Posts
Researching owe-bama Lies on owe-bamacide!
I didn't realize this topic until Newt Gingrich brought it up in last night's (Feb 22) GOP Debate moderated by another from the long list socio-fascist pamphleteers. Mr Gingrich made the statement that "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" had voted for infanticide (or owe-bamacide) at the state (Illinois) level in 2001, 2002 and 2003!
For this narrative, infanticide means taking the life of an infant who survived a botched abortion.
The National Review Online writer Andrew C. McCarthy reported:
"[owe-bama's] abortion extremism is such that, as a state senator, he opposed protection for--I'll use his words here--'that fetus or child, however way you want to describe it' when contrary to wishes of the women involved and their abortionists there was movement or some indication that, that they're not coming out limp and dead.' Babies were inconveniently being born alive, self-styled health care providers carted them off to a utility room where they were left to die. That is infanticide, plain and simple. In Illinois, people tried to stop this barbarism by supporting 'born alive' legislation. [owe-bama] opposed them all the way."
This sheds a whole new light on "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist's" position on the Catholic contraception issue.... even though he 'claims' two daughters, he seems not to like children. I'm thinkin' that if--in fact--he actually DID impregnate "Michelle Antoinette" twice, the obama girls are lucky to be alive!! He held this owe-bamacide position OUTSIDE the confines of owe-bamaKare!!
Til Nex'Time....
http://factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/02/22/newt_to_media_remember_when_obama_voted_for_infanticide
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290707/when-obama-voted-infanticide-andrew-c-mccarthy
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Monday, February 6, 2012
This'n'That; February Sixth #1; Who Can....?!?
Which Candidate Is Most Capable?!?
A given truism: "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" has proven time-and-again over the past three-plus years that neither is he up to the task of righting the American economy, nor is he adept at finding those advisors whose advice will point the country in the right direction!! As most of my blogs state: at any given moment, in any populated room "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" is the least experienced amongst said population.
At the end of January, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released it's projections covering the years 2012 through 2022. If we continue along the same path--with the same 'players'--a dismal future, indeed!! "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" has the country facing a deficit exceeding $1.1 TRILLION for 2012 and about the same level each year of the ten-year projection.
The onus--dear friends--is on you and I to determine the most electable GOP candidate best equipped to manage the budget, reduce spending and bring the deficit under control. Given the vast divergence of the three possible contestants, the act-of-choosing--as well as the resultant choice--will be of gargantuan importance!!
Willard Mitt Romney:
*Mr Romney was offered and subsequently accepted the position of President and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games of 2002. Mr Romney's crowning achievement as the olympic chief was the reversal of a $379 Million projected loss into a $100 Million profit. (Not only did Mr and Mrs Romney donate $1 Million in personal funds to the olympics, Mr Romney donated the entirety of his $1.4 Million in salary and severance payments to charity.)
*As 'Candidate Romney,' he ran for the governorship of Massachusetts as a self-proclaimed 'moderate with progressive views.' As Governor of Massachusetts, Governor Romney was faced with a democRATically controlled legislature.
*In the business world, Mitt Romney went into consultancy after graduation from Harvard--both the business and law schools--initally working for Boston Consulting Group (BCG). He was then lured to Bain and Company. Bain was initially organized by former employees of BCG. Mr Romney left Bain and Company to co-found Bain Capital in 1984. Mr Romney's early successes were the formation of Staples, Inc., and the Sports Authority as well as turning around Domino's Pizza.
Newton "Newt" Gingrich:
Newt--finally, after his third campaign--was elected to the U.S. House, taking office on January 3, 1979 and continued to be re-elected until he left his House seat (at other republicRATics' request) in January 3, 1999. Newt's notable--and not-so-notable--accomplishments were the formation of the Congressional Military Reform Caucus (MRC-1981), the Congressional Space and Aviation Caucus (ASC-1981), the Conservative Opportunity Society (COS-1983). While Mr Gingrich claims to be--and is viewed as the author of--the "Contract With America," the plan was actually authored by allegedly conservative economist Larry Hunter with lots of help from the Heritage Foundation, Representatives Gingrich, Robert Walker, Dick Armey, Bill Paxon, Tom DeLay, John Boehner as well as several principles from "Ronaldus-Magnus'" 1985 State of the Union Address.
During most of his Congressional career, Mr Gingrich is viewed as a 'whiney-ass,' invariably ready to roll-over-and-play-dead to complete a personal objective, regardless of the affects on the American citizen; the American taxpayer. While revealing and complaining about the House Banking Scandal , Gingrich was a lesser-participant--22 kited-checks including paying his taxes: IRS $9,463.00--compared with the worst violators: Rep Robinson (Ar,d) 996 kited checks; Rep Mrazek (NY-d) 990 kited checks!
Newt Gingrich--so far as I can find--has never worked for wages in a private sector business as did Mr Romney and Mr Paul. Before and after his stint in the House of Representatives, Mr Gingrich was either in acedemia or in public policy and consultancy positions. Most recently, Mr Gingrich was noted for his fiery responses to the national media debate moderators. These actions seem entirely for 'public consumption,' and Gingrich would never 'take-it-to' "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" in a presidential debate!!
Richard J. "Rick" Santorum:
A career politician and lawyer, Mr Santorum thus far, has spent 4 years in the U.S. House and 12 years in the U.S. Senate. During his federal tenure, he has been 'all-over-the-map' in political philosophy; from prohibiting employers from permanently replacing striking workers to exposing members of Congress involved in the House Banking Scandal. Mr Santorum has been accused of pandering to various ideological positions such as zionist organizations with his 'ideologocal diversity' which has been described as 'policing thought.' Although never proven, it's been alleged Rick Santorum was involved in the 'K-Street Project.' The 'project' involved demanding Washington lobbyists hire republicRATics for high-level positions and rewarding GOP lobbyists with access to high level republicRATic politicians. As a debater 'Rick' can be proud of standing on his positions within the debated topics, rather than descending into name-calling and quasi-defamation.
