Sequester SHOULD Stop Presidential Travel
Hey... Barry! May I call you Barry? Would you prefer "Clown Prince?" OK, ok!! "Your Ineptness," it shall be! Well, be that as it may, You and I gotta problem! First of all, you "showed your ass" in this sequestration 'head-fake' bullshit; you aught not have tried that. Those young republicRATics--like Marco Rubio; like Ted Cruz; like Rand Paul--are developing balls at a hugely-fast rate!!
See, when you--we checked with Bob Woodward, and you did--demanded huge cuts in the Department of Defense's budget as punishment for allowing sequestration to be put into law, you--thankfully, for the taxpayers--cut your travel budget!! Yup, even for those quasi-official, diplomatic campaign stops you're famous for!! As quoted here:
He [the current "Clown Prince"] has a business expense budget of $50,000 a year, a travel expense budget of
$100,000 a year, and an entertainment budget of $19,000 a year.
The expense account is generally used for meetings that aren't covered by
other government departments and for other things that would generally be called
"business expenses." Whenever the president travels for state business
(diplomacy), the State Department and Defense Department pay for all of it. When
he or his family travels for pleasure (vacation), the security and some travel
costs are paid for by government (Defense Department and Department of
Transportation). When the president travels for political purposes, his
political party picks up much of the (non-security) tab.at least half of your travel expenses are covered by the Defense Department 'sleight-of-hand' accounting-wise! Your annual travel budget barely covers bringing the Air Farce One engines up to take-off speeds, ONCE!! ($180,000 per-hour versus $100,000 per-year) See "Bare..." while you're flittin' willy-nilly, around the country-side, we taxpayers are hoping that the aforementioned 'young-buck' senators will stop the plane in some God-forsaken, third-world rathole, and padlock the doors!! That'd keep your fuzzy, half-caucasian ass out'ta the way 'til you can find a ride 'home!!'
Comments, anyone??
Til Nex'Time....
Reference "Lie-Barry:"
http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/special/questions.htm
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/chapter-2
Showing posts with label Paul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
This'n'That; March Twelfth #2; RINOs
Is It Any Wonder....?
We've recently been forced to watch the republicRATics' "old-guard" senators react to the Senator Rand Paul filibuster. They--in the persona of both McCain and Grahamnesty--publically chastised him and his like for deviating from the Marxist ways of said Senate oldsters. In that vein, the same ol'garters guarders refused to support Ted Cruz in his most recent--successful--Senate campaign; instead supporting Texas' former Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst whom Mr Cruz CRUSHED in a primary run-off!
I'd think this campaign and resultant election indicates that the younger citizens; younger voters--at least in Texas--are wising up to the liberal left's destructive Marxist blather and actions. They need but to check Senator Cruz's resume to see this man is a dedicated conservative, with the peoples' rights foremost in his mind!! Senators Rubio, Paul and Cruz seem to be the new breed of conservative the republicRATic ol'garters guarders are afraid of. We need to continue to elect fine young men to promote and augment their conservative thoughts and actions!!
Comments, anyone?
Til Nex'Time....
We've recently been forced to watch the republicRATics' "old-guard" senators react to the Senator Rand Paul filibuster. They--in the persona of both McCain and Grahamnesty--publically chastised him and his like for deviating from the Marxist ways of said Senate oldsters. In that vein, the same ol'
I'd think this campaign and resultant election indicates that the younger citizens; younger voters--at least in Texas--are wising up to the liberal left's destructive Marxist blather and actions. They need but to check Senator Cruz's resume to see this man is a dedicated conservative, with the peoples' rights foremost in his mind!! Senators Rubio, Paul and Cruz seem to be the new breed of conservative the republicRATic ol'
Comments, anyone?
Til Nex'Time....
Labels:
conservatives,
David Dewhurst,
Graham,
McCain,
Paul,
Rubio,
Ted Cruz
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
This'n'That; January Eleventh #2; Oops!!?!!
owe-bamacRAT 'Mouthpiece' Blabbed!
We--of the conservative, the constitutionalist persuasion--have long known the owe-bamacRATics' choice of an opponent is Willard 'Mitt' Romney. That knowledge was confirmed after Saturday evening's GOP debate when Soros hack Donna Brazile 'stepped on her tongue' while discussing said debate with John Karl and George "Steffie" Stephanopoulos. Some 'Brazile-isms:'
"Mitt Romney won tonight [Saturday's debate] because no one touched him--and for democrats, you know what? It was good news for us."
"....we believe that the weakest candidate is the candidate that the republicans are not attackin', and that's Mitt Romney."
What Ms Brazile was scripted to say is that the owe-bamacRATic machine; the Soros machine, are afraid of meeting Romney in the general election or it's preceeding presidential debates!!
Karl and "Steffie" were scripted to confirm Ms Brazile's--Soros' authored--remarks.
There's history to confirm what the conservatives believe:

