Is 'TFI, CPo' REALLY Deranged?!?
"Clown Prince" obama (CPo) has finally gone beyond ineptitude, beyond incompetence to a state of mental derangement, a trip into functional madness!! I intend to contact my invisible senator, Kirsten Gillibrand to see if the Palace psychiatrist has been involved in CPo's mental-health care. Never-the-less, TFI, CPo (That Fuckin' Idiotic, "Clown Prince" obama) has been isolated in his madness, to wit:
a couple'a days ago TFI, CPo trotted 'Big Sis,' Janet Napolitano out to announce the ludicrus plan to release imprisoned illegals, pretending that's it's more than a publicity stunt ahead of the miniscule sequestration budget cuts. TFI, CPo wrongly believes that the 'Big Sis' announcement isolates him from this treasonous, impeachable act; sadly though, the "Clown Prince" hasn't thought this through.
Firstly, Hillary "Rob'em" Clinton is no longer available--as a member of the regime--to 'take responsibility' for his stupidity. TFI, CPo might consider asking her replacement, John Forbes-Heinz-Kerry to step in and announce his 'Hillaryesque' intentions!!
Secondly, by definition said "Clown Prince" is responsible for any and all actions, statements, declarations, stupid thoughts ANYONE in his administration undertakes!! Hence, he and other cohorts are subject to impeachment proceedings although the various obamunists will keep him from legal action.
The general populus--including the low-information voters--should be outraged! About a month ago, TFI, CPo issued twenty-three (?) Executive Orders, some of which instructed ICE and Border Patrol agents to detain and incarcerate only those illegals convicted of serious--felony--crimes. Hence, 'Big Sis' will--and can only--release the murderers, the rapists, the human traffickers, the traffickers of monumental amounts of drugs, possibly others in various stages of ill repute!!
Comments, anyone?
Til Nex'Time....
Showing posts with label Gillibrand. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gillibrand. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Friday, February 22, 2013
This'n'That; February Twenty-Second #1; Frauds, ALL!
We All Knew It; Now There's Proof!!
While Mr Simson's article in the examiner concentrates on "Clown Prince" obama's fraudulent 2012 presidential election, it appears the previous one was 'purchased' as well. Although it'll do no good, I intend to forward the referenced articles to my federal representatives. The lack of any good to be done is that I'm "represented" by:
Senator "Chuckie-Cheese" Schumer, the "Putz of Park Avenue;"
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, "The Invisible Senator;, and
Rep Dorothy "Geeze-Louise" McIntosh Rodham Slaughter!!
....all obamunists to-the-core!!!
Comments anyone?
Til Nex'Time....
Reference "Lie-Barry:"
http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-obama-campaign-caught-major-vote-fraud-scheme
http://democracy.verafirma.com/about.htm
http://www.getcatapult.com/
http://techpresident.com/topics/online-organizing
http://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/massive-voter-fraud-in-nc/
http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-registers-over-583-democrat-votes-over-the-age-of-112?cid=PROD-redesign-right-next
http://www.nccivitas.org/2011/sboe-flip-flops-on-absentee-ballot-request/
http://www.nccivitas.org/2012/civitas-president-calls-out-elections-chief-on-lie/
While Mr Simson's article in the examiner concentrates on "Clown Prince" obama's fraudulent 2012 presidential election, it appears the previous one was 'purchased' as well. Although it'll do no good, I intend to forward the referenced articles to my federal representatives. The lack of any good to be done is that I'm "represented" by:
Senator "Chuckie-Cheese" Schumer, the "Putz of Park Avenue;"
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, "The Invisible Senator;, and
Rep Dorothy "Geeze-Louise" McIntosh Rodham Slaughter!!
....all obamunists to-the-core!!!
Comments anyone?
Til Nex'Time....
Reference "Lie-Barry:"
http://www.examiner.com/article/breaking-obama-campaign-caught-major-vote-fraud-scheme
http://democracy.verafirma.com/about.htm
http://www.getcatapult.com/
http://techpresident.com/topics/online-organizing
http://silencedogood2010.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/massive-voter-fraud-in-nc/
http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-registers-over-583-democrat-votes-over-the-age-of-112?cid=PROD-redesign-right-next
http://www.nccivitas.org/2011/sboe-flip-flops-on-absentee-ballot-request/
http://www.nccivitas.org/2012/civitas-president-calls-out-elections-chief-on-lie/


Labels:
Clown Prince,
election fraud,
Gillibrand,
North Carolina,
obama,
obamunist,
schumer,
slaughter,
voter fraud
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
This'n'That; February Twelfth #1; Since 'The Tour!'
I've Questioned obama's Political Stance Since Apology Tour
Remember the infamous "2009 Worldwide Apology Tour" when our very-own "Clown Prince" obama bowed-and-scraped to every third-world muslim terrorist-dictator?!? That's when I began to wonder about said "Clown's" political proclivities. Seems I'm not the only one (this, from the reaganiterepublican):
Do keep in mind that many in the Arab world are convinced obama is a Shiite Muslim himself--they note that he went after (Sunni) bin Laden aggressively and only supported Arab Spring revolutions against Sunni Muslims and Arab secularists in Libya, Egypt, etc--yet refused to lift a finger against a Shiite-allied (Iran/Hezbollah) Assad regime in Syria nor teetering Tehran itself in 2009--then handed Iraq right over to them.
Said proclivities are being confirmed by the nominations of John Heinz-Kerry--who served in Viet Nam--as Sec'y of State; of John Brennan as CIA Director and Chuckie Hagel as Sec'y of Defense.
Heinz-Kerry will replace "Rob'em" Clinton asAmerica's "Clown Prince" obama's international 'yes-person.'
John Brennan A former U.S. Marine/FBI Agent confirmed Brennan's conversion: “Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia.” Like-wise, this clown should never be confirmed for anything 'OBAMA!'
Lil' Chuckie Hagel is the craftsman of a deal to support the muslim terrorists over the pro-freedom movement. This clown should never be confirmed!! We have enough muslim-terrorists and supporters in barackingham Palace!
Today might be the day; right now might be the time, to call your senators and 'splain all this to them. If they're like mine (Chuckie-Cheese Schumer-The Putz of Park Avenue and Kirsten--the invisible senator--Gillibrand) any criticism will fall on deaf ears, but I like to call once-a-week or so-just to let 'em know I still exist!!
Your comments:
Til Nex'Time....
Reference "Lie-Barry:"
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/139806
Video link:
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.ktuu.com/sns-ap-us-hagel-20130211,0,4060374.story
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.trentovision.tv/
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/28/chuck-hagel-the-darling-of-tehran/
Brennan--as a gunrunner--video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2L-mLud0CY&feature=player_embedded
Brennan-muslim conversion video:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/video-former-fbi-agent-confirms-cia-nominee-john-brennan-a-convert-to-islam/
Remember the infamous "2009 Worldwide Apology Tour" when our very-own "Clown Prince" obama bowed-and-scraped to every third-world muslim terrorist-dictator?!? That's when I began to wonder about said "Clown's" political proclivities. Seems I'm not the only one (this, from the reaganiterepublican):
Circumstantial evidence of
Obama's Shia-sympathies is indeed considerable...
and I imagine he'd be proud of how Iran is provoking Israel, rather than making
deals with them like (Sunni) Mubarak did. NOW these two nutty, pro-Muslim
nominees to run our nation's defense and intelligence complex...?