Rick Santorum's private sector employment has been as a lawyer. Most of his non-federal employment has been in the state and regional political arena.
Ronald E. "Ron" Paul:
In August 2012 (and on his improbable inauguration), Mr Paul will be 77 years old, plenty 'seasoned' for the U. S. presidency. Never has an individual in his seventies been inaugurated president; "Ronaldus-Magnus" being the current oldest president at his first inauguration at 69 years, 11 months. In comparison, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist"--in all his shining inexperience--was 47 years, 5 months at his first, last and only inauguration!
Mr Paul was educated in Pennsylvania, achieving a B.S. in biology as well as Duke University, School of Medicine, earning his medical degree in 1961. Much to his credit, Ron Paul has refused to sign up for an entitled government pension, saying it would be 'hypocritical and immoral.' During Mr Paul's 22-year tenure, he's sponsored 468+ pieces of legislation. If the entire Congress had the same tenure and the same propensity for saddling the American citizens with ever more loss of independence and liberty, we'd have had 203,580 pieces of legislation!! Who's to say we haven't had?!?
Ron Paul has not faired well during the 2012 GOP presidential nomination campaign. He--in some races--scores fairly well, but not with the voter percentages needed to continue to be a viable candidate. He gains voter support with his libertarian and foreign policy views; he fails to gain additional voter support for the same reasons! During the seemingly daily debates, Dr Paul--rather than articulating his opinions on the posed questions--verbally jaunts off on a foreign policy; on a 'bomb-the-Fed' rant!
All-in-all, the daunting task here is to settle on the most conservative, electable candidate who can take-it-to "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" both in any presidential debates and in the general election. The "Clown Prince" is an excellent speaker when left to his teleprompter. How would he be if there were an unscripted debate?!? Will there be an unscripted debate?!? We have to also realize that all the questions in any debate will be approved by the debaters; no surprises, no actual questions on the problems facing the country, just those to boost the value of either or both competitors.
As I see it, Dr--Representative--Ron Paul is pretty much a 'throw-away' candidate; in the process to drag support away from the one or two viable, electable candidates.
While most staunch conservatives--libertarians--enjoy the fiery discourse between Newt Gingrich, the debate moderator and the other candidates, his polling ups-and-downs garner only moderate net support. The 'fire' is fun to watch but if nominated, will Mr Gingrich have the same 'fire' in any presidential debates?!? I think not!! There's an unwritten rule that no one is to attack "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" on the issues. It's a given the media will be biased toward the "Clown Prince," so any GOP nominee will have automatically two foes on the debate stage, right from the start. Said candidate must be prepared to battle both foes!
Mr Santorum seems to have no 'ignition switch;' how and where do we turn him on?!? He speaks well on most issues, but where's the fire?!? Where's the passion?!? I've not seen it before, I'm not seeing it now!! He tries to give the impression that he's the 'lone outsider' in the crowd. Nay, Mr Santorum is every bit the insider that all other candidates are!
Mr Romney is a conservative much the same way "Ronaldus-Magnus" was a progressive liberal; neither are or were, Mr Romney is a conservative in voice only; President Reagan NEVER would have been a progressive liberal-in voice or in action!! As Mr Romney tries to pander to every possible voter in the country, he continues to attempt to justify RomneyKare and has never taken responsibility for increasing the Massachusetts taxpayers' financial obligations relating to said force-fed health care. In a presidential debate, the first thing "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" will do is to thank Mr Romney for the basis for--and his consultancy on--owe-bamaKare!! This immediately takes one arrow from the sparcely populated Romney quiver. Mr Romney has two degrees; one we are in dire need of: the MBA; the other we have too many of in government, aleady: juris doctor! I'm beginning to believe 'the fix is in!' The media and George Soros have chosen our candidate for us and their choice is--wait for it--Mitt Romney!!
We have some hard decisions to make, you and I!
Til Nex'Time....
A given truism: "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" has proven time-and-again over the past three-plus years that neither is he up to the task of righting the American economy, nor is he adept at finding those advisors whose advice will point the country in the right direction!! As most of my blogs state: at any given moment, in any populated room "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" is the least experienced amongst said population.
At the end of January, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released it's projections covering the years 2012 through 2022. If we continue along the same path--with the same 'players'--a dismal future, indeed!! "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" has the country facing a deficit exceeding $1.1 TRILLION for 2012 and about the same level each year of the ten-year projection.
The onus--dear friends--is on you and I to determine the most electable GOP candidate best equipped to manage the budget, reduce spending and bring the deficit under control. Given the vast divergence of the three possible contestants, the act-of-choosing--as well as the resultant choice--will be of gargantuan importance!!
Willard Mitt Romney:
*Mr Romney was offered and subsequently accepted the position of President and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games of 2002. Mr Romney's crowning achievement as the olympic chief was the reversal of a $379 Million projected loss into a $100 Million profit. (Not only did Mr and Mrs Romney donate $1 Million in personal funds to the olympics, Mr Romney donated the entirety of his $1.4 Million in salary and severance payments to charity.)
*As 'Candidate Romney,' he ran for the governorship of Massachusetts as a self-proclaimed 'moderate with progressive views.' As Governor of Massachusetts, Governor Romney was faced with a democRATically controlled legislature.
*In the business world, Mitt Romney went into consultancy after graduation from Harvard--both the business and law schools--initally working for Boston Consulting Group (BCG). He was then lured to Bain and Company. Bain was initially organized by former employees of BCG. Mr Romney left Bain and Company to co-found Bain Capital in 1984. Mr Romney's early successes were the formation of Staples, Inc., and the Sports Authority as well as turning around Domino's Pizza.
