23796726/ ] So............ for those seven years they earned a whopping $3,806,247. As charitable donations, they claimed a Federal deduction for the paltry sum of $148,392 [equalling just 00.04% of income !!!] Don't his compassion jis makeya feel warm and fuzzy all over ?!?!?! Til Nex'time......