Said proclivities are being confirmed by the nominations of John Heinz-Kerry--who served in Viet Nam--as Sec'y of State; of John Brennan as CIA Director and Chuckie Hagel as Sec'y of Defense.
Heinz-Kerry will replace "Rob'em" Clinton as
John Brennan A former U.S. Marine/FBI Agent confirmed Brennan's conversion: “Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia.” Like-wise, this clown should never be confirmed for anything 'OBAMA!'
Lil' Chuckie Hagel is the craftsman of a deal to support the muslim terrorists over the pro-freedom movement. This clown should never be confirmed!! We have enough muslim-terrorists and supporters in barackingham Palace!
Today might be the day; right now might be the time, to call your senators and 'splain all this to them. If they're like mine (Chuckie-Cheese Schumer-The Putz of Park Avenue and Kirsten--the invisible senator--Gillibrand) any criticism will fall on deaf ears, but I like to call once-a-week or so-just to let 'em know I still exist!!
Your comments:
Til Nex'Time....
Reference "Lie-Barry:"
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/139806
Video link:
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.ktuu.com/sns-ap-us-hagel-20130211,0,4060374.story
http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-islamic-fifth-column-nominees.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReaganiteRepublicanResistance+%28Reaganite+Republican%29
http://www.trentovision.tv/
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/28/chuck-hagel-the-darling-of-tehran/
Brennan--as a gunrunner--video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2L-mLud0CY&feature=player_embedded
Brennan-muslim conversion video:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/video-former-fbi-agent-confirms-cia-nominee-john-brennan-a-convert-to-islam/


Tuesday, June 19, 2012
This'n'That; June Nineteenth #2; Farm Bill
'pinky' reid Again "The Obstructionist!"
With the U.S. Senate in deliberations on the next 'farm bill--S. 3240--(with the delusionary title: Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012)' harry 'pinky' reid will play obstructionist in deciding which amendments will come to the floor for debate. The amendment with the most importance to conservatives, the "Tea Party" Movement, is Senator Rand Paul's which would change the administration of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funds to block grants to the states.
Senator Paul's amendment--S. Amdt 2177--would require the individual states to administer their own SNAP grants. Each state would establish it's own eligibility requirements as well as monitoring and enforcement procedures. This amendment--which failed, 65-33--would have reduced the welfareRAT income source by $280 Billion "over-ten-years" by freezing funding at the current level of $45 Billion a year.
Although my senators (C. Ellis Schumer and Kirstin "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand) are communists from New York, 'The Welfare State,' I intend to inform them of my plans to insure they find retirement or unemployment!! Hopefully, you'll do the same if your senator(s) voted against this amendment!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2226
[List and voting results] http://governmentgonewild.org/foodstamphallofshame?utm_source=GGW&utm_campaign=e94b2b971d-Food_Stamp_HOF6_17_2012&utm_medium=email
http://www.ag.senate.gov/issues/farm-bill
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/13/sen-rand-paul-were-giving-food-stamps-to-millionaires/
http://www.agriculturelaw.com/newsarchive.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food,_Conservation,_and_Energy_Act_of_2008
http://www.npr.org/2012/06/13/154862017/why-the-farm-bills-provisions-will-matter-to-you
With the U.S. Senate in deliberations on the next 'farm bill--S. 3240--(with the delusionary title: Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012)' harry 'pinky' reid will play obstructionist in deciding which amendments will come to the floor for debate. The amendment with the most importance to conservatives, the "Tea Party" Movement, is Senator Rand Paul's which would change the administration of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funds to block grants to the states.
Senator Paul's amendment--S. Amdt 2177--would require the individual states to administer their own SNAP grants. Each state would establish it's own eligibility requirements as well as monitoring and enforcement procedures. This amendment--which failed, 65-33--would have reduced the welfareRAT income source by $280 Billion "over-ten-years" by freezing funding at the current level of $45 Billion a year.
Although my senators (C. Ellis Schumer and Kirstin "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand) are communists from New York, 'The Welfare State,' I intend to inform them of my plans to insure they find retirement or unemployment!! Hopefully, you'll do the same if your senator(s) voted against this amendment!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2226
[List and voting results] http://governmentgonewild.org/foodstamphallofshame?utm_source=GGW&utm_campaign=e94b2b971d-Food_Stamp_HOF6_17_2012&utm_medium=email
http://www.ag.senate.gov/issues/farm-bill
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/13/sen-rand-paul-were-giving-food-stamps-to-millionaires/
http://www.agriculturelaw.com/newsarchive.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food,_Conservation,_and_Energy_Act_of_2008
http://www.npr.org/2012/06/13/154862017/why-the-farm-bills-provisions-will-matter-to-you


Labels:
farm bill,
Gillibrand,
Rand Paul,
reid,
s.3240,
s.amdt 2177,
schumer
Thursday, December 29, 2011
This'n'That; December Twenty-Nineth #1; The "47-Percenters"
The Congressional Millionaires
The 112th Congress consists of The Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate consists of 51 owe-bamacRATics plus 2 semi-owe-bamacRATics; 47 republicRATics. The House consists of 242 republicRATics, 193 owe-bamacRATics.
There are some surprising facts about the millionaires we've elected to Congress.
Like: 53% of the Senate are owe-bamacRATics--but--84% of those (45) owe-bamacRATics are millionaires.
Like: 55.8% of the House of Representatives are republicRATics--and yet--only 56% of those (137) republicRATics are millionaires.
Like: Rep Darrell Issa of California is worth between $195-$700 million.
Like: Sen John Heinz-Kerry is only worth between $181-$281 million.
Like: "pinky" reid's crooked land deals in Nevada should'a given him a net worth greater than $6.8-$10.3 million.
Like: New York's Senatorial contingent (C. Ellis Schumer-"The Putz of Park Avenue" and Kirsten "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand) ONLY have a combined net worth of $1.1-$2.5 million. "The Putz of Park Avenue" very well may not be as adept at financial/economic 'decisions' as we thought; the "Invisible Senator" is suffering for it, right along with him!!
Like: Barney Frank's net worth of between $1.9-$4.5 million. Frank's Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide Financial payoffs combined with his Washington area brothel(s), it should be far higher. Maybe he's just "packin' the fudge" regarding his required financial reporting!!
This URL (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArZJzmIoVZE0dDNzc1h0bHpjVk50Wkh6MlVwRkxRcnc#gid=0) will allow you to check the financial goings-on of your representative and senators. Enjoy the read!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/money/personal-finance/47-congress-are-millionaires-just-1-rest-us
The 112th Congress consists of The Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate consists of 51 owe-bamacRATics plus 2 semi-owe-bamacRATics; 47 republicRATics. The House consists of 242 republicRATics, 193 owe-bamacRATics.
There are some surprising facts about the millionaires we've elected to Congress.
Like: 53% of the Senate are owe-bamacRATics--but--84% of those (45) owe-bamacRATics are millionaires.
Like: 55.8% of the House of Representatives are republicRATics--and yet--only 56% of those (137) republicRATics are millionaires.
Like: Rep Darrell Issa of California is worth between $195-$700 million.
Like: Sen John Heinz-Kerry is only worth between $181-$281 million.
Like: "pinky" reid's crooked land deals in Nevada should'a given him a net worth greater than $6.8-$10.3 million.