Newton "Newt" Gingrich:
Newt--finally, after his third campaign--was elected to the U.S. House, taking office on January 3, 1979 and continued to be re-elected until he left his House seat (at other republicRATics' request) in January 3, 1999. Newt's notable--and not-so-notable--accomplishments were the formation of the Congressional Military Reform Caucus (MRC-1981), the Congressional Space and Aviation Caucus (ASC-1981), the Conservative Opportunity Society (COS-1983). While Mr Gingrich claims to be--and is viewed as the author of--the "Contract With America," the plan was actually authored by allegedly conservative economist Larry Hunter with lots of help from the Heritage Foundation, Representatives Gingrich, Robert Walker, Dick Armey, Bill Paxon, Tom DeLay, John Boehner as well as several principles from "Ronaldus-Magnus'" 1985 State of the Union Address.
During most of his Congressional career, Mr Gingrich is viewed as a 'whiney-ass,' invariably ready to roll-over-and-play-dead to complete a personal objective, regardless of the affects on the American citizen; the American taxpayer. While revealing and complaining about the House Banking Scandal , Gingrich was a lesser-participant--22 kited-checks including paying his taxes: IRS $9,463.00--compared with the worst violators: Rep Robinson (Ar,d) 996 kited checks; Rep Mrazek (NY-d) 990 kited checks!
Newt Gingrich--so far as I can find--has never worked for wages in a private sector business as did Mr Romney and Mr Paul. Before and after his stint in the House of Representatives, Mr Gingrich was either in acedemia or in public policy and consultancy positions. Most recently, Mr Gingrich was noted for his fiery responses to the national media debate moderators. These actions seem entirely for 'public consumption,' and Gingrich would never 'take-it-to' "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" in a presidential debate!!
Richard J. "Rick" Santorum:
A career politician and lawyer, Mr Santorum thus far, has spent 4 years in the U.S. House and 12 years in the U.S. Senate. During his federal tenure, he has been 'all-over-the-map' in political philosophy; from prohibiting employers from permanently replacing striking workers to exposing members of Congress involved in the House Banking Scandal. Mr Santorum has been accused of pandering to various ideological positions such as zionist organizations with his 'ideologocal diversity' which has been described as 'policing thought.' Although never proven, it's been alleged Rick Santorum was involved in the 'K-Street Project.' The 'project' involved demanding Washington lobbyists hire republicRATics for high-level positions and rewarding GOP lobbyists with access to high level republicRATic politicians. As a debater 'Rick' can be proud of standing on his positions within the debated topics, rather than descending into name-calling and quasi-defamation.
Rick Santorum's private sector employment has been as a lawyer. Most of his non-federal employment has been in the state and regional political arena.
Ronald E. "Ron" Paul:
In August 2012 (and on his improbable inauguration), Mr Paul will be 77 years old, plenty 'seasoned' for the U. S. presidency. Never has an individual in his seventies been inaugurated president; "Ronaldus-Magnus" being the current oldest president at his first inauguration at 69 years, 11 months. In comparison, "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist"--in all his shining inexperience--was 47 years, 5 months at his first, last and only inauguration!
Mr Paul was educated in Pennsylvania, achieving a B.S. in biology as well as Duke University, School of Medicine, earning his medical degree in 1961. Much to his credit, Ron Paul has refused to sign up for an entitled government pension, saying it would be 'hypocritical and immoral.' During Mr Paul's 22-year tenure, he's sponsored 468+ pieces of legislation. If the entire Congress had the same tenure and the same propensity for saddling the American citizens with ever more loss of independence and liberty, we'd have had 203,580 pieces of legislation!! Who's to say we haven't had?!?
Ron Paul has not faired well during the 2012 GOP presidential nomination campaign. He--in some races--scores fairly well, but not with the voter percentages needed to continue to be a viable candidate. He gains voter support with his libertarian and foreign policy views; he fails to gain additional voter support for the same reasons! During the seemingly daily debates, Dr Paul--rather than articulating his opinions on the posed questions--verbally jaunts off on a foreign policy; on a 'bomb-the-Fed' rant!
All-in-all, the daunting task here is to settle on the most conservative, electable candidate who can take-it-to "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" both in any presidential debates and in the general election. The "Clown Prince" is an excellent speaker when left to his teleprompter. How would he be if there were an unscripted debate?!? Will there be an unscripted debate?!? We have to also realize that all the questions in any debate will be approved by the debaters; no surprises, no actual questions on the problems facing the country, just those to boost the value of either or both competitors.
As I see it, Dr--Representative--Ron Paul is pretty much a 'throw-away' candidate; in the process to drag support away from the one or two viable, electable candidates.
While most staunch conservatives--libertarians--enjoy the fiery discourse between Newt Gingrich, the debate moderator and the other candidates, his polling ups-and-downs garner only moderate net support. The 'fire' is fun to watch but if nominated, will Mr Gingrich have the same 'fire' in any presidential debates?!? I think not!! There's an unwritten rule that no one is to attack "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" on the issues. It's a given the media will be biased toward the "Clown Prince," so any GOP nominee will have automatically two foes on the debate stage, right from the start. Said candidate must be prepared to battle both foes!
Mr Santorum seems to have no 'ignition switch;' how and where do we turn him on?!? He speaks well on most issues, but where's the fire?!? Where's the passion?!? I've not seen it before, I'm not seeing it now!! He tries to give the impression that he's the 'lone outsider' in the crowd. Nay, Mr Santorum is every bit the insider that all other candidates are!
Mr Romney is a conservative much the same way "Ronaldus-Magnus" was a progressive liberal; neither are or were, Mr Romney is a conservative in voice only; President Reagan NEVER would have been a progressive liberal-in voice or in action!! As Mr Romney tries to pander to every possible voter in the country, he continues to attempt to justify RomneyKare and has never taken responsibility for increasing the Massachusetts taxpayers' financial obligations relating to said force-fed health care. In a presidential debate, the first thing "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" will do is to thank Mr Romney for the basis for--and his consultancy on--owe-bamaKare!! This immediately takes one arrow from the sparcely populated Romney quiver. Mr Romney has two degrees; one we are in dire need of: the MBA; the other we have too many of in government, aleady: juris doctor! I'm beginning to believe 'the fix is in!' The media and George Soros have chosen our candidate for us and their choice is--wait for it--Mitt Romney!!