A. Herman Cain: The bimbos coming "out-of-the-woodwork" against him. Where are they now?!? Soros paid 'em off and they went merrily on their way.

B. Rick Santorum: is routinely vilified by the national pamphleteers for his stances concerning homosexuality, gay rights, same-sex marriage, LGBT issues; his success in Iowa (a statistical tie with Romney) is ignored.

C. Newt Gingrich: is 'all about Newt,' rather than pointing out the owe-bama failings, as he should; "all the money" Newt earned by advising Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (like that even comes close to the fraudulant, illegal campaign donations by 'DooDad Pro' among many others, to the "Clown Prince's" 2008 effort!!); Newt's many divorces, and the circumstances thereof.

D. Ron Paul: his followers are 'loonies;' he's a foreign affairs wierdo; he's locked on destroying the Federal Reserve Bank system; he's had very little success in having his authored legislation passed.

E. Rick Perry: he's a 'debate catastrophe' waiting to happen; he's radical on border security; he can't win the nomination.

Each one of the un-Mitts is attacked by the Soros financed, mainstream media while Mitt himself, is left alone to veer toward a centrist stance; just where Soros and "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" want him!! All these examples more-than-prove Mitt is the White House's choice as the GOP nominee!

Til Nex'Time....
Santorum: http://www.gopmall.com/candidates/president/rick-santorum/
All others: http://www.fredstates.com/
We--of the conservative, the constitutionalist persuasion--have long known the owe-bamacRATics' choice of an opponent is Willard 'Mitt' Romney. That knowledge was confirmed after Saturday evening's GOP debate when Soros hack Donna Brazile 'stepped on her tongue' while discussing said debate with John Karl and George "Steffie" Stephanopoulos. Some 'Brazile-isms:'
"Mitt Romney won tonight [Saturday's debate] because no one touched him--and for democrats, you know what? It was good news for us."
"....we believe that the weakest candidate is the candidate that the republicans are not attackin', and that's Mitt Romney."
What Ms Brazile was scripted to say is that the owe-bamacRATic machine; the Soros machine, are afraid of meeting Romney in the general election or it's preceeding presidential debates!!
Karl and "Steffie" were scripted to confirm Ms Brazile's--Soros' authored--remarks.
There's history to confirm what the conservatives believe:

A. Herman Cain: The bimbos coming "out-of-the-woodwork" against him. Where are they now?!? Soros paid 'em off and they went merrily on their way.

B. Rick Santorum: is routinely vilified by the national pamphleteers for his stances concerning homosexuality, gay rights, same-sex marriage, LGBT issues; his success in Iowa (a statistical tie with Romney) is ignored.

C. Newt Gingrich: is 'all about Newt,' rather than pointing out the owe-bama failings, as he should; "all the money" Newt earned by advising Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (like that even comes close to the fraudulant, illegal campaign donations by 'DooDad Pro' among many others, to the "Clown Prince's" 2008 effort!!); Newt's many divorces, and the circumstances thereof.

D. Ron Paul: his followers are 'loonies;' he's a foreign affairs wierdo; he's locked on destroying the Federal Reserve Bank system; he's had very little success in having his authored legislation passed.

E. Rick Perry: he's a 'debate catastrophe' waiting to happen; he's radical on border security; he can't win the nomination.

Each one of the un-Mitts is attacked by the Soros financed, mainstream media while Mitt himself, is left alone to veer toward a centrist stance; just where Soros and "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" want him!! All these examples more-than-prove Mitt is the White House's choice as the GOP nominee!