Like: New York's Senatorial contingent (C. Ellis Schumer-"The Putz of Park Avenue" and Kirsten "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand) ONLY have a combined net worth of $1.1-$2.5 million. "The Putz of Park Avenue" very well may not be as adept at financial/economic 'decisions' as we thought; the "Invisible Senator" is suffering for it, right along with him!!
Like: Barney Frank's net worth of between $1.9-$4.5 million. Frank's Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide Financial payoffs combined with his Washington area brothel(s), it should be far higher. Maybe he's just "packin' the fudge" regarding his required financial reporting!!
This URL (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArZJzmIoVZE0dDNzc1h0bHpjVk50Wkh6MlVwRkxRcnc#gid=0) will allow you to check the financial goings-on of your representative and senators. Enjoy the read!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/money/personal-finance/47-congress-are-millionaires-just-1-rest-us


Labels:
Barney Frank,
Congressional,
countrywide financial,
fannie mae,
freddie mac,
Gillibrand,
Issa,
Kerry,
millionaires,
obama,
pinky reid,
schumer
Sunday, December 11, 2011
The Sunday 'Report;' 12/11/2011
What The National Pamphleteers Don't Report:
Obama's 'Tax Cut' Just One Item in a Holiday Spending Spree
by Brian H. Darling
Humanevents.com
December 5, 2011
The Obama class warfare campaign is in high gear.
There are many must-pass bills for Congress to consider before year’s end, giving President Obama leverage to promote his class-warfare agenda. The President has demanded that Congress continue and expand his payroll tax cut. His stimulus bill contained a 2% cut of the 6.2% Social Security tax rate, and to offset the loss of revenue, Obama would impose a 3.25% surtax on Americans making more than $1 million a year. The Obama “tax cut” would actually not reduce the tax burden by one cent. The Obama tax cut isn’t pro-growth for two reasons: It’s not a permanent or a net reduction in taxes. It’s merely another campaign ploy by President Obama to attack the wallets of upper-middle class and wealthy Americans.
Getting Paid Not to Work
Another issue being debated is an extension of unemployment benefits. By Dec. 31, benefits for the long-term unemployed who receive 99 weeks of income support will run out. Most expect a bill to pass to pay individuals not to work. Liberals don’t want to cut spending elsewhere to pay for an extension of these benefits. They even argued that this costly program should have been part of the Super Committee deal to reduce the deficit. They want this passed, and they don’t care about the cost to the taxpayers. Liberals argue that the extension of unemployment benefits provides a stimulus to the economy. James Sherk and Karen Campbell of The Heritage Foundation produced [....]
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Heritage%2BHotsheet&id=47935
13 Cities Where Home Prices Are Falling Dangerously
by Morgan Brennan
Forbes.com
December 8, 2011
(1 of 15-photos/text)
Cities Where Home Prices Are Falling Dangerously The folks at Local Market Monitor compiled a list of the 13 cities that suffered relatively big home price hits this year with more projected through the next 12 months. LMM sifted through market data for more than 300 [....]
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mhj45gihj/cities-where-home-prices-are-falling-dangerously
Fact Checking the Iowa Debate
by ABC News
December 10, 2011Fact Check 1 - We’ll lose 1.6 million jobs over five years under the affordable healthcare act.
Fact Check 2 - Newt Gingrich would build a colony on the moon.
Fact Check 3 - Payroll tax cut: band-aid, gimmick or something else all together?
Fact Check 4 – Romney’s record on the Affordable Care Act.
Fact Check 5 – HPV vaccine vs. Romney’s health care plan.
Fact Check 6 – Palestinians as an “invented” people?
Fact or Fiction Number 1 - We’ll lose 1.6 million jobs over five years under the affordable healthcare act.
ABC News’ Amy Bingham reports:
GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann came out swinging at the ABC News Iowa debate Saturday night, but rather than taking a jab at her comrades on stage, the Minnesota congresswoman directed her ire at President Obama.
In her first answer of the evening Bachmann blasted the president’s health care legislation, saying the Affordable Care Act would kill 1.6 million jobs.
“We can cut government bureaucracy, which is Obamacare,” Bachmann said. “N.F.I.B. tells us, that’s the small [....]
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/fact-checking-the-debate-in-iowa/
Providing In-State Tuition for Illegal Aliens: A Violation of Federal Law
by Hans von Spakovsky
Charles Stimson
November 22, 2011
Federal law prohibits state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State”—unless the same in-state rates are offered to all citizens of the United States. Today, 12 states are circumventing this federal law, and the legal arguments offered to justify such actions are untenable, no matter what other policy arguments are offered in their defense. Because at least one federal court of appeals has held that there is no private right of action under the specific statute in question—§ 1623 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996—the U.S. Department of Justice must enforce this statutory provision against states that have violated federal law. Yet even as it sues states like Arizona and Alabama for trying to assist the enforcement of federal immigration law, the U.S. government refuses to sue states that are incontrovertibly and brazenly violating an unambiguous federal immigration law. Such inaction is unacceptable: The President and the Attorney General have an obligation to enforce every provision of the United State’s comprehensive federal immigration regulations—including the federal law prohibiting state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State.”
In 1996, Congress passed—and President Bill Clinton signed into law—the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA).[i] Section 1623 of this federal statute prohibits state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State” unless the same in-state rates are offered to all citizens of the United States.[ii] Today, 12 states[iii] allow individuals who are in the United States illegally to pay the same in-state tuition rates as legal residents of the states[iv]—without providing the same rates to others. By circumventing the requirements of § 1623 these states are violating federal law, and the legal arguments offered to justify such actions are untenable, no matter what other policy arguments are offered in their defense.
A Nation of Laws, Not of Men
The United States is a country of immigrants—men and women who sought opportunity and freedom in an exceptional new land. Americans take pride in their heritage and this country’s generous policies regarding legal immigration. Yet, as citizens of a sovereign nation, Americans retain the right to decide who can and cannot enter this country—and what terms immigrants and visitors must accept as a condition of residing in the United States. As mandated [....]
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/providing-in-state-tuition-for-illegal-aliens-a-violation-of-federal-law?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell
The Covert Intelligence War Against Iran
by Scott Stewart,
STRATFOR.com
December 8, 2011
There has been a lot of talk in the press lately about a “cold war” being waged by the United States, Israel and other U.S. allies against Iran. Such a struggle is certainly taking place, but in order to place recent developments in perspective, it is important to recognize that the covert intelligence war against Iran (and the Iranian response to this war) is clearly not a new phenomenon. Indeed, STRATFOR has been chronicling this struggle since early 2007. Our coverage has included analyses of events such as the defection to the West of Iranian officials with knowledge of Tehran’s nuclear program; the Iranian seizure of British servicemen in the Shatt al Arab Waterway; the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists; the use of the Stuxnet worm to cripple Iranian uranium enrichment efforts; and Iranian efforts to arm its proxies and use them as a threat to counteract Western pressure. These proxies are most visible in Iraq and Lebanon, but they also exist in Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, the Palestinian territories, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.
While the covert intelligence war has been under way for many years, the tempo of events that can readily be identified as part of it has been increasing over the past few months. It is important to note that many of these events are the result of hidden processes begun months or even years previously, so while visible events may indeed be increasing, the efforts responsible for many of them began to increase much earlier. What the activities of recent months do tell us is that the covert war between Iran and its enemies will not be [....]