We have some hard decisions to make, you and I!
Til Nex'Time....
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
This'n'That; January Thirty-First #1; Engineering
LOGICAL 'Social' Engineering
The commie-libs among us have long depended upon social engineering to both placate and increase their voter base. The 'modern era' of commie-lib social engineering is generally associated with the "Slick-Willie" presidency; largely with their sham of reducing the welfareRAT rolls. The Clinton Administration along with the Newt Gingrich-led House, did little more than move the 'RATs from the welfare rolls to the SSI rolls-with the goal of the continuation and growth of 'dependency-class' Americans.
Now, fast-forward to the "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime. The regime's notion of 'social engineering' vastly outpaces the "Slick-Willie" concept. Not only does the "Clown" both continue and inhance the numbers of individual recipients of monetary benefits, he extends it to unsustainable--quasi-experimental--solar and wind energy production as well as payoffs to several of his 'favorite' politicians: Anyone remember the vote-buying payoffs involved with owe-bamaKare?!? Senator Mary Landreau ring a bell?!?
With "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" building on his successes (of national destruction) by gutting the Defense Department, here comes my suggestion of LOGICAL social engineering:
With the lagging NON-recovery; with the problematic U-3 unemployment rate in the 8.5% range; with the more accurate, actual U-6 unemployment rate in the 23% range, actually consider the short, mid and long term effects of military "down-sizing" (reduction-in-force [RIF]) relative to the unemployment rates. Currently, approximately 80,000 military "souls" have--or are scheduled to have--their asses 'kicked-to-the-curb,' both the decision for the RIF as well as the numbers involved in said RIF should be relative to the current and projected U-3 and U-6 unemployment rates. A U-3 rate of 4.5% is considered full employment. Have the RIF figures be based on national full employment, example: if the fascists want to dis-employ 100,000 military "souls," they should do so at 4.5% unemployment; 85,000 at 5.0%; 70,000 at 5.5%; 55,000 at 6.0%; 40,000 at 6.5%; 25,000 at 7.0%; 10,000 at 7.5% and ZERO at 8.0% and above!!
Not only have the vast majority of said "souls" put their lives-on-the-line on a minute-by-minute basis, they are subjected to long tours of duty away from family and friends; subjected to international moves with minimal notice! Given these military "souls" do the work "most Americans won't do," do they deserve to be tossed out of a chosen career 'on their proverbial asses?!?' I think NOT!!!
Til Nex'Time....
The commie-libs among us have long depended upon social engineering to both placate and increase their voter base. The 'modern era' of commie-lib social engineering is generally associated with the "Slick-Willie" presidency; largely with their sham of reducing the welfareRAT rolls. The Clinton Administration along with the Newt Gingrich-led House, did little more than move the 'RATs from the welfare rolls to the SSI rolls-with the goal of the continuation and growth of 'dependency-class' Americans.
Now, fast-forward to the "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" Regime. The regime's notion of 'social engineering' vastly outpaces the "Slick-Willie" concept. Not only does the "Clown" both continue and inhance the numbers of individual recipients of monetary benefits, he extends it to unsustainable--quasi-experimental--solar and wind energy production as well as payoffs to several of his 'favorite' politicians: Anyone remember the vote-buying payoffs involved with owe-bamaKare?!? Senator Mary Landreau ring a bell?!?
With "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist" building on his successes (of national destruction) by gutting the Defense Department, here comes my suggestion of LOGICAL social engineering:
With the lagging NON-recovery; with the problematic U-3 unemployment rate in the 8.5% range; with the more accurate, actual U-6 unemployment rate in the 23% range, actually consider the short, mid and long term effects of military "down-sizing" (reduction-in-force [RIF]) relative to the unemployment rates. Currently, approximately 80,000 military "souls" have--or are scheduled to have--their asses 'kicked-to-the-curb,' both the decision for the RIF as well as the numbers involved in said RIF should be relative to the current and projected U-3 and U-6 unemployment rates. A U-3 rate of 4.5% is considered full employment. Have the RIF figures be based on national full employment, example: if the fascists want to dis-employ 100,000 military "souls," they should do so at 4.5% unemployment; 85,000 at 5.0%; 70,000 at 5.5%; 55,000 at 6.0%; 40,000 at 6.5%; 25,000 at 7.0%; 10,000 at 7.5% and ZERO at 8.0% and above!!
Not only have the vast majority of said "souls" put their lives-on-the-line on a minute-by-minute basis, they are subjected to long tours of duty away from family and friends; subjected to international moves with minimal notice! Given these military "souls" do the work "most Americans won't do," do they deserve to be tossed out of a chosen career 'on their proverbial asses?!?' I think NOT!!!
Til Nex'Time....
Saturday, January 28, 2012
"Clown Prince" Weekly Blather; January 28th
A Patriotic Response To The "Clown Prince;" 01/28/2012
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
January 28, 2011
On Tuesday, in my State of the Union Address, I laid out a blueprint for an economy built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values. This week, I took that blueprint across the country, and what I saw was people who work hard and believe in each other. They believe in the America that’s within our reach. But they’re not sure that the right thing will get done in Washington this year, or next year, or the year after that. And frankly, when you look at some of the things that go on in this town, who could blame them for being a little cynical?
Just two days ago, a senator from Utah promised to obstruct every single American I appoint to a judgeship or public service position – unless I fire the consumer watchdog I put in place to protect the American people from financial schemes or malpractice. For the most part, it’s not that this senator thinks these nominees are unqualified. In fact, all of the judicial nominees being blocked have bipartisan support. And almost 90 percent have unanimous support from the Judiciary Committee. Instead, one of his aides told reporters that the senator plans to, and I’m quoting here, “Delay and slow the process in order to get the President’s attention.” This isn’t about me. We weren’t sent here to wage perpetual political campaigns against each other. We were sent here to serve the American people. And they deserve better than gridlock and games. One senator gumming up the works for the whole country is certainly not what our founding fathers envisioned.
