"The Fix" Is In But Who's Involved?!?
With Speaker John Boehner about to 'bone' the American taxpayer with his $800 Billion in tax increases; with Governor Sarah Palin apologizing for speaking the truth as she saw it, how deep does "The Fix" actually run?!? The signatories to the proposal letter from Boehner to "Clown Prince" obama combined with the "Tea Party" republicRATics that were 'fired' by Boehner indicates--at least to me--that the House republicRATic leadership intends to aid in that body's 'destruction from within!'
With a jaundiced eye, John Boehner summarily fired four representatives on various House Committees for not voting "the party-line!!"
Does Mr Boehner realize that Adolf Hitler DID NOT WIN the last b-i-g war; that "Clown Prince" obama has not yet assumed the 'Hitler Mantle?!?'
Justin Amash (r, Mi-3; budget cmte); Tim Huelskamp (r, Ks-1; budget, ag cmtes); Walter Jones (r, NC-3; financial svc cmte), David Schweikert (r, Az-6; financial svc cmte) are the aforementioned firees, discharged for not voting with the House leadership on various pieces of legislation. To do so would have violated their mandates from the home-district voters.
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin walked-back her comments relative to her thoughts on the Boehner Cave-In. Last Saturday (12/02), Mrs Palin reminded all watchers, listeners that the House of Representatives 'hold the purse-strings,' and that capitulating to "Clown Prince" obama would reinforce her opinion--with which I agree--that the House leadership is a collection of wusses! I personally don't think that Mrs Palin should have apologized for her 'wuss' and 'wobbly' comments about the House Leadership.
Rep John Boehner (r, Ohio-8), assumed the House Speakership in January, 2011, from an even worse 'tax-and-spender,' Nancy PORKlosi. I--for one--think that given the electorate's preferences during the "Tea Party" victories in the 2010, a far more conservative republicRAT could have been elected to the Speakership. Currently, Mr Boehner is assuming that "Clown Prince" obama has the upper hand, when--in fact--the Speaker is in 'the driver's seat' by constitutionally 'holding the purse-strings!' This "fiscal-cliff" thingie is nothing more than Congressionally generated 'political theatre.' The fiscal ineptitude has been going on--by both major parties--for some several decades; be it intentionally running an annual deficit or--like "Slick-Willie's" administration--creative accounting in hiding the self-inflicted damage to the federal budget, resulting in several years' kicking-the-can-down-the-road! I say "let both parties and the current regime go over the cliff-and good riddance!" Except the trip over the edge won't actually get rid of anyone; they'll still be here "phucking-up-like-Hogan's Goat!!"
Your comments?!?
Til Nex'Time....
Showing posts with label Amash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amash. Show all posts
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
This'n'That; May Thirtieth #1; How Conservative?!?
Is The "Tea Party" Congressional Class Of 2010 Really Conservative?!?
Remember when the conservative taxpayers put their collective foot down concerning RINO incumbents in 2010? This action put 87 new republicRATic House members to work after a thorough vetting by individual "Tea Party" Movement groups, nationwide. Those "Tea Party" conservatives are up for re-election--as is the entire House of Representatives--this fall.
In my district--NY-25--Ann Marie Buerkle will be challenged by Dan Maffei, the miscreant she defeated in 2010. Mr Maffei made it painfully obvious during his tenure he had learned absolutely nothing in his Master of Public Policy course work at Harvard. He was little more than a mouthpiece and yes-man for the nancy PORKlosi House. So, given this information, I was really curious how conservative Ms Buerkle actually is or isn't.
The 'Club For Growth' folks did a highly informative study on just that subject, studying all the "Tea Party"-supported Congressmen. In the study, Ms Buerkle scored 92% while three scored 100% (Justin Amash, Mi-3; Tim Huelskamp, Ks-1; Raul Labrador, Id-1). The two worst in scoring--tied at a dismal 42%!--are Bob Dold, Il-10; Patrick Meehan, Pa-7!! Another surprise for me was the scores for those NY-vetted freshmen aside from the aforementioned Ms Buerkle's 92%:
Chris Gibson (NY-20), 44%;
Michael Grimm (NY-13), 46%;
Richard Hanna, (NY-24), 44%;
Nan Hayworth, (NY-19), 56%;
Tom Reed, (NY-29), 68%. Excepting Ann Marie Buerkle, the New York contingent of miscreants certainly can't match their campaign rhetoric to their post-election voting records. Every dam' one of them must be resoundingly 'thumped' by a TRUE "Tea Party" candidate in the upcoming fall elections!! If one can not support "Tea Party-esque" legislation at least nine-times out of ten, he-or-she doesn't belong in the federal government. Remember:
Nothing will change without a smaller government;
Nothing will change without adherence to the United States Constitution,
Nothing will change without reduced, conservative spending.
So in the aggregate, nothing will change without further "Tea Party" vetted candidates to replace said miscreants as well as a clear majority of the remaining owe-bamacRATic socio-fascists.
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freshman-republicans-switch-from-tea-to-kool-aid/
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/freshmanvotestudy/?state=
Remember when the conservative taxpayers put their collective foot down concerning RINO incumbents in 2010? This action put 87 new republicRATic House members to work after a thorough vetting by individual "Tea Party" Movement groups, nationwide. Those "Tea Party" conservatives are up for re-election--as is the entire House of Representatives--this fall.
In my district--NY-25--Ann Marie Buerkle will be challenged by Dan Maffei, the miscreant she defeated in 2010. Mr Maffei made it painfully obvious during his tenure he had learned absolutely nothing in his Master of Public Policy course work at Harvard. He was little more than a mouthpiece and yes-man for the nancy PORKlosi House. So, given this information, I was really curious how conservative Ms Buerkle actually is or isn't.
The 'Club For Growth' folks did a highly informative study on just that subject, studying all the "Tea Party"-supported Congressmen. In the study, Ms Buerkle scored 92% while three scored 100% (Justin Amash, Mi-3; Tim Huelskamp, Ks-1; Raul Labrador, Id-1). The two worst in scoring--tied at a dismal 42%!--are Bob Dold, Il-10; Patrick Meehan, Pa-7!! Another surprise for me was the scores for those NY-vetted freshmen aside from the aforementioned Ms Buerkle's 92%:
Chris Gibson (NY-20), 44%;
Michael Grimm (NY-13), 46%;
Richard Hanna, (NY-24), 44%;
Nan Hayworth, (NY-19), 56%;
Tom Reed, (NY-29), 68%. Excepting Ann Marie Buerkle, the New York contingent of miscreants certainly can't match their campaign rhetoric to their post-election voting records. Every dam' one of them must be resoundingly 'thumped' by a TRUE "Tea Party" candidate in the upcoming fall elections!! If one can not support "Tea Party-esque" legislation at least nine-times out of ten, he-or-she doesn't belong in the federal government. Remember:
Nothing will change without a smaller government;
Nothing will change without adherence to the United States Constitution,
Nothing will change without reduced, conservative spending.
So in the aggregate, nothing will change without further "Tea Party" vetted candidates to replace said miscreants as well as a clear majority of the remaining owe-bamacRATic socio-fascists.
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/freshman-republicans-switch-from-tea-to-kool-aid/
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/freshmanvotestudy/?state=


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)