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20111207-covert-intelligence-war-against-iran?utm_source=freelist-f&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=111208&utm_term=sweekly&utm_content=readmore&elq=dbd767cda712466b91d2fa37ca513b89
Interest soars in US peer-to-peer lending
By Matt Kennard and Shannon Bond
Financial Times
November 24, 2011
When Greg Dawson wanted to start his own photography business after graduating from college in 2003, he knew he needed money for expensive equipment and marketing materials to spread the word. He walked into his local Bank of America branch, asked for a small business loan – and was rejected.
“I was just starting out in my career, with college debt and no assets,” he said. “They just laughed at me.”
A Google search, however, led him to Prosper, the pioneer of the peer-to-peer lending sector. P2P lending connects borrowers with lenders, with P2P companies taking a percentage from both sides of the transaction. In the wake of the financial crisis, bank lending remains depressed even as hints of confidence have begun to return, and people are [....]
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2345e94a-0bb1-11e1-9a61-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1gE7HmsUq
[Invisible Senator] Gillibrand’s faux fix
Loophole-ridden ethics ‘reform’
by Michael A. Walsh
New York Post
December 1, 2011
‘Yes, many of our men have grown rich in politics. I’ve made a big fortune out of the game, and I’m gettin’ richer every day . . . there’s an honest graft, and I’m an example of how it works. I might sum up the whole thing by sayin’: I seen my opportunities and I took ’em.”
That was Tammany Hall leader George Washington Plunkitt, explaining back at the turn of the last century how it was that so many political leaders had become wealthy in “public service.” But today’s pols make the old corrupt Democratic Party machine that ruled New York City for nearly a century look like pikers.
Pelosi’s pal: Kirsten Gillibrand’s bill wouldn’t do enough to end congressional insider trading.
Take the disclosures two weeks ago on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that Congress is effectively exempt from insider-trading laws, and that members routinely act on nonpublic financial information that they acquire while doing the “people’s business” to boost their personal-investment portfolios. Reporter Steve Kroft grilled former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on her uncanny trading ability: “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO [initial public offering] deal from Visa at a time there was major legislation affecting the credit-card companies making its way through the House.”
Coincidentally, Pelosi’s net worth leaped 62 percent last year, to at least $35.2 million, attributed in news reports to “stock gains and smart investments.”
She’s not alone. Even in a down economy, House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Major Leader Harry Reid and many others in Congress also saw handsome net-worth increases. In fact, some 245 of the 535 Congress members are millionaires, putting them squarely in the “one percent” that the Occupy Wall Street rabble is allegedly protesting.
Yet Pelosi could only sputter in reply: “I don’t know what your point is of your question.”
She may be the only one who can’t figure it out. Americans are finally waking up to the fact that we are ruled by oligarchs, many of whom entered Congress as folks of modest means and leave as millionaires and billionaires.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the estimated median net worth of a US senator now stands at $2.56 million — a remarkable feat considering that congressional base pay is $174,000 a year. In addition to Social Security, members also get a generous retirement plan and health-care benefits, as well as an annual automatic cost-of-living increase — unless they vote not to accept it. On top of all that, they get pensions that start at 80 percent of a qualifying member’s final salary. No wonder they spend so much money to win office and fight so hard to stay there. Still, with public satisfaction with Congress at near-record lows, the stench is getting hard to ignore. Which is why Congress is pretending to do something about its appalling ethical problems. In the wake of the “60 Minutes” report, the House Ethics Committee issued a toothless warning against the use of nonpublic information to line members’ personal coffers, and two senators introduced legislation to stop congressional insider trading.
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) introduced his STOCK (Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge) Act, which would prohibit Pelosi-like shenanigans by Congress members and executive-branch officials. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) followed him with her own version [....]
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/gillibrand_faux_fix_Gx4rwe8yWJtLdujpaR9GpL
JPMorgan Says Top European Stocks May Soar 84%
JPMorgan (JPM) expects European countries to get their house in order, boosting some shares by as much as 84% in the next 12 months.
Contributed by Thestreet.com
Forbes,
December 7, 2011 The U.S. investment bank identifies the shares of 30 companies in various industries that are worth buying heading into 2012. Most of the top picks are diversified across countries, though there’s a concentration in France and Germany, the most stable in the eurozone. A portfolio of JPMorgan’s top European picks for 2011 would have declined by 11% so far this year, compared with the benchmark Stoxx Europe 600 Index’s 12% drop. EADS, a Dutch aerospace and defense company, was the best-performing pick this year, up 25%. Carmaker PSA Peugeot Citroen was the firm’s worst selection, down 50%.
Monday was a big day for Europe. France and Germany told the European Union that they must decide if they will accept greater central control over their national budgets. Then Standard & Poor’s said it may cut Germany’s and France’s AAA credit ratings as the agency put 15 euro nations on review for a possible downgrade. U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is currently on a three-day trip to Europe to push European leaders to commit [....]
http://www.forbes.com/sites/thestreet/2011/12/07/jpmorgan-says-top-european-stocks-may-soar-84/
Rankings: Coughlin, Garrett on shaky ground
by Michael Silver,
Yahoo! Sports
December 7, 2011
It’s a battle for first place in the NFC East – with, potentially, one bummer of a booby prize.
For coaches Tom Coughlin and Jason Garrett, a defeat on Sunday night at Cowboys Stadium could be a hard shove toward the unemployment line. With Coughlin’s Giants (6-6) already reeling from a four-game losing streak and Garrett’s Cowboys coming off a brutal overtime defeat to the Cardinals that can be easily traced to the coach’s clock mismanagement, the specter of an ignominious collapse looms for the loser.
Heightening the drama is the perception that a pair of big-name coaches are hovering in the shadows as prospective replacements. There has long been a sense that Bill Cowher, who coached the Steelers to a pair of Super Bowls before stepping aside five seasons ago, regards the Giants as his [....]
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-silver_rankings_coughlin_garrett_giants_cowboys_120711
Congressional Salaries of Past Year
by Legistorm Staff
Legistorm.com
December, 2011
Our congressional staff salary data comes from the official records of the House and Senate. We currently have House salary data for the period covering October 1, 2000 to September 30, 2011 and Senate data from October 1, 2000 to September 30, 2011.
The amounts shown are not annual salaries but gross salary payments made during the periods shown. Read more about congressional staff salaries.
Browse Staff Salaries By ... [....]
http://www.legistorm.com/salaries.html
Until Next Sunday....
Obama's 'Tax Cut' Just One Item in a Holiday Spending Spree
by Brian H. Darling
Humanevents.com
December 5, 2011
The Obama class warfare campaign is in high gear.
There are many must-pass bills for Congress to consider before year’s end, giving President Obama leverage to promote his class-warfare agenda. The President has demanded that Congress continue and expand his payroll tax cut. His stimulus bill contained a 2% cut of the 6.2% Social Security tax rate, and to offset the loss of revenue, Obama would impose a 3.25% surtax on Americans making more than $1 million a year. The Obama “tax cut” would actually not reduce the tax burden by one cent. The Obama tax cut isn’t pro-growth for two reasons: It’s not a permanent or a net reduction in taxes. It’s merely another campaign ploy by President Obama to attack the wallets of upper-middle class and wealthy Americans.