[What I'm not telling you: This 'blueprint for an economy to last' is nothing more than just so much blather; blather I'm ever more famous for. In this context, "an economy" is based entirely on the survival of our current representative republic; that, a pseudo-democracy. History tells us the longest-lasting democracies have succumbed in 250 years, or less!! This means--statistically--the United States has a mere 14 years left (2026) in it's current lifecycle. For this reason--among others, more self-serving--I'm doing what I'm told: transform the United States away from said pseudo-democracy.
My federally (read: taxpayer-thus illegal) funded campaign stops across the country this week, I could have chosen any topic to blather on about. I chose this one for the very reason of continuing the disguise of my 'jobs-killing' decisions as good for the country; good for the environment. I have--single-handedly--practically killed domestic energy exploration and production. Pandering to opposite sides of the "Keystone XL" pipeline project has left me in the untenable position of not satisfying either side; nor doing what's most beneficial to the American people. Rarely do owe-bamacRATics do "what's most beneficial to the American people," said party does what's best for the party, for the supporter, for the donor, et al. This "Keystone" kerfuffle seeks to pacifiy the labor and construction unions on the 'pro-construction' side; while the 'anti-construction' side appeases the environmentalist whackos. Thus, my decision--if one can call it that--placated my handlers in that it failed to allow 20,000 IMMEDIATE jobs as well as hundreds-of-thousands of FUTURE jobs!! This decision will go far in the 'timeline of demise' of the current form of government.
As I'm well known for, the current campaign season is developing into some form of warfare be it race, class, gender, economic or party!! When I appointed Richard Cordray, I appointed an individual that will eventually have control over every financial and economic decision ANY American makes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is structured such that it can 'self-correct' it's path of over-reach into the citizen's financial life; taking more-and-more control over said decisions. Some members of the current 'class' of legislators have taken exception to this individual; such an exception that they intend to oppose every appointment, nomination I make. Check out this quote:
"This isn't about me."
There's never been a more false statement written by, for or about me!! This entire exploration into socio-fascism has been ENTIRELY about me!! From massaging my uncontrollable ego to the massive chip-on-my-shoulder to disguising my completely inept lack of experience; everything that happens in barackingham Palace is about me!!]
The truth is, neither party has been blameless in tactics like these. But it’s time for both parties to put an end to them. I’m asking Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, to stop this kind of behavior by passing a rule that allows all judicial and public service nominations a simple up-or-down vote within 90 days. We should also stem the corrosive influence of money in politics. The House and Senate should send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it immediately. They should limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. And they should make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa. During my Address on Tuesday night, I spoke about the incredible example set by the men and women of our armed forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. They’re not consumed with personal ambition. They don’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together. If you agree with me that leaders in Washington should follow their example, then make your voice heard. Tell your Member of Congress that it’s time to end the gridlock, and start tackling the issues that really matter – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, American skills and education, and a return to American values. An economy built to last.
[What I'm not telling you:
"We should....stem the corrosive influence of money in politics."
Given my forecast of raising a billion-dollars for my re-immaculation campaign, where is the 'stemming' of any financial influence in the political arena?!? See, just more blather that must be adhered to by the public but will never apply to me or my regime!!
The 'example set by the men and women of our armed forces' is being handsomely rewarded by firing--laying off, if you prefer--80,000 brave, dedicated and faithful soldiers,sailors, airmen and marines at a time when we've massaged the unemployment numbers down to 8.2%. (Without massaging, the U-3 unemployment would be 11+%; the U-6--everyone unemployed--rate would be approaching 16%!!). This is how we reward said dedication, bravery and faithfullness?!? Casting these selfless warriors off into a society that can't help them support their families?!? Only in owe-bamanomics; only in socio-fascism!!!
Do you ever get sick of it?!? The way I whine about every little action that doesn't go my way?!? Now I'm choosing to whine about the Congress not adhering to my suggestions; the path toward ever more controlling socio-fascism!! I pretend to not understand how the Congress can not see the benefits to the country as a whole; so I whine-and-whine until I get the college kids; the welfareRATs; other socio-fascists, on board with my wants. Most of these followers have NEVER had an original thought; they look to rulers like me to fill their heads with 'oatmeal, like' suggestions, as well as 'pay them not to work!!'
To 'go-off-teleprompter, here: Did anyone see my interview with Diane Sawyer about Newt Gingrigh calling me 'the food-stamp president?!?' Let me quote:
"First of all, I don't put people on foodstamps. People become eligible for foodstamps. Second of all, the initial expansion of food-stamp eligibility happened under my republicRAT predecessor, not under me.
No 3, when you have a disastrous economic crash that results in 8 million people losing their jobs, more people are going to need more support from the government." ]
This is just another of my many excursions into presidential blather; I'm trying to once-again, "blame Bush!!" Here--with the use of the word 'initial'--I've managed to 'toss it off' to my predecessor, President Bush-43. While not the 'initial,' the greatest expansion in history came under my watch, by those concerned about my falling poll numbers. This expansion is being used as another method of buying support, buying votes, buying donations. While feeling the effects of the 'disastrous economic crash' began under President Bush-43, the groundwork was actually laid by "Slick-Willie" Clinton and his then-HUD Secretary, Andrew Cuomo. Their efforts to buy 'the black vote' led to relaxed mortgage requirements, resulting sub-prime mortgages to those who couldn't afford them and hand no intention of ever paying them back. So the entire economic crisis can be successfully lain at the feet of the owe-bamacRATic party!!
