Saturday, April 7, 2012
This'n'That; April Seventh #1; Media--All Racists?!?
I found an article published by Reuters, authored by Barbara Liston and Martinne Geller, concerning Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law, as well as the ColorOfChange organization promoting their own brand of racism. I found it in yahoo.com news. Yahoo published the column, so--by extension--Yahoo is supporting and promoting the advancing racist perceptions involving the Trayvon Martin tragedy. Here's what the authors had to say in their efforts to promote said racism:
"Trayvon Martin, 17, was killed on February 26 in Sanford, Florida, by George Zimmerman, 28, a white and hispanic neighborhood watch volunteer who has claimed he acted in self defense and has not been charged with a crime."
I'm sure that--if confronted--both Liston and Geller would make the claim that they are not racists and do not promote racism in their reporting. If that be the case, any articles they write on national politics might describe our exalted ruler as:
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our negro and white exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our white and negro exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our cauca-negro exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our Kenyan-caucasian exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our negroid-caucasian exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, our half-negroid; half caucasian, with a smattering of other humanoid sub-races exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, the jug-eared, light-skinned negro exalted ruler, or
"Clown Prince" owe-bama, the jug-eared, brown-skinned caucasian exalted ruler.
Depending on your point of view, each 'Clown Prince' description is equally racist--or non-racist--as the "white and hispanic" description applied to Mister Zimmerman. Why is said "Clown Prince" not accorded the same descriptive deference--or lack, thereof--as Mister Zimmerman?!? I'm sure the "Clown Prince" would appreciate the inclusiveness!!
Now--if I might--I'd like to address the 'Stand Your Ground' law in general as well as specifically; I believe it DOES NOT APPLY in the Martin tragedy:
Every state has some 'self-defense' law on the books. The most common is that the victim must--while 'rolling-over-and-playing-dead--flee the attack, the scene if at all possible; a 'Duty To Retreat.' Another common law is the 'Castile Doctrine' wherein one has the right to use reasonable force--in some cases, deadly force--to be secure in one's home. 'Stand Your Ground' gives the victim much more latitude in defending himself, rather than continuing to be victimized by the miscreant. In Florida, once 'self-defense' is invoked, the onus is with the prosecution to disprove the claim. The Florida law is not as uncommon as I originally thought; 23 other states have some version of 'Stand Your Ground.' The most surprising inclusions are Washington (State) and Oregon, two bastions of liberal socio-fascism!! The liberals usually err on the side of the miscreant rather than the victim!!
Florida's 'Stand Your Ground' law does not apply in the Martin tragedy, and here's why:
After ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, et al, admitted to--and corrected--their fu*king with evidentiary video tape, it's clear that Mister Zimmerman had been beaten about the head and face; Mister Zimmerman had suffered blunt-force trauma to the back of the head just as he claimed; blood clearly visible from both injuries. Further verification by the medical attention Mister Zimmerman recieved from on-scene EMTs.
When one is on one's back--on the ground/sidewalk--being beaten by a miscreant attacker, one can not exercise the 'duty-to-retreat.' Mister Zimmerman was unable to retreat even if he wanted to; Mr Martin was on top, beatin' the snot out of him! Mister Zimmerman had little choice but to use deadly force! Sadly, had both men made different--better--choices, this tragedy could have been reduced to a shouting match; reduced to a pushing-and-shoving match.
Til Nex'Time....


Monday, October 27, 2008
This'n'That; October 28th[Lcl History;obama;Definitions]
Definitions Necessary In The Current Political Climate
Socialism:
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organizaton in which the means of producing and distributing goods owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.
3. A political and economic theory or system of social organization based on collective or state ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange. Like capitalism, it takes many and diverse forms.
Facism
1. An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
2. Extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice. The term fascism was first used describing the totalitarian right-wing nationalist regime of Benito Mussolini in Italy [1922-1943]. The Nazi Regime in Germany was also Fascist. Fascism tends to include a belief in the supremacy of one national or ethnic group, a contempt for democracy, an insistence on obedience to a powerful leader and a strong demogogic approach.
3. The five main components of the facist ideology:
a] Extreme [superior] nationalism.
b] An assertation of national decline.
c] National decline is often linked to a diminution of racial purity of the nation.
d] The blame for national decline is based on a conspiracy of other nations/races seen as competing for dominance.
e] In the struggle for dominance, both capitalism and liberal democracy are seen as divisive devices to ragment the nation and subordinate it in the world order.
4. The philosophy of government that stresses the primacy and glory of the state, unquestioning obedience to its leader, subordination of the individual will to the state's authority and harsh suppression of dissent.
Communism
1. A theorectical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
2. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
3. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat.
Til Nex'time.....