Getting Paid Not to Work
Another issue being debated is an extension of unemployment benefits. By Dec. 31, benefits for the long-term unemployed who receive 99 weeks of income support will run out. Most expect a bill to pass to pay individuals not to work. Liberals don’t want to cut spending elsewhere to pay for an extension of these benefits. They even argued that this costly program should have been part of the Super Committee deal to reduce the deficit. They want this passed, and they don’t care about the cost to the taxpayers. Liberals argue that the extension of unemployment benefits provides a stimulus to the economy. James Sherk and Karen Campbell of The Heritage Foundation produced [....]
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Heritage%2BHotsheet&id=47935
13 Cities Where Home Prices Are Falling Dangerously
by Morgan Brennan
Forbes.com
December 8, 2011
(1 of 15-photos/text)
Cities Where Home Prices Are Falling Dangerously The folks at Local Market Monitor compiled a list of the 13 cities that suffered relatively big home price hits this year with more projected through the next 12 months. LMM sifted through market data for more than 300 [....]
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mhj45gihj/cities-where-home-prices-are-falling-dangerously
Fact Checking the Iowa Debate
by ABC News
December 10, 2011Fact Check 1 - We’ll lose 1.6 million jobs over five years under the affordable healthcare act.
Fact Check 2 - Newt Gingrich would build a colony on the moon.
Fact Check 3 - Payroll tax cut: band-aid, gimmick or something else all together?
Fact Check 4 – Romney’s record on the Affordable Care Act.
Fact Check 5 – HPV vaccine vs. Romney’s health care plan.
Fact Check 6 – Palestinians as an “invented” people?
Fact or Fiction Number 1 - We’ll lose 1.6 million jobs over five years under the affordable healthcare act.
ABC News’ Amy Bingham reports:
GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann came out swinging at the ABC News Iowa debate Saturday night, but rather than taking a jab at her comrades on stage, the Minnesota congresswoman directed her ire at President Obama.
In her first answer of the evening Bachmann blasted the president’s health care legislation, saying the Affordable Care Act would kill 1.6 million jobs.
“We can cut government bureaucracy, which is Obamacare,” Bachmann said. “N.F.I.B. tells us, that’s the small [....]
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/fact-checking-the-debate-in-iowa/
Providing In-State Tuition for Illegal Aliens: A Violation of Federal Law
by Hans von Spakovsky
Charles Stimson
November 22, 2011
Federal law prohibits state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State”—unless the same in-state rates are offered to all citizens of the United States. Today, 12 states are circumventing this federal law, and the legal arguments offered to justify such actions are untenable, no matter what other policy arguments are offered in their defense. Because at least one federal court of appeals has held that there is no private right of action under the specific statute in question—§ 1623 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996—the U.S. Department of Justice must enforce this statutory provision against states that have violated federal law. Yet even as it sues states like Arizona and Alabama for trying to assist the enforcement of federal immigration law, the U.S. government refuses to sue states that are incontrovertibly and brazenly violating an unambiguous federal immigration law. Such inaction is unacceptable: The President and the Attorney General have an obligation to enforce every provision of the United State’s comprehensive federal immigration regulations—including the federal law prohibiting state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State.”
In 1996, Congress passed—and President Bill Clinton signed into law—the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA).[i] Section 1623 of this federal statute prohibits state colleges and universities from providing in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens “on the basis of residence within the State” unless the same in-state rates are offered to all citizens of the United States.[ii] Today, 12 states[iii] allow individuals who are in the United States illegally to pay the same in-state tuition rates as legal residents of the states[iv]—without providing the same rates to others. By circumventing the requirements of § 1623 these states are violating federal law, and the legal arguments offered to justify such actions are untenable, no matter what other policy arguments are offered in their defense.
A Nation of Laws, Not of Men
The United States is a country of immigrants—men and women who sought opportunity and freedom in an exceptional new land. Americans take pride in their heritage and this country’s generous policies regarding legal immigration. Yet, as citizens of a sovereign nation, Americans retain the right to decide who can and cannot enter this country—and what terms immigrants and visitors must accept as a condition of residing in the United States. As mandated [....]
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/11/providing-in-state-tuition-for-illegal-aliens-a-violation-of-federal-law?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell
The Covert Intelligence War Against Iran
by Scott Stewart,
STRATFOR.com
December 8, 2011
There has been a lot of talk in the press lately about a “cold war” being waged by the United States, Israel and other U.S. allies against Iran. Such a struggle is certainly taking place, but in order to place recent developments in perspective, it is important to recognize that the covert intelligence war against Iran (and the Iranian response to this war) is clearly not a new phenomenon. Indeed, STRATFOR has been chronicling this struggle since early 2007. Our coverage has included analyses of events such as the defection to the West of Iranian officials with knowledge of Tehran’s nuclear program; the Iranian seizure of British servicemen in the Shatt al Arab Waterway; the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists; the use of the Stuxnet worm to cripple Iranian uranium enrichment efforts; and Iranian efforts to arm its proxies and use them as a threat to counteract Western pressure. These proxies are most visible in Iraq and Lebanon, but they also exist in Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, the Palestinian territories, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.
While the covert intelligence war has been under way for many years, the tempo of events that can readily be identified as part of it has been increasing over the past few months. It is important to note that many of these events are the result of hidden processes begun months or even years previously, so while visible events may indeed be increasing, the efforts responsible for many of them began to increase much earlier. What the activities of recent months do tell us is that the covert war between Iran and its enemies will not be [....]
http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20111207-covert-intelligence-war-against-iran?utm_source=freelist-f&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=111208&utm_term=sweekly&utm_content=readmore&elq=dbd767cda712466b91d2fa37ca513b89
Interest soars in US peer-to-peer lending
By Matt Kennard and Shannon Bond
Financial Times
November 24, 2011
When Greg Dawson wanted to start his own photography business after graduating from college in 2003, he knew he needed money for expensive equipment and marketing materials to spread the word. He walked into his local Bank of America branch, asked for a small business loan – and was rejected.
“I was just starting out in my career, with college debt and no assets,” he said. “They just laughed at me.”
A Google search, however, led him to Prosper, the pioneer of the peer-to-peer lending sector. P2P lending connects borrowers with lenders, with P2P companies taking a percentage from both sides of the transaction. In the wake of the financial crisis, bank lending remains depressed even as hints of confidence have begun to return, and people are [....]
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2345e94a-0bb1-11e1-9a61-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1gE7HmsUq
[Invisible Senator] Gillibrand’s faux fix
Loophole-ridden ethics ‘reform’
by Michael A. Walsh
New York Post
December 1, 2011
‘Yes, many of our men have grown rich in politics. I’ve made a big fortune out of the game, and I’m gettin’ richer every day . . . there’s an honest graft, and I’m an example of how it works. I might sum up the whole thing by sayin’: I seen my opportunities and I took ’em.”
That was Tammany Hall leader George Washington Plunkitt, explaining back at the turn of the last century how it was that so many political leaders had become wealthy in “public service.” But today’s pols make the old corrupt Democratic Party machine that ruled New York City for nearly a century look like pikers.
Pelosi’s pal: Kirsten Gillibrand’s bill wouldn’t do enough to end congressional insider trading.