Lest we forget: Housing sales for the year 2011 were the WORST IN RECORDED AMERICAN HISTORY.... and on my watch!!!]
barackingham Palace,
District of Corruption
January 28, 2011
On Tuesday, in my State of the Union Address, I laid out a blueprint for an economy built to last – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, skills for American workers, and a renewal of American values. This week, I took that blueprint across the country, and what I saw was people who work hard and believe in each other. They believe in the America that’s within our reach. But they’re not sure that the right thing will get done in Washington this year, or next year, or the year after that. And frankly, when you look at some of the things that go on in this town, who could blame them for being a little cynical?
Just two days ago, a senator from Utah promised to obstruct every single American I appoint to a judgeship or public service position – unless I fire the consumer watchdog I put in place to protect the American people from financial schemes or malpractice. For the most part, it’s not that this senator thinks these nominees are unqualified. In fact, all of the judicial nominees being blocked have bipartisan support. And almost 90 percent have unanimous support from the Judiciary Committee. Instead, one of his aides told reporters that the senator plans to, and I’m quoting here, “Delay and slow the process in order to get the President’s attention.” This isn’t about me. We weren’t sent here to wage perpetual political campaigns against each other. We were sent here to serve the American people. And they deserve better than gridlock and games. One senator gumming up the works for the whole country is certainly not what our founding fathers envisioned.
[What I'm not telling you: This 'blueprint for an economy to last' is nothing more than just so much blather; blather I'm ever more famous for. In this context, "an economy" is based entirely on the survival of our current representative republic; that, a pseudo-democracy. History tells us the longest-lasting democracies have succumbed in 250 years, or less!! This means--statistically--the United States has a mere 14 years left (2026) in it's current lifecycle. For this reason--among others, more self-serving--I'm doing what I'm told: transform the United States away from said pseudo-democracy.
My federally (read: taxpayer-thus illegal) funded campaign stops across the country this week, I could have chosen any topic to blather on about. I chose this one for the very reason of continuing the disguise of my 'jobs-killing' decisions as good for the country; good for the environment. I have--single-handedly--practically killed domestic energy exploration and production. Pandering to opposite sides of the "Keystone XL" pipeline project has left me in the untenable position of not satisfying either side; nor doing what's most beneficial to the American people. Rarely do owe-bamacRATics do "what's most beneficial to the American people," said party does what's best for the party, for the supporter, for the donor, et al. This "Keystone" kerfuffle seeks to pacifiy the labor and construction unions on the 'pro-construction' side; while the 'anti-construction' side appeases the environmentalist whackos. Thus, my decision--if one can call it that--placated my handlers in that it failed to allow 20,000 IMMEDIATE jobs as well as hundreds-of-thousands of FUTURE jobs!! This decision will go far in the 'timeline of demise' of the current form of government.
As I'm well known for, the current campaign season is developing into some form of warfare be it race, class, gender, economic or party!! When I appointed Richard Cordray, I appointed an individual that will eventually have control over every financial and economic decision ANY American makes. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is structured such that it can 'self-correct' it's path of over-reach into the citizen's financial life; taking more-and-more control over said decisions. Some members of the current 'class' of legislators have taken exception to this individual; such an exception that they intend to oppose every appointment, nomination I make. Check out this quote:
"This isn't about me."
There's never been a more false statement written by, for or about me!! This entire exploration into socio-fascism has been ENTIRELY about me!! From massaging my uncontrollable ego to the massive chip-on-my-shoulder to disguising my completely inept lack of experience; everything that happens in barackingham Palace is about me!!]
The truth is, neither party has been blameless in tactics like these. But it’s time for both parties to put an end to them. I’m asking Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, to stop this kind of behavior by passing a rule that allows all judicial and public service nominations a simple up-or-down vote within 90 days. We should also stem the corrosive influence of money in politics. The House and Senate should send me a bill that bans insider trading by Members of Congress, and I will sign it immediately. They should limit any elected official from owning stocks in industries they impact. And they should make sure people who bundle campaign contributions for Congress can’t lobby Congress, and vice versa. During my Address on Tuesday night, I spoke about the incredible example set by the men and women of our armed forces. At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, they exceed all expectations. They’re not consumed with personal ambition. They don’t obsess over their differences. They focus on the mission at hand. They work together. If you agree with me that leaders in Washington should follow their example, then make your voice heard. Tell your Member of Congress that it’s time to end the gridlock, and start tackling the issues that really matter – an economy built on American manufacturing, American energy, American skills and education, and a return to American values. An economy built to last.
[What I'm not telling you:
"We should....stem the corrosive influence of money in politics."
Given my forecast of raising a billion-dollars for my re-immaculation campaign, where is the 'stemming' of any financial influence in the political arena?!? See, just more blather that must be adhered to by the public but will never apply to me or my regime!!
The 'example set by the men and women of our armed forces' is being handsomely rewarded by firing--laying off, if you prefer--80,000 brave, dedicated and faithful soldiers,sailors, airmen and marines at a time when we've massaged the unemployment numbers down to 8.2%. (Without massaging, the U-3 unemployment would be 11+%; the U-6--everyone unemployed--rate would be approaching 16%!!). This is how we reward said dedication, bravery and faithfullness?!? Casting these selfless warriors off into a society that can't help them support their families?!? Only in owe-bamanomics; only in socio-fascism!!!
Do you ever get sick of it?!? The way I whine about every little action that doesn't go my way?!? Now I'm choosing to whine about the Congress not adhering to my suggestions; the path toward ever more controlling socio-fascism!! I pretend to not understand how the Congress can not see the benefits to the country as a whole; so I whine-and-whine until I get the college kids; the welfareRATs; other socio-fascists, on board with my wants. Most of these followers have NEVER had an original thought; they look to rulers like me to fill their heads with 'oatmeal, like' suggestions, as well as 'pay them not to work!!'
To 'go-off-teleprompter, here: Did anyone see my interview with Diane Sawyer about Newt Gingrigh calling me 'the food-stamp president?!?' Let me quote:
"First of all, I don't put people on foodstamps. People become eligible for foodstamps. Second of all, the initial expansion of food-stamp eligibility happened under my republicRAT predecessor, not under me.
