This'n'That; April Third #2; The Constitution....?!?

Whiney-Assed Liar!
    I'd like to suggest--for the umpteenth time--that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" review the document he's sworn to support and defend--and presumably abide by--The United States Constitution.  No doubt, the next time he reads it, WILL BE THE FIRST TIME!
    After criticizing the Supreme Court as an "unelected group of people;" the "Clown Prince" goes on with blatant lies in an attempt to sway the court's decision relative to owe-bamaKare. 
1.  "....the extraordinary step of overturning a law...."  As a law school 'constitutional law' grad-assistant (NOT a professor as the national pamphleteer 'corpse' would have you believe) the "Clown Prince" should realize the Supreme Court is well within it's authority--and responsibility--to strike down the law, should they decide!!
2.  The legislation was passed by a "strong majority of a democratically elected Congress"  This--of course--is ANOTHER blatant lie; owe-bamaKare passed by smallest permissible majority possible.
3.  "....I'm confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the law...."  As will all other "Princely" actions, owe-bamaKare can not stand on it's merits-IT HAS NONE!  This is just one more example of the national pamphleteer 'corpse' blatantly supporting the "Clown Prince" in his attempt to mold the Supreme Court decision in his favor.
4.  "....its constitutional...."  Nothing more than the "Clown Prince" trying to advance his dictatorial-democracy by controlling yet another INDEPENDENT branch of the federal government.
5.  "....seniors are paying less for prescription drugs under this law...." ANOTHER blatant lie!  Medicare Part D has been in existence since January 1, 2006 (Part D is a part of the 'Medicare Modernization Act of 2003)!!  In 2003, the "Clown Prince" had yet to become the "Clown Prince;" he was a member of the Illinois State Senate.  In 2006, again before the "Clown Prince" became the "Clown Prince;" he was a 'voting-present,' JUNIOR member of the U.S. Senate. 
6.  "....unprecedented...." (the "Clown Prince's" opinion of a Supreme Court 'strike-down' of owe-bamaKare)  ANOTHER blantant lie!  The United States Supreme Court has been striking down unconstitutional laws since 1803 (Marbury vs. Madison).
    In a sidebar comment, "Clown Prince ZERObama, the Narcissist" reminded his adoring subjects that he truly deserves his exalted position:
"My entire career is a testiment to American Exceptionalism."
'Splain to me again why YOU elected this Arschloch!?!
Til Nex'Time....
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/tygrrrr-express/2012/apr/2/president-obama-demonizes-supreme-court-possibly-d/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicare_Part_D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

This'n'That; March Seventh #2; Constitution.... What Constitution?!?

owe-bama Dictatorship Justified By Holder
    "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" choice of Eric Holder as the country's top law enforcement officer again illustrates their combined incompetence!!  With cleaver verbage--during his March 5th blather opportunity at Northwestern University Law School-- the 'General' attempted to justify the notion that the "Clown Prince"--at his whim--can ignore the Congress and federal law when it suits the regime's socio-fascist principles.
    The War Powers Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-148; 50 U.S.C. 1541-1548) requires that a president consult with Congress "in every possible instance" before deploying U.S. forces.  Here it would be germaine to recall that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" informed the Congress--back in January of this year--HE would decide which laws are constitutional and which laws HE could choose to ignore:
"I have informed Congress that I will not construe these provisions as preventing me from fulfilling my constitutional responsibility to recommend to the Congress's [sic] consideration such measures as I shall judge as necessary and expedient."
How considerate of our dictatorial supreme ruler!!
    To that end, 'General' Holder has explained that 'supreme-ruler, owe-bama' determined that the constitution rights of an American citizen--outside the U.S. borders--don't count-for-shit!!  Particularly when said citizen is involved with an entity warring against the United States!  Gee!!  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember reading in the Constitution that it's up to the sitting American ruler to determine my--or any citizen's--rights, inside or outside the country!!  Did the Founding Fathers write the Constitution as an item-by-item, choose-or-not-choose, document?!?  I think NOT!!
'Splain to me again why YOU elected this Arschloch!?!
Til Nex'Time....