Take the disclosures two weeks ago on CBS’s “60 Minutes” that Congress is effectively exempt from insider-trading laws, and that members routinely act on nonpublic financial information that they acquire while doing the “people’s business” to boost their personal-investment portfolios. Reporter Steve Kroft grilled former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on her uncanny trading ability: “I wanted to ask you why you and your husband back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large IPO [initial public offering] deal from Visa at a time there was major legislation affecting the credit-card companies making its way through the House.”
Coincidentally, Pelosi’s net worth leaped 62 percent last year, to at least $35.2 million, attributed in news reports to “stock gains and smart investments.”
She’s not alone. Even in a down economy, House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Major Leader Harry Reid and many others in Congress also saw handsome net-worth increases. In fact, some 245 of the 535 Congress members are millionaires, putting them squarely in the “one percent” that the Occupy Wall Street rabble is allegedly protesting.
Yet Pelosi could only sputter in reply: “I don’t know what your point is of your question.”
She may be the only one who can’t figure it out. Americans are finally waking up to the fact that we are ruled by oligarchs, many of whom entered Congress as folks of modest means and leave as millionaires and billionaires.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the estimated median net worth of a US senator now stands at $2.56 million — a remarkable feat considering that congressional base pay is $174,000 a year. In addition to Social Security, members also get a generous retirement plan and health-care benefits, as well as an annual automatic cost-of-living increase — unless they vote not to accept it. On top of all that, they get pensions that start at 80 percent of a qualifying member’s final salary. No wonder they spend so much money to win office and fight so hard to stay there. Still, with public satisfaction with Congress at near-record lows, the stench is getting hard to ignore. Which is why Congress is pretending to do something about its appalling ethical problems. In the wake of the “60 Minutes” report, the House Ethics Committee issued a toothless warning against the use of nonpublic information to line members’ personal coffers, and two senators introduced legislation to stop congressional insider trading.
Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) introduced his STOCK (Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge) Act, which would prohibit Pelosi-like shenanigans by Congress members and executive-branch officials. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) followed him with her own version [....]
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/gillibrand_faux_fix_Gx4rwe8yWJtLdujpaR9GpL
JPMorgan Says Top European Stocks May Soar 84%
JPMorgan (JPM) expects European countries to get their house in order, boosting some shares by as much as 84% in the next 12 months.
Contributed by Thestreet.com
Forbes,
December 7, 2011 The U.S. investment bank identifies the shares of 30 companies in various industries that are worth buying heading into 2012. Most of the top picks are diversified across countries, though there’s a concentration in France and Germany, the most stable in the eurozone. A portfolio of JPMorgan’s top European picks for 2011 would have declined by 11% so far this year, compared with the benchmark Stoxx Europe 600 Index’s 12% drop. EADS, a Dutch aerospace and defense company, was the best-performing pick this year, up 25%. Carmaker PSA Peugeot Citroen was the firm’s worst selection, down 50%.
Monday was a big day for Europe. France and Germany told the European Union that they must decide if they will accept greater central control over their national budgets. Then Standard & Poor’s said it may cut Germany’s and France’s AAA credit ratings as the agency put 15 euro nations on review for a possible downgrade. U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is currently on a three-day trip to Europe to push European leaders to commit [....]
http://www.forbes.com/sites/thestreet/2011/12/07/jpmorgan-says-top-european-stocks-may-soar-84/
Rankings: Coughlin, Garrett on shaky ground
by Michael Silver,
Yahoo! Sports
December 7, 2011
It’s a battle for first place in the NFC East – with, potentially, one bummer of a booby prize.
For coaches Tom Coughlin and Jason Garrett, a defeat on Sunday night at Cowboys Stadium could be a hard shove toward the unemployment line. With Coughlin’s Giants (6-6) already reeling from a four-game losing streak and Garrett’s Cowboys coming off a brutal overtime defeat to the Cardinals that can be easily traced to the coach’s clock mismanagement, the specter of an ignominious collapse looms for the loser.
Heightening the drama is the perception that a pair of big-name coaches are hovering in the shadows as prospective replacements. There has long been a sense that Bill Cowher, who coached the Steelers to a pair of Super Bowls before stepping aside five seasons ago, regards the Giants as his [....]
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-silver_rankings_coughlin_garrett_giants_cowboys_120711
Congressional Salaries of Past Year
by Legistorm Staff
Legistorm.com
December, 2011
Our congressional staff salary data comes from the official records of the House and Senate. We currently have House salary data for the period covering October 1, 2000 to September 30, 2011 and Senate data from October 1, 2000 to September 30, 2011.
The amounts shown are not annual salaries but gross salary payments made during the periods shown. Read more about congressional staff salaries.
Browse Staff Salaries By ... [....]
http://www.legistorm.com/salaries.html
Until Next Sunday....


Wednesday, November 9, 2011
This'n'That; November Nineth #2; Bullshit Deepens!
The Time Has Come: Impeach barack obama!!
At the outset, let me quote you 35 words:
One could conscientiously make the case for NOT impeaching "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist." That being: No where in the oath of office--for newly-immaculated rulers--does it say "....adhere to the tenets of the Constitution...."
I say: the time has long-since arrived for barack obama's impeachment! Let's forget the many, many past transgressions and focus on the Justice Department's filing suit in Federal court to block South Carolina's immigration enforcement law, set to take effect on January 1, 2012. The "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" regime is taking exception to portions of the law which inconveniences their illegal alien voter block.
What's even more distasteful than the current regime failing to honor any-and-all states rights constitutional provisions: foreign entities may be allowed to collude with the "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime in formulating US DOMESTIC law!! Sixteen countries--most of them, third-world ratholes (Mexico, Honduras, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay)--have filed to join the litigation against a state entirely within the United States: South Carolina!
The Mexican government has stated it "has an interest in protecting it's citizens and insuring their ethnicity is not used as a basis for state-sanctioned acts of bias and discrimination."
I might ask were was this governmental concern when 200 Mexican citizens were recently murdered by drug cartel actions; some with "Fast 'n' Furious" weapons!!
Mexican officials also had the balls to say "some of the law's provisions would criminalize immigration and could lead to selective application of the law. It's enforcement could adversely affect the civil rights of Mexican nationals living in South Carolina or visiting that state."
I might just say--even though the aforementioned Mexicans may have huge balls--the Mexican government really doesn't "give-two-hoots-in-Hell" unless provoked by the owe-bama Regime or paid off by George Soros to stir the political shit! If there were actual caring, would they "roll-over-and-play-dead" at the dictates of the dozen-or-so drug cartels controlling most of the land mass known as Mexico?!? The time has arrived for illegal to be illegal!!
These sixteen countries' attempts to formulate American domestic policy is tatamount to the United States using returning soldiers, sailors, marines and their materiel south of the border in eradicating said drug cartels, with a level of force and violence unknown to the miscreants or the Mexican government!!
Navy Seals, Army Rangers, Delta Force operatives and Marine Recon members can "break a whole lot'ta shit in NOT a whole lot'ta time!!"
Would these foreigners--or any other country--stand for this intrusion into their domestic policy?!? I think not!! Why should the U.S. citizen accept foreign influence?!?
The "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime is constantly using 'constitutionality' as a truncheon in their quest to render the United States a communist-fascist-socialist country. Where is the 'constitutionality' in allowing various 'third-world ratholes' a voice in United States domestic policy?!?