No 3, when you have a disastrous economic crash that results in 8 million people losing their jobs, more people are going to need more support from the government." ]
This is just another of my many excursions into presidential blather; I'm trying to once-again, "blame Bush!!" Here--with the use of the word 'initial'--I've managed to 'toss it off' to my predecessor, President Bush-43. While not the 'initial,' the greatest expansion in history came under my watch, by those concerned about my falling poll numbers. This expansion is being used as another method of buying support, buying votes, buying donations. While feeling the effects of the 'disastrous economic crash' began under President Bush-43, the groundwork was actually laid by "Slick-Willie" Clinton and his then-HUD Secretary, Andrew Cuomo. Their efforts to buy 'the black vote' led to relaxed mortgage requirements, resulting sub-prime mortgages to those who couldn't afford them and hand no intention of ever paying them back. So the entire economic crisis can be successfully lain at the feet of the owe-bamacRATic party!!
Lest we forget: Housing sales for the year 2011 were the WORST IN RECORDED AMERICAN HISTORY.... and on my watch!!!]
Saturday, December 31, 2011
"Clown Prince" Weekly Blather; December 31st
A Patriotic Response To The "Clown Prince;" 12/31/2011
barackingham Palace-WEST,
Honolulu, Hi
December 31, 2011
Hello, everybody. As 2011 comes to an end and we look ahead to 2012, I want to wish everyone a happy and healthy New Year. The last year has been a time of great challenge and great progress for our country. We ended one war and began to wind down another. We dealt a crippling blow to al-Qaeda and made America more secure. We stood by our friends and allies around the world through natural disasters and revolutions. And we began to see signs of economic recovery here at home, even as too many Americans are still struggling to get ahead. There’s no doubt that 2012 will bring even more change. And as we head into the New Year, I’m hopeful that we have what it takes to face that change and come out even stronger – to grow our economy, create more jobs, and strengthen the middle class. I’m hopeful because of what we saw right before Christmas, when Members of Congress came together to prevent a tax hike for 160 million Americans – saving a typical family about $40 in every paycheck. They also made sure Americans looking for work won’t see their unemployment insurance cut off. And I expect Congress to finish the job by extending these provisions through the end of 2012. It was good to see Members of Congress do the right thing for millions of working Americans. But it was only possible because you added your voices to the debate. Through email and Twitter and over the phone, you let your representatives know what was at stake. Your lives. Your families. Your well-being. You had the courage to believe that your voices could make a difference. And at the end of the day, they made all the difference.
[What I'm not telling you: A cuppla events in the country's recent past, I find just hilarious!!! With the country $15.2 TRILLION in debt, I can make 40-bucks 'the country's most important current topic!!' Again, with the country $15.2 TRILLION in debt--and climbing exponentially each day--the congressional incompetents are about to give me hundreds-of-billions more in borrowing power-essentially, for nothing in return!! I know, I know!! You're thinking of that agreement last August where $2.1 in deficit reductions 'over ten years' was negotiated. And now, you're thinking that those Ruling Class owe-bamacRATics and those republicRATics addicted to spending other peoples' money, will actually honor the 'over-ten-years' part of the agreement?!?
Ha, ha, ha, ha...., you're killin' me, here!?!?!?!]
More than anything else, you are the ones who make me hopeful about 2012. Because we’ve got some difficult debates and some tough fights to come. As I’ve said before, we are at a make-or-break moment for the middle class. And in many ways, the actions we take in the months ahead will help determine what kind of country we want to be, and what kind of world we want our children and grandchildren to grow up in. As President, I promise to do everything I can to make America a place where hard work and responsibility are rewarded – one where everyone has a fair shot and everyone does their fair share. That’s the America I believe in. That’s the America we’ve always known. And I’m confident that if we work together, and if you keep reminding folks in Washington what’s at stake, then we will move this country forward and guarantee every American the opportunities they deserve.
[What I'm not telling you: Is anyone besides me keeping up with the campaigning in Iowa?!? With the national media at George Soros' 'beck-and-call,' I have no doubt he and the owe-bamacRATic hierarchy will pick the GOP nominee, just as we did in 2008. We all know how well that worked out for America, right?!? Notice that most media articles are positive concerning Mittens Romney; negative with Newt Gingrich?!? This is how we pick the nominee--by swaying public opinion toward the 'most beatable' candidate!! The primary reason we're picking Mittens as the opponent: Can you imagine the hoops my teleprompter programmers would have to jump through, just to keep up with the Soros response to Newt's questions and comments in a national debate?!? Gawd!! It's just too tough to lie at such a fast pace!! Can you even imagine a debate between me and Newt?!? Gawd!! He'd literally tie me in knots; I only have a negative record to run on!! But, I'm way off teleprompter, here!!
In the new year, you can rest assured, the lies'll keep on commin'!!! A take-off on what the ol' DJs usta say: "All Lies, All The Time!!
Continue to rest assured that jobs are the first and last things I think about each day { ;)) }. Continue to rest assured--much like Libya--I'll start a war somewhere in the world when I need a distraction.
Continue to rest assured the ongoing economic destruction will be ongoing ( I know, I saw that too! Dam' teleprompter programmers, anyway!!).
Continue to rest assured you'll never get the true unemployment rate from this mouth.