Til Nex'Time....
Santorum: http://www.gopmall.com/candidates/president/rick-santorum/
All others: http://www.fredstates.com/
Labels:
bumper stickers,
Cain,
Donna Brazile,
Doodad Pro,
Gingrich,
John Karl,
Paul,
Perry,
romney,
Santorum,
Stephanopoulos
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
This'n'That; November Second #1; An Alternative?!?
I May Have Been Wrong!!
Yesterday (November First http://justincase505.blogspot.com/2011/11/thisnthat-november-first-1-more.html), I blogged about "The Soros Plumbers" quite possibly having sabotaged the Herman Cain campaign with "Watergate-esque" activities. I quite possibly may have been wrong (imagine that! Someone admitting a possible error!). I could have been Mr Cain's own party; Mr Cain's opponents for the GOP nomination.
Think about this: Willard "Mitt" Romney--for the most part--has been leading in the polls since forever; this time 'round, the GOP nomination seemed--early on--to be Mr Romney's to lose. Newt Gingrich has been rising in the polls of late. He seems to be considered "a Washington insider," a negative in anybody's book! Texas Governor Rick Perry--after his declaration--shot up meteoritically in the polls, to run a close second to Mr Romney. Mr Rick Santorum seems to have traction on a local basis but not much of a following, nationally. Former Governor John Huntsman--at least to me--seems to be untrustworthy, having been "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" Ambassador to China; potentially a 'stealth' member of the owe-bama inner circle. Mr Ron Paul is largely seen as a bit of a radical, albiet with a potent message and a passionate delivery; probably not electable. Ms Michele Bachmann--after being a top contender--seems to have had 'the bottom fall out of her campaign;' out of her debate credentials.
While I'm accusing no-one, I merely suggest that anyone of these contenders may have been the sabeteur in Mr Cain'ssexual harassment inappropriate actions kerfuffle. Each has good reason to see Mr Cain fail in his quest for the nomination.
The public; the Herman Cain supporters seem not to be buying the assertions that Mr Cain made any inappropriate advances toward co-workers when he ran the National Restaurant Association. On his morning talkshow, Mark Davis (WBAP-820AM; DFW; 8:30-11:00AM, central time; http://www.wbap.com/article.asp?id=746707 ) had several callers and emailers who said they'd already donated from $50 to $150 to the Herman Cain Campaign (as have I!)!! Mark Block--Mr Cain's Chief-of-Staff--reported that in a single, 24-hour period (last Sunday evening to Monday evening), Mr Cain's campaign raised upwards of $400,000; a clear vote-of-confidence!!
Til Nex'Time....
Yesterday (November First http://justincase505.blogspot.com/2011/11/thisnthat-november-first-1-more.html), I blogged about "The Soros Plumbers" quite possibly having sabotaged the Herman Cain campaign with "Watergate-esque" activities. I quite possibly may have been wrong (imagine that! Someone admitting a possible error!). I could have been Mr Cain's own party; Mr Cain's opponents for the GOP nomination.
Think about this: Willard "Mitt" Romney--for the most part--has been leading in the polls since forever; this time 'round, the GOP nomination seemed--early on--to be Mr Romney's to lose. Newt Gingrich has been rising in the polls of late. He seems to be considered "a Washington insider," a negative in anybody's book! Texas Governor Rick Perry--after his declaration--shot up meteoritically in the polls, to run a close second to Mr Romney. Mr Rick Santorum seems to have traction on a local basis but not much of a following, nationally. Former Governor John Huntsman--at least to me--seems to be untrustworthy, having been "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" Ambassador to China; potentially a 'stealth' member of the owe-bama inner circle. Mr Ron Paul is largely seen as a bit of a radical, albiet with a potent message and a passionate delivery; probably not electable. Ms Michele Bachmann--after being a top contender--seems to have had 'the bottom fall out of her campaign;' out of her debate credentials.
While I'm accusing no-one, I merely suggest that anyone of these contenders may have been the sabeteur in Mr Cain's
The public; the Herman Cain supporters seem not to be buying the assertions that Mr Cain made any inappropriate advances toward co-workers when he ran the National Restaurant Association. On his morning talkshow, Mark Davis (WBAP-820AM; DFW; 8:30-11:00AM, central time; http://www.wbap.com/article.asp?id=746707 ) had several callers and emailers who said they'd already donated from $50 to $150 to the Herman Cain Campaign (as have I!)!! Mark Block--Mr Cain's Chief-of-Staff--reported that in a single, 24-hour period (last Sunday evening to Monday evening), Mr Cain's campaign raised upwards of $400,000; a clear vote-of-confidence!!
Til Nex'Time....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