As socio-fascist as Jimmuh Cahtah was; as socio-fascist as Franklin Delano Roosevelt was, neither one of them would have allowed this travesty-of-justice to go forward!
Where are the voices of reason?!?
Where isSenator C. Ellis Schumer, The Putz of Park Avenue; the 'Invisible Senator,' Kirstin Gillibrand; the senile Dorothy 'Geeze-Louise' McIntosh Rodham Slaughter; Rep Ann Marie Buerkle on this issue?!? Has anyone in the congress even heard of this potential miscarriage of justice?!?
If the socio-fascists are successful in their vote-buying, voter-fraud, polling place intimidation, actions of this nature will only get worse after a second "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" immaculation!!
I think it's a good idea to copy 'n' paste this to your senators, representative, I am!!
Til Nex'Time....
At the outset, let me quote you 35 words:
"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
![]() |
"Ronaldus-Magnus" who took 'the oath' seriously! |
One could conscientiously make the case for NOT impeaching "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist." That being: No where in the oath of office--for newly-immaculated rulers--does it say "....adhere to the tenets of the Constitution...."
I say: the time has long-since arrived for barack obama's impeachment! Let's forget the many, many past transgressions and focus on the Justice Department's filing suit in Federal court to block South Carolina's immigration enforcement law, set to take effect on January 1, 2012. The "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" regime is taking exception to portions of the law which inconveniences their illegal alien voter block.
What's even more distasteful than the current regime failing to honor any-and-all states rights constitutional provisions: foreign entities may be allowed to collude with the "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime in formulating US DOMESTIC law!! Sixteen countries--most of them, third-world ratholes (Mexico, Honduras, Ecuador, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay)--have filed to join the litigation against a state entirely within the United States: South Carolina!
The Mexican government has stated it "has an interest in protecting it's citizens and insuring their ethnicity is not used as a basis for state-sanctioned acts of bias and discrimination."
I might ask were was this governmental concern when 200 Mexican citizens were recently murdered by drug cartel actions; some with "Fast 'n' Furious" weapons!!
Mexican officials also had the balls to say "some of the law's provisions would criminalize immigration and could lead to selective application of the law. It's enforcement could adversely affect the civil rights of Mexican nationals living in South Carolina or visiting that state."
I might just say--even though the aforementioned Mexicans may have huge balls--the Mexican government really doesn't "give-two-hoots-in-Hell" unless provoked by the owe-bama Regime or paid off by George Soros to stir the political shit! If there were actual caring, would they "roll-over-and-play-dead" at the dictates of the dozen-or-so drug cartels controlling most of the land mass known as Mexico?!? The time has arrived for illegal to be illegal!!
These sixteen countries' attempts to formulate American domestic policy is tatamount to the United States using returning soldiers, sailors, marines and their materiel south of the border in eradicating said drug cartels, with a level of force and violence unknown to the miscreants or the Mexican government!!
Navy Seals, Army Rangers, Delta Force operatives and Marine Recon members can "break a whole lot'ta shit in NOT a whole lot'ta time!!"
Would these foreigners--or any other country--stand for this intrusion into their domestic policy?!? I think not!! Why should the U.S. citizen accept foreign influence?!?
The "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime is constantly using 'constitutionality' as a truncheon in their quest to render the United States a communist-fascist-socialist country. Where is the 'constitutionality' in allowing various 'third-world ratholes' a voice in United States domestic policy?!?
As socio-fascist as Jimmuh Cahtah was; as socio-fascist as Franklin Delano Roosevelt was, neither one of them would have allowed this travesty-of-justice to go forward!
Where are the voices of reason?!?
Where is
If the socio-fascists are successful in their vote-buying, voter-fraud, polling place intimidation, actions of this nature will only get worse after a second "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" immaculation!!
I think it's a good idea to copy 'n' paste this to your senators, representative, I am!!
Til Nex'Time....


Friday, October 14, 2011
This'n'That; October Fourteenth #1; NY-25
An owe-bamacRATic Primary In NY-25?
The recently defeated Dan Maffei of DeWitt, N.Y., has expressed his intention of unseating the current representative, Ann Marie Buerkle in New York's 25th Congressional District. There may be 'a wrench' thrown into Mr Maffei's intentions in the name of one Brianne Murphy. While Mr Maffei is running on his usual 'carrying the water' for a failed regime as he continually did in his only term in the House. Ms Murphy--as evidenced on her campaign website--is attempting to co-opt the basic tenents of the "Tea Party" movement while subscribing to the current regime's mantra: using 'the children' when all else fails; continually displaying examples of Albert Einstein's definition of insanity; complete ignorance of the United States Constitution, et al. One can only assume that Ms Murphy also supports "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" 'under-the-table' payoffs to the various unions' hierarchy; payoffs to the regime's supporters, and payoffs to the regime's donors.
Quite obviously, I'm a conservative; a constitutionalist! I contend that 'everything wrong with the country' can be laid at the feed of our "Clown Prince." By that admission, one can expect my opinions and views to be somewhere to the right of Limbaugh, Hannity, et al!! That being said, if you're a Maffei or Murphy supporter, ya might wanna drop out here!
Dan Maffei--as a one-term representative--confirmed his liberal bent with a voting record which stretches from liberal to liberty-reducing to far-reaching as evidenced by his yea vote on S-987: To Protect girls in developing countries through the prevention of child marriage, and for other purposes.
What-the-hell business is it of the 111th Congress--or any numbered Congress, for that matter--what happens with respect to any resident of any other country, be it a 'third-world rathole' or not!! Meddling actions like this as well as the direction George Soros was taking the "Clown Prince's" regime, forced the creation of the "Tea Party" movement!
While Representative Ann Marie Buerkle squeaked out a victory in the 2010-NY25 elections, she's more than proven she's up to the task of governance! A review of Ms Buerkle's record seems to indicate a conservatism in her vote. Without the time to check each and every bill, it's difficult to tell the contents of a bill or amendment by it's title. I know from experience Ms Buerkle is quick to reply to a question or comment from her constituency, as opposed to C. Ellis Schumer or "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand. You can check the Buerkle voting record yourself, using the proper URL below.
In the case of the possible challenger to Mr Maffei's owe-bamacRATic candidacy, information on Brianne Murphy is difficult to find, well-hidden! What I've located indicates that in the unlikely event Ms Buerkle is defeated, Central New York will go-to-Hell, in a hand-basket!! Both Maffei and Murphy are progressives which is defined--by ME--as a communistic, socio-fascist, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" water-carrier!!
Information on Ms Murphy indicates a strong proclivity toward ultra-progressivism. She's steeped in the ways of the District of Corruption, having worked for the retired-Rep Jim Walsh; having worked at the National Traffic Safety Board (NTSB); having worked as a lobbyist at Hall & Associates [the principal, James Hall, as Director of the NTSB at the time of the TWA800 crash, botched the investigation; refused any information to FOIL filers; refused any communication with Don and Donna Nibert-parents of victim (16 year-old) Cheryl Nibert; unexpectedly--and without explanation--resigned his directorship two years early], among other examples of liberal, progressive employments.
In conclusion, Representative Buerkle's most formidable opponent will be Ms Murphy, presuming Murphy wins the expected primary against Mr Maffei. Again presuming, Ms Murphy--with her education and employment--is probably proficient in the progressives' "mud-slinging" campaign mode. If either of these political miscreants are victorious over Rep Buerkle, the results will be disasterous for the nation in general; for this region in particular!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.brianneforcongress.com/sept12.htm
http://murphygrouppllc.net/murphy.html
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/brianne-murphy/6/bba/96b
http://maffeiforcongress.com/welcome
Maffei record: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.xpd?year=2010&person=412297
http://www.govtrack.us/blog/2009/11/18/aye-versus-yea-whats-the-difference/
http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Ann_Marie_Buerkle?loadTab=0
Buerkle record: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.xpd?year=2011&person=412456
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_recommit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_T._Walsh
http://www.hallassoc.net/Staff/managing%20partner.htm
http://twa800.com/schulze/schulze-1-8-08.pdf
The recently defeated Dan Maffei of DeWitt, N.Y., has expressed his intention of unseating the current representative, Ann Marie Buerkle in New York's 25th Congressional District. There may be 'a wrench' thrown into Mr Maffei's intentions in the name of one Brianne Murphy. While Mr Maffei is running on his usual 'carrying the water' for a failed regime as he continually did in his only term in the House. Ms Murphy--as evidenced on her campaign website--is attempting to co-opt the basic tenents of the "Tea Party" movement while subscribing to the current regime's mantra: using 'the children' when all else fails; continually displaying examples of Albert Einstein's definition of insanity; complete ignorance of the United States Constitution, et al. One can only assume that Ms Murphy also supports "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" 'under-the-table' payoffs to the various unions' hierarchy; payoffs to the regime's supporters, and payoffs to the regime's donors.
Quite obviously, I'm a conservative; a constitutionalist! I contend that 'everything wrong with the country' can be laid at the feed of our "Clown Prince." By that admission, one can expect my opinions and views to be somewhere to the right of Limbaugh, Hannity, et al!! That being said, if you're a Maffei or Murphy supporter, ya might wanna drop out here!
Dan Maffei--as a one-term representative--confirmed his liberal bent with a voting record which stretches from liberal to liberty-reducing to far-reaching as evidenced by his yea vote on S-987: To Protect girls in developing countries through the prevention of child marriage, and for other purposes.
What-the-hell business is it of the 111th Congress--or any numbered Congress, for that matter--what happens with respect to any resident of any other country, be it a 'third-world rathole' or not!! Meddling actions like this as well as the direction George Soros was taking the "Clown Prince's" regime, forced the creation of the "Tea Party" movement!
While Representative Ann Marie Buerkle squeaked out a victory in the 2010-NY25 elections, she's more than proven she's up to the task of governance! A review of Ms Buerkle's record seems to indicate a conservatism in her vote. Without the time to check each and every bill, it's difficult to tell the contents of a bill or amendment by it's title. I know from experience Ms Buerkle is quick to reply to a question or comment from her constituency, as opposed to C. Ellis Schumer or "The Invisible Senator" Gillibrand. You can check the Buerkle voting record yourself, using the proper URL below.
In the case of the possible challenger to Mr Maffei's owe-bamacRATic candidacy, information on Brianne Murphy is difficult to find, well-hidden! What I've located indicates that in the unlikely event Ms Buerkle is defeated, Central New York will go-to-Hell, in a hand-basket!! Both Maffei and Murphy are progressives which is defined--by ME--as a communistic, socio-fascist, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" water-carrier!!
Information on Ms Murphy indicates a strong proclivity toward ultra-progressivism. She's steeped in the ways of the District of Corruption, having worked for the retired-Rep Jim Walsh; having worked at the National Traffic Safety Board (NTSB); having worked as a lobbyist at Hall & Associates [the principal, James Hall, as Director of the NTSB at the time of the TWA800 crash, botched the investigation; refused any information to FOIL filers; refused any communication with Don and Donna Nibert-parents of victim (16 year-old) Cheryl Nibert; unexpectedly--and without explanation--resigned his directorship two years early], among other examples of liberal, progressive employments.
In conclusion, Representative Buerkle's most formidable opponent will be Ms Murphy, presuming Murphy wins the expected primary against Mr Maffei. Again presuming, Ms Murphy--with her education and employment--is probably proficient in the progressives' "mud-slinging" campaign mode. If either of these political miscreants are victorious over Rep Buerkle, the results will be disasterous for the nation in general; for this region in particular!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://www.brianneforcongress.com/sept12.htm
http://murphygrouppllc.net/murphy.html
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/brianne-murphy/6/bba/96b
http://maffeiforcongress.com/welcome
Maffei record: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.xpd?year=2010&person=412297
http://www.govtrack.us/blog/2009/11/18/aye-versus-yea-whats-the-difference/
http://www.whorunsgov.com/Profiles/Ann_Marie_Buerkle?loadTab=0
Buerkle record: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes.xpd?year=2011&person=412456
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_to_recommit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_T._Walsh
http://www.hallassoc.net/Staff/managing%20partner.htm
http://twa800.com/schulze/schulze-1-8-08.pdf


Labels:
"Tea Party",
Brianne Murphy,
Buerkle,
George Soros,
Gillibrand,
Hall and Assoc,
Hannity,
James T. Walsh,
Maffei,
NTSB,
NY-25,
obama,
Rush Limbaugh,
S-987,
schumer,
Tea Party movement,
TWA800
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
This'n'That; August Twenty-Fourth #1; Gillibrand
What's Up With The "Invisible Senator?"
Has the "Invisible Senator" Kristin Gillibrand (owe-bamacRAT, NY) been released from under the thumb of C. Ellis Schumer?!? She seemingly had an original thought with regard to the 'Lockerbie Bomber,' Abdelbaset al-Megrahi.
al-Megrahi is responsible for the deaths of 189 American souls, several young adults; several college students; several from Syracuse University. He was released from a Scottish prison in August, 2009 with three-months to live.
al-Megrahi seems to have recovered somewhat; he was seen frail but in fair health at a pro-Gaddafi rally in July. The "Invisible Senator" is calling for the 'Muslim Brotherhood' to hold the terrorist accountable for his unconscionable actions resulting in the many deaths of the PanAm 103 bombing.
Is the release of Senator Gillibrand a sign that there's concern for the results of the upcoming national elections? Why else would C. Ellis Schumer allow Ms Gillibrand her own thoughts? He seemed quite comfortable doing her thinking for her!
Til Nex'Time....
Has the "Invisible Senator" Kristin Gillibrand (owe-bamacRAT, NY) been released from under the thumb of C. Ellis Schumer?!? She seemingly had an original thought with regard to the 'Lockerbie Bomber,' Abdelbaset al-Megrahi.
al-Megrahi is responsible for the deaths of 189 American souls, several young adults; several college students; several from Syracuse University. He was released from a Scottish prison in August, 2009 with three-months to live.
al-Megrahi seems to have recovered somewhat; he was seen frail but in fair health at a pro-Gaddafi rally in July. The "Invisible Senator" is calling for the 'Muslim Brotherhood' to hold the terrorist accountable for his unconscionable actions resulting in the many deaths of the PanAm 103 bombing.
Is the release of Senator Gillibrand a sign that there's concern for the results of the upcoming national elections? Why else would C. Ellis Schumer allow Ms Gillibrand her own thoughts? He seemed quite comfortable doing her thinking for her!
Til Nex'Time....


Labels:
el-Megrahi,
Gillibrand,
Lockerbie,
PanAm 103,
schumer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)