There's lots of other crap I'll continue but I don't want to take the time to bore you further; I gotta lotta partying to do before the owe-bama Royal Family returns to barackingham Palace!!]
barackingham Palace-WEST,
Honolulu, Hi
December 31, 2011
Hello, everybody. As 2011 comes to an end and we look ahead to 2012, I want to wish everyone a happy and healthy New Year. The last year has been a time of great challenge and great progress for our country. We ended one war and began to wind down another. We dealt a crippling blow to al-Qaeda and made America more secure. We stood by our friends and allies around the world through natural disasters and revolutions. And we began to see signs of economic recovery here at home, even as too many Americans are still struggling to get ahead. There’s no doubt that 2012 will bring even more change. And as we head into the New Year, I’m hopeful that we have what it takes to face that change and come out even stronger – to grow our economy, create more jobs, and strengthen the middle class. I’m hopeful because of what we saw right before Christmas, when Members of Congress came together to prevent a tax hike for 160 million Americans – saving a typical family about $40 in every paycheck. They also made sure Americans looking for work won’t see their unemployment insurance cut off. And I expect Congress to finish the job by extending these provisions through the end of 2012. It was good to see Members of Congress do the right thing for millions of working Americans. But it was only possible because you added your voices to the debate. Through email and Twitter and over the phone, you let your representatives know what was at stake. Your lives. Your families. Your well-being. You had the courage to believe that your voices could make a difference. And at the end of the day, they made all the difference.
[What I'm not telling you: A cuppla events in the country's recent past, I find just hilarious!!! With the country $15.2 TRILLION in debt, I can make 40-bucks 'the country's most important current topic!!' Again, with the country $15.2 TRILLION in debt--and climbing exponentially each day--the congressional incompetents are about to give me hundreds-of-billions more in borrowing power-essentially, for nothing in return!! I know, I know!! You're thinking of that agreement last August where $2.1 in deficit reductions 'over ten years' was negotiated. And now, you're thinking that those Ruling Class owe-bamacRATics and those republicRATics addicted to spending other peoples' money, will actually honor the 'over-ten-years' part of the agreement?!?
Ha, ha, ha, ha...., you're killin' me, here!?!?!?!]
More than anything else, you are the ones who make me hopeful about 2012. Because we’ve got some difficult debates and some tough fights to come. As I’ve said before, we are at a make-or-break moment for the middle class. And in many ways, the actions we take in the months ahead will help determine what kind of country we want to be, and what kind of world we want our children and grandchildren to grow up in. As President, I promise to do everything I can to make America a place where hard work and responsibility are rewarded – one where everyone has a fair shot and everyone does their fair share. That’s the America I believe in. That’s the America we’ve always known. And I’m confident that if we work together, and if you keep reminding folks in Washington what’s at stake, then we will move this country forward and guarantee every American the opportunities they deserve.
[What I'm not telling you: Is anyone besides me keeping up with the campaigning in Iowa?!? With the national media at George Soros' 'beck-and-call,' I have no doubt he and the owe-bamacRATic hierarchy will pick the GOP nominee, just as we did in 2008. We all know how well that worked out for America, right?!? Notice that most media articles are positive concerning Mittens Romney; negative with Newt Gingrich?!? This is how we pick the nominee--by swaying public opinion toward the 'most beatable' candidate!! The primary reason we're picking Mittens as the opponent: Can you imagine the hoops my teleprompter programmers would have to jump through, just to keep up with the Soros response to Newt's questions and comments in a national debate?!? Gawd!! It's just too tough to lie at such a fast pace!! Can you even imagine a debate between me and Newt?!? Gawd!! He'd literally tie me in knots; I only have a negative record to run on!! But, I'm way off teleprompter, here!!
In the new year, you can rest assured, the lies'll keep on commin'!!! A take-off on what the ol' DJs usta say: "All Lies, All The Time!!
Continue to rest assured that jobs are the first and last things I think about each day { ;)) }. Continue to rest assured--much like Libya--I'll start a war somewhere in the world when I need a distraction.
Continue to rest assured the ongoing economic destruction will be ongoing ( I know, I saw that too! Dam' teleprompter programmers, anyway!!).
Continue to rest assured you'll never get the true unemployment rate from this mouth.
There's lots of other crap I'll continue but I don't want to take the time to bore you further; I gotta lotta partying to do before the owe-bama Royal Family returns to barackingham Palace!!]
Thursday, November 17, 2011
This'n'That; November Seventeenth #2; As We Expected
Why Newt; Why Now?!?
What's the big deal with Newt Gingrich having earned 1.6, 1.8 Million bucks from Freddie Mac and/or Fannie Mae over the course of nine years?!? At the most, he's averaged $200,000 per year. What-ta-hell's the big deal?!? That's just a bit more than the average U.S. Congressman!! If the owe-bama's media butt-buddies wanna bitch about something: bitch about Franklin Raines who got $30MILLION PER YEAR, to run Fannie Mae into the ground!! Will there be any comparisons by the owe-bama media butt-buddies?!? Not No, but HELL NO!!
Better yet: the media butt-buddies should whine about the paltry fine and penalties after Raines and a cuppla buddies had their asses hauled into court!! Together these owe-bamacRATic miscreants bilked the federal government out of $125-150Million; a grand-total of $3Million in fines and penalties were paid! By the owe-bamacRATic miscreants?!? Absolutely not!!
An insurance company paid the fines and penalties!!
Rather than hang Newt out-to-dry, continue to tell us that Willard Romney has the best chance to beat "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist!"
Til Nex'Time....
What's the big deal with Newt Gingrich having earned 1.6, 1.8 Million bucks from Freddie Mac and/or Fannie Mae over the course of nine years?!? At the most, he's averaged $200,000 per year. What-ta-hell's the big deal?!? That's just a bit more than the average U.S. Congressman!! If the owe-bama's media butt-buddies wanna bitch about something: bitch about Franklin Raines who got $30MILLION PER YEAR, to run Fannie Mae into the ground!! Will there be any comparisons by the owe-bama media butt-buddies?!? Not No, but HELL NO!!
Better yet: the media butt-buddies should whine about the paltry fine and penalties after Raines and a cuppla buddies had their asses hauled into court!! Together these owe-bamacRATic miscreants bilked the federal government out of $125-150Million; a grand-total of $3Million in fines and penalties were paid! By the owe-bamacRATic miscreants?!? Absolutely not!!
An insurance company paid the fines and penalties!!
Rather than hang Newt out-to-dry, continue to tell us that Willard Romney has the best chance to beat "Clown Prince ZERO-bama, the Narcissist!"
Til Nex'Time....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
