This'n'That; September Nineteenth #4; Krauthammer

The Romney "47%" Comments
    I found this "Krauthammer-ism" while surfing about:
"Look at a featured speaker at Democrat convention, Sandra Fluke. Here's a woman who is from an elite law school, is going to make $160,000 as a starting salary in the private sector. What is her great demand? Why was she the big star? Demanding that ordinary Americans average income $50,000 pay her contraceptives. That is personification of the idea of entitlement, of victimization. That is entire idea of ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country can do for you. This is exactly what Romney is talking about."
-- Charles Krauthammer on "Special Report with Bret Baier."
Only 48 days left....
Til Nex'Time....

This'n'That; September Eleventh #2; Now We Know..

..Why She's Usually Behind A Desk, Podium!
    I have to thank 'Bungalow Bill' for a September Tenth entry on his blog.  The photo below now reveals why Sandra Fluke is usually behind a desk or podium:

More to the point, 'Bill' was referencing an article inwhich Congressman Joe Walsh was 'suggesting' that Ms Fucke... er Fluke.... get a job.  Some of the Walsh verbiage prompted by the white campaign button on the lady below:

So, thanks 'Bill!'
Til Nex'Time....

This'n'That; March Eighth #2; U of R Kerfuffle

Do NOT Engage In Critical Thought!
    Rather than pontificate on the goings-on at the University of Rochester in the last several days, I've included appropriate URLs at the bottom of this post.  Suffice it to say that one Professor Steven Landsburg is in deep shit with the university's hierarchy.  Professor Landsburg authored a blog post critical of Sandra Fluke's PRESENTATION--or rather demand--for free contraception at a hastily Nancy PORKlosi called press conference; the professor did not defend Rush Limbaugh's comments.
    Dr Joel Seligman, President of the University of Rochester, took exception to Professor Landsburg's comments, after misconstruing them.  Check out the various URLs for the--more-or-less--complete details.
Til Nex'Time....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Landsburg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Seligman
http://www.thebigquestions.com/2012/03/02/rush-to-judgment/
http://www.thebigquestions.com/2012/03/05/contraceptive-sponges/
http://www.thebigquestions.com/2012/03/07/a-contra-conception/
http://www.thebigquestions.com/2012/03/08/aftermath/
http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/576277/u-of-r-professor-under-fire-by-university-president/
http://www.13wham.com/mostpopular/story/Local-Professor-Backs-Controversial-Limbaugh/2mnZkNH2g0Kvi8WXecW6Rw.cspx

This'n'That; March Fifth #2; Just One....

....Of owe-bama's Master Plans!
    During the January 7th--New Hampshire--GOP Debates, ABC teleprompter-reader, George Stephanopoulos doggedly went after Mitt Romney on the issue of contraception rights.  George's 'attack' came out of the clear-blue-sky, but he wouldn't let it go; wouldn't let Romney use his waffle-ness to sidestep the issue.
    Prior to the aforementioned, on August 1, 2011, Kathleen Sebelius--owe-bama's chief hatchetman on owe-bamakare issues--enumerated the Regime's position on women's health issues:  After August 1, 2012--per owe-bamaKare--women must be afforded FREE birth control, FREE 'morning after' pill, FREE abortions-on-demand,  as well as FREE preventative services with regard to women's issues and women's reproductive rights.
    On January 20, the "Clown Prince's" hatchetman--Sebelius--issued an edict exempting parishes and houses-of-worship from the above requirements but held that other catholic institutions--hospitals and universities--would be subjected to the "Clown's" proclamation!
    On February 10, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" appeared to backtrack on the 'catholic contraception' issue--but then again--not so much!  While this "Control Freak"--aka "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist"--still insists that a vast majority of catholic hierarchy violate their morals and religious teachings to advocate for free contraception and baby-killings, he has moved the onus to the insurance providers. 
What-ta-hell difference does this make?!? 
It's still contraception;
it's still baby-killing;
it's still all about the federal control of every aspect of American life!!
    On February 23, a thirty-something Sandra Fluke testified before a hastily-called Nancy PORKlosi-sponsored 'hearing on Women's Health' inwhich she alluded that she screws so much that a thousand-bucks a year barely covers her birth control!!  She also--using the "Clown Prince's" show of illuding to other 'poor, mistreated souls'--spoke of other 'mistreated' fellow students to buttress her position.  This spurred a heated discussion on conservative talk-radio--most notibly Rush Limbaugh--who mistakenly ended up apologizing for his statements.  Ms Fluke apparently chose Georgetown Law, knowing full well that it is a Jesuit institution with a 233 year history of catholic morals and princples.
   Did all these instances happen randomly?!?
I think not!!  This is little more than a Soros-engineered deflection away from the far more important 'issues-of-the-day,' the national economy, the lack of a jobs market, et al!  Initially--with the Stephanopoulos debate questioning--it was a grasping for THE issue that would 'stick-to-the-wall,' and evolved from there into a full-blown contraception crisis!
    But, is it a CONTRACEPTION crisis?!?  Again, I think not!!  Contraception just happened to be the first topic that 'stuck-to-the-wall!!  This is nothing more than the constant 'grasping-at-straws' that Soros and owe-bama are forced into, to avoid campaigning on the latter's complete lack of presidential accomplishment.
'Splain to me again why YOU elected this Arschloch?!?
Til Nex